Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
He feels that Nora's freedom is not a reality since she couldn't possibly just leave her house and establish her own identity without money. "Nora needs money -- to put it more elegantly, it is economics which matters in the end. Freedom is certainly not something that can be bought for money. But it can be lost through lack of money." (Found in Schwarez)
In short, whatever were the reasons behind subjugation, the fact remains that women in the 19th century and to a large extent, even today are considered the second grade citizens of the world. Though men around the world would reluctantly accept that their lives are meaningless without women, the world in general wouldn't allow women to occupy an equal place...
If the situation is still such today, we can only imagine how restrictive they must have been in the 19th century when the play appeared. For this reason, Ibsen's attempt to seek rights for women on the basis on their human worth is definitely commendable.
References
Vera Schwarez. (1975) Ibsen's Nora: the Promise and the Trap. Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars Volume: 7. Issue: 1.
Harold Bloom (ed) (1999) Henrik Ibsen; Chelsea House Publishers; Philadelphia;
Brian W. Downs. (1950) a Study of Six Plays by Ibsen. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, England.
Cynthia Griffin Wolff (1994) Lily Bart and the Drama of Femininity. American Literary History. Volume: 6. Issue: 1.
Doll's House Henrik Ibsen's play A Doll's Housemade him the father of modern literature. His writing showed tragedy and drama in a new and rather modern way. Prior to an analysis of the story at hand, it is only relevant that the plot and main characters are discussed in detail. This story does not revolve around a whole bunch of characters and is based on only a few days. The story
Doll's House (Henrik Ibsen) The title of Ibsen's masterpiece -- A Doll's House -- doesn't lack meaning or symbolism; that is to say that the house in which Nora, the protagonist, lives is a house, which, for all intents and purposes, is one that has been constructed for the sole purpose of keeping her a kept woman (i.e. A doll in a doll's house). Like a play thing, Nora makes
Henrik Ibsen's a Doll's House Henrik Ibsen's characters are not the people they appear to be. On the surface and at the beginning of the play audiences see typical people, pursuing typical lives with typical problems. Not until the play progresses, and in retrospect, do audiences realize that society negatively or positively stimulates the characters motives and actions. This paper looks at three such characters in Henrik Ibsen's play A
"The dramatically active question of the last act is whether the "wonderful thing" will happen or not. The scene in which Nora realizes that it won't is one of the great scenes in modern drama, not only in precipitating the same mordant speeches" (Bloom, 32). Nora rapidly discovers that she cannot save Torvald and sadly leaves him as she knows that she needs change in her life and that
Doll's House" Henrik Ibsen's 'The Doll's House' is one of the most widely appreciated classics that underscored the need of a woman to be liberated, to be a person before being a wife and a mother or a daughter. Ibsen's female lead, Nora, is a married woman and on the surface there is nothing wrong with her married life. She has a husband who appears to be caring and loving
Ibsen's a Doll's House Henrik Ibsen's play A Doll's House dramatizes its heroine's dilemma by providing an example of what fate might possibly await her: the subplot involving Mrs. Linde is designed by Ibsen as a deliberate contrast and warning to Nora, the "little doll" of the play's title (Ibsen 84).. I hope by an examination of the different uses Ibsen makes of his counterplot to demonstrate that Ibsen intends the