Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
There would be no nectarines and tomatoes in the dead of winter, although when these foods were eaten in season, they would be healthier, tastier, and leave less of an ecological footprint. This would require a shift in approach to buying food, and perhaps require more canning, freezing, and preserving of foods than people might have done in the past. More cooking would also be necessary, given the smaller supply of foodstuffs. Produce might also be more expensive, given the more labor-intensive practices involved in pesticide-free farming.
With the use of solar power for energy, people would no longer be able to live in a 24/7 society. Sunrise to sunset would define the day as it did so long in the past. This might make people happier, given the beneficial effects of sunlight -- it raises the mood, is full of Vitamin D, and is naturally energizing. But again, this would come at a 'cost' -- no more all-night parties, no more surfing the Internet at 12am. Of course, the miracle solar cell that provides energy through tidal and wind energy would enable the existence of some sustainable forms of non-solar energy after the sun had set, particularly during the times in the winter when solar power is in short supply, but unfettered consumption of electricity, and essentially living a life in artificial light would have to come to an end, depending on how functional solar cells would be over time. And almost everyone in the community would have the same time schedule. There would be less living in isolation for good, or for ill. People would feel more relaxed, but people who like to live by their own schedules might be frustrated.
The end of competitive sports and for-profit corporations would end the 'dog eat dog' culture of today's corporate environment, even the schools. But it also might mean that people would be less pressured to excel, and to come up with new ideas and solutions to make a profit, since there was less incentive to do so. There would be a greater sense of social responsibility to the community and to others because people would not be judged upon how they were able to accumulate the trappings of success. More of the nation's money would be budgeted to help the needy, and to provide health insurance to everyone, and this would mean those who are currently poor would likely flourish in Ecotopia. But life in Ecotopia would definitely come at a personal cost to people who are more affluent, or perhaps more iconoclastic, individual, creative -- and competitive by nature.
Works Cited
Callenbach, Ernest. Ecotopia Imagined. Heyday Books, 1981.
Works Cited
Callenbach, Ernest. Ecotopia Imagined. Heyday Books, 1981.
When regulations increase, the tendency to cheat might increase. 2.4 Switzerland/Denmark Examples for Organic Farming Ruth Rossier (2005), College of Agriculture, Auburn University, purports in the study, "Role models and farm development options: A comparison of seven Swiss farm families," Following not yet rewritten: with the framework of agricultural policy that has changed dramatically since the 1990s including the introduction of direct payments and the enforcement of various agrarian reforms (Agricultural Policy 2002
Chapter 3 Literature Review/Justification Organic farming as a practice was developed by both experienced farmers and private gardeners in the early 1970's. Through trial and error, these farmers, gardeners and later, newly interested scientists, worked individually and then later as research teams to develop the holistic methods that are being used around the globe today. Conventional farming has and still is the norm for the majority of agricultural production around the
This is underscored by the brief history of organic farming as described in the text by Paull (2006). Paull would refer to a British agriculturalist named Lord Northbourne, who would coin the term organic farming to refer to that which viewed the whole ecology of the farm as something which must be preserved. In his work with Lyons (2008), Paull would renew his endorsement of organic regulatory measures, this time in response to increased consideration of
Organic Produce & Farming For most of history, farming was organic simply because of the available materials used in agriculture. Only during the middle to late 20th and early 21st centuries, with the advent of synthetic chemicals, was a new process for fertilizing and preserving foods available. This more recent style of production is referred to as "conventional," though organic production has been the convention for a much greater period of
And in response to big power lobbying, Senate and House Republicans on the Agriculture appropriations inserted a provision in 2005 into the department's budget, which would allow the use of certain artificial ingredients in organic foods. Many players in the organic industry today also argue that they are willing to use some synthetics in producing organic food. Joseph Mendelson and other advocates of strict organic standards argue that these
From an environmental perspective this work demonstrates the fact that the growth of this movement has been reinvigorated as a result of the fact that many have come to understand how dangerous many of the chemicals used in commercial agriculture are to the earth and the body. "The last few years have seen the issues of BSE, genetically modified foods, hormone disruption and antibiotic resistance come to the fore