Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Putting someone in a classroom is only half of the feat; getting the person to want to learn and be open to knowledge and learning is another thing.
An advocacy or participatory worldview holds that "our world is co-created both by the given cosmos and by how we comprehend it and make choices within it" (Heron 2001). This type of worldview in regards to learning -- e-learning or traditional learning -- is not completely unlike the constructivism theory. Though our world is created by something outside of ourselves, how we live in that world and what we choose to do is completely up to us. This means that no matter whether we are sitting on a computer learning in our living rooms or whether we are in a classroom, what we are being offered and what we are comprehending is all up to the learner and choices are made by the learner in relation to the situation. This is most likely the reason that no significant difference in performance (between e-learners and classroom learners) has been found -- because each situation is so subjective.
The existence of motivational factors and learning styles as well as the increased engagement of students in online environments suggests that a performance enhancement is available in online educational settings (Daymont & Blau 2008; Liu 2007; Wighting et al. 2008). While one might find that statement difficult to believe, and it would...
The meaning of an ideology can be found in the practical consequences of accepting it, and any impractical ideas should be rejected. If we are to look at the issue of whether or not traditional learning is better than e-learning, we will see that since e-learning does work satisfactorily, then we can accept is as good and practical. If studies showed over and over again that e-learning was ineffective, then we might be able to reject it as a way of learning, but studies do not say that. As mentioned, there isn't any studies that suggest empirically than one type of learning is better than the other.
References:
Heron, J. (2001). Transpersonal co-operative Inquiry. Handbook of action research,
participative inquiry & practice (pp.333-339). CA: Sage Publications.
Daymont, Blau (year) name of publication.
Walls, John. (2000). E-learning vs. face-to-face training: and the winner is… Houston business journal. Retrieved on September 4, 2010, from the Website:
http://www.bizjournals.com/houston/stories/2000/08/07/focus8.html
A threat to construct would mean that there was a failure in the way that constructs -- or thoughts -- were formed. In the case of e-learning, if we were to show that e-learners are more open to not just non-traditional learning, but they are more open to non-traditional ideas, in general, a threat to construct validity would probably say that e-learners are not more open than any other learners
The study showed that most students didn't consider e-learning as a benefit on campus; males who had previous experience with computers and students with positive attitudes about new technology were less positive to e-learning on campus that other students, overall. 3. Locate a mixed methods study that uses a theoretical lens, such as a feminist, ethical/racial, or class perspective. Identify specifically how the lens shapes the steps taken in the
G., you like Mountain Dew just a tiny bit more), for another person who listed those soft drinks in the same order, the preference could be great (they would rather drink water than Pepsi if there weren't any Mountain Dew). That being said, ordinal scales only let you interpret gross order -- not the relative positional distances (CSSE 2010). In an interval type of scale, you would maybe be asked to
Qualitative Study. The existence, if any, performance difference between students in online and traditional learning environments has yet to be conclusively determined; though several studies have found no significant difference in performance, the existence of different motivational factors and learning styles as well as the increased engagement of students in online environments seems to suggest that a performance enhancement is available in online educational settings (Daymont & Blau 2008; Liu 2007;
Ethnography and in-depth interviews are the methods that will be applied for the educators group, while ethnography, in-depth interviews, and experimental methods will be used for the students group. Meta-analysis would simply include an analysis of all quantitative studies conducted proposing new measures and tools that will help evaluate the effective of online and/or traditional learning approaches. For the ethnography and in-depth interviews, thematic analysis will be used to dimensionalize
However, as noted before, because of the increased level of motivation with the online students (due to a myriad of factors), the suggestion that online learners may perform better than traditional learners may have some validity to it. Learning theorist Laurillard (1997; Glenn, Jones, & Hoyt 2003) suggested that student-teacher interaction is a chief aspect of academic learning. Laurillard (1997; 2003) posited that "large class size, independent study and some