Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Legal Brief
US Airways Inc. v. Robert Barnett (United States Supreme Court 2001)
Type of Action
The type of action brought before the Supreme Court was an appeal from a lower court. The appellate court affirmed part of the prior decision, reversed part of the prior decision and remanded the rest. Prior to reaching the Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard the court (196 F.3d 979)
Facts of the Case
The facts of the case are pretty basic. An employee named Robert Barnett became disabled due to a back injury and thus requested to be transferred to a mail room position that was less demanding physically. Subsequent to that, the employee then lost that job due to be bids being made by employees who were more senior in nature. Mr. Barnett sued U.S. Airways under the Americans with Disability Act for not making proper accommodations and allowing him to keep his job (Oyez, 2014)
Contentions of the Parties
As noted in the prior section, Mr. Barnett had to take a less demanding job due to a back injury. He then lost the job under the established seniority system that existed in the firm. Mr. Barnett asserted that this was illegal as it did not protect his rights and demands of a reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act. U.S. Airways insisted that the use of their prior-established seniority-based...
The back injury in question suffered by Barnett did happen on the job as Barnett was a baggage handled and he was injured while on his U.S. Airways job.
Decision
Although the decision was not unanimous (7-2), it was held that the Americans with Disabilities Act hinges on the words "reasonable accommodation" and that overriding a prior-established seniority system or something similar has to be proven to be "reasonable." In essence, Mr. Barnett would have had to prove that the elimination or temporary ignorance of the agreed-upon seniority system was reasonable given the matter at hand. Indeed, Barnett initially transferred to the mailroom job using his own seniority and he then lost that same job when the job later came up for bid again. Since Barnett's bid that won the job and then the bid that lost it was under a legitimate and legal seniority system that all employees understood to be the way things worked at U.S. Airways,…
References
NCD. (2014, May 24). National Council on Disability. Policy Brief Series. Retrieved May 24, 2014, from http://www.ncd.gov/publications/2003/March52003
Oyez. (2014, May 24). U.S. AIRWAYS v. BARNETT. U.S. Airways v. Barnett. Retrieved May 24, 2014, from http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2001/2001_00_1250
Vries, L. (2002, April 29). Disability Vs Seniority. CBSNews. Retrieved May 24, 2014, from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/disability-vs.-seniority/
In presenting their case to the U.S. Supreme Court the company articulated that the usurpation of the authority of a seniority system is not justifiable under the ADA provisions, and as such Barnett was not wrongfully denied the opportunity to maintain his position. Does the Supreme Court Decide that a Seniority System "Trumps" and Accommodation Request? The Court in arriving at its decision presents a reasoned and thoughtful explanation of seniority
Under these circumstances, an ethical dilemma is born. Should society control its development or leave it to chance? And in the case that it should control it, which categories should it help? If the person in the above mentioned example is helped, we could assume that in a certain way, the person who was not helped because he or she already disposed of the necessary means, the latter one might
Another possibility is to allow companies to convert traditional defined-benefit pensions, which encourage retirement as early as age 55, to cash-balance plans, which have no built-in incentives to retire. Perhaps the most controversial idea is to break the typical link between pay and seniority. As more people work into their late 60s and 70s, pay should be adjusted to match how much people work and what they accomplish on
Labor Relations & Globalization Argue for or against the use of the "school voucher program." Which do you believe is right? Explain your answer. Both the National Education Association (NEA) and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) identify school voucher programs as a threat to public employees (Carrell & Heavrin, 2007). Critics say that school vouchers provide families with public funds that can be used for private schools with private agendas. Advocates
John Brown applied for a job as a grounds worker at a federal facility and was denied employment because of his sexual orientation. He asks you to explain the law relevant to his situation. What if the same thing happened at Boston University? Unfortunately title VII does not prohibit discrimination because of an individual's sexual orientation. Though Title VII prohibits discrimination because of sex, the word sex is interpreted gender. However,
The ADEA permits employers to favor older workers based on age even when doing so adversely affects a younger worker who is 40 or older" (Facts about age discrimination, 2008, EEOC). The worker was clearly discriminated against for a promotional opportunity based upon his age, despite his superior performance. All of the available evidence suggests that Employee B. was doing superior work in contrast to his younger co-worker. There is