To further this hypothesis, we show a 7 percentile arrest rate for begging, an additional sign of poverty.
There are details missing from the data, however. We do not know the quality or robustness of some of the offenses; stealing lumped together, etc. Further examination might tell us more about demographic (age, ethnicity, education) in relation to a particular crime or punishment, and certainly if we knew more about the geographic universe (location) of arrest or crime, we could draw additional conclusions. For instance, were most sex crimes, assaults, and thefts committed in poorer locations (Whitechapel, for instance)?
What the data does tell us, from our brief analysis, is that we have a very stratified society in which there are three major crimes that the middle and upper classes simply cannot tolerate: breaking the peace, theft, and overt begging. We find that punishment for these crimes is swift, with the majority of sentences handed down focusing on hard labor. This tells us that Victorian society was likely less interested in rehabilitation that punishment -- deterrence perhaps, but how would hard labor reform a thief, especially a poor thief? We do not see a plethora of social programs in place during the early part of the 1800s, but instead a burgeoning industrial giant with an evolving and growing middle class who wanted the poor and their crimes "put away" from society. This interpretation...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now