Deidre Mccloskey, The Bourgeois Virtues: Term Paper

PAGES
4
WORDS
1062
Cite

(1628). "An ethical relationship between managers and employees is due to the fact respect should govern all human relationship. . . . there is nothing in a 'morally correct' relationship between managers and employees that goes against the company's desire to make a profit -- on the contrary, such a peaceable relationship can help to meet this desire." (1631).

The Malden Mills plant dramatically increased production after Feuerstein's benevolence. (1631).

Child Labor from the Perspective of Virtues Ethics & Kantian Ethics

Anscombe criticized the rule-based ethics associated with the ideas of J.S. Mill and Kant. She thought it made no sense to rely upon a rule-based ethics which commanded a particular course of action for any situation on the basis of universal principles applicable everywhere. According to Anscombe, modern culture had given up on the idea of a single, universal "lawgiver" who would prescribe a single set of rules for all of humanity. In the absence of a god-like lawgiver, ethical judgments could not be so universal and had to account for the findings of modern moral psychology.

Anscombe contended that ethical judgments should be made with reference to ideas about character, virtue, and the promotion of human flourishing. (cite).

Eudaimonist virtue ethics promotes the idea that virtues are those characteristics and impulses that contribute to human flourishing and social happiness. Those who adhere to a eudiamonist perspective believe that ethical judgments should be made by employing reason to determine the best way to serve virtues in a particular situation. (get cites)

Tim Scanlon argues that virtue ethics is dangerous because it is too easy to confuse self-interest with the objects of virtue....

...

He contends that moral principles guide individual reason about ethical problems. (Wallace, 450-51). Individuals don't reason from their desires; they reason on the basis of the moral rules that they observe. (Id). Some individual, subjective desires, shape reason. (Wallace 434; Scanlon, What We Owe, 40-45). but, in general, moral reasons are not contingent upon subjective facts. (Wallace 434). Individuals want to develop reasons that will win the approval of others and that will not seem purely subjective. (Wallace 434). Individuals achieve social standing when they do the right thing, as defined by others. (Wallace 455)
A viture ethicist thinks that an action is right when it is the action that a virtuous person would perform under the circumstances. What makes the person "virtuous" depends upon what characteristics are valued. (Hursthouse, 239).

The question is whether differences about ethical decisions depend upon a different understanding of facts or a different set of values that are applied to the facts (Hursthouse, 241)

Utilitarianism and Maximizing Utility

Utilitarianism puts and equal value on self-interest and social interest (Slote, 105)

Bentham believed that all virtues could be combined into one that maximizes "utility." (McCloskey, 338)

Utilitarianism reduces human virtues and emotions too much -- so much that the pursuit of utility can hardly be used to explain any decision. (McCloskey 338-39).

Human behavior is not as rational as utilitarians suppose, and individuals often pursue "rational" objectives that really aren't so rational. (McCloskey, pp. 433-436).

The balance of prudence and solidarity is not calculated in precisely the way that utilitarians think. (McCloskey, p.…

Cite this Document:

"Deidre Mccloskey The Bourgeois Virtues " (2010, May 18) Retrieved April 23, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/deidre-mccloskey-the-bourgeois-virtues-3099

"Deidre Mccloskey The Bourgeois Virtues " 18 May 2010. Web.23 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/deidre-mccloskey-the-bourgeois-virtues-3099>

"Deidre Mccloskey The Bourgeois Virtues ", 18 May 2010, Accessed.23 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/deidre-mccloskey-the-bourgeois-virtues-3099

Related Documents

The concept of duty implies the need to overcome some obstacle in order to act, and it is foolish to speak of God as having to overcome any obstacles whatever. To explain further the notion of duty, Kant uses as an example a merchant who does not overcharge an inexperienced customer. This decision is completely in accord with duty. Assume, though that the merchant avoids overcharging so that he

human life be more valuable than another? William Godwin's thought experiment concerning Fenelon and his valet is intended to argue precisely this point. Godwin proposed a burning building with two people in it, Fenelon and his servant. Godwin argues "that life ought to be preferred which will be most conducive to the general good" and concludes that the moralist who would write the "immortal Telemachus" is therefore more valuable

Ethical Issues of Importance Kant's categorical imperative is the notion that there are some compulsions that are inherently ethical. It means there are some actions and codes of ethics that are ethically defensible in an immutable fashion, regardless of the situation. The best example of a categorical imperative is the proverbial golden rule which states: do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Hypothetical imperatives function as the antithesis

Utilitarianism and Categorical Imperatives A Comparison of the Theories of Utilitarianism and Categorical Imperatives The principles of Utilitarianism and Categorical Imperatives contradict each other on many fronts. Both provide a rational for making moral decisions, both have benefits and flaws. A compelling argument can be made for each. From my perspective the principal's of Kant exemplify a more ethical way to conduct life. Utilitarianism Utilitarianism as a specific school of thought is generally credited

There is a need to clearly point out that the two elements are never synonymous. The process of perfecting our own natural state in the Kantian view implies that we are actually in the process of attempting to cultivate "the crude dispositions of [our] nature, by which the animal is first raised into the human being" (Kant 1996b).In order to achieve this, Kant suggests that one is required to effectively cultivate

The Bible also calls for the application of human free will to morality, as does Kant. Stories in the Bible reveal how human actors either obey or disobey the moral codes prescribed to them by the Biblical authorities, namely God. When God issues a "thou shalt," that moral law is ensconced. The person has free will, and therefore can be tricked by a malicious force symbolized by Satan. It is