Ending a Spousal Relationship:
A spousal relationship can generally be regarded as a marriage that can be ended through various ways depending on the partners' choice. Generally, a spousal relationship can be terminated through annulment, legal separation, dissolution, and divorce. While annulment is the legal way of proving that the relationship was never valid, legal separation entails a formal decree of the rights and responsibilities of every spouse while living apart ("Four Ways to End a Marriage," n.d.). On the contrary, dissolution is a legal process of concurring on issues and moving on through cooperation from each spouse whereas divorce is an alternative used when there are huge differences between the parties on how to end the relationship. The annulment method requires the proof of various aspects such as a close blood relationship between the partners, the possibility of one party being underage, and inability to consummate the marriage.
While these methods are different, they have certain probable repercussions on the spouses' financial situations, the community and employers. In relation to financial situations, the methods may result in difficulties in dividing family assets while the community could be negatively affected by the possibility of people easily end their marriages upon dissatisfaction. For employers, these methods may contribute to the inability of the parties to perform effectively in their specific job duties.
Lehr v. Robertson:
One of the most essential relationships in the American society is the parent-child relationship because of its effect on the nurture and safety of dependent people. The Lehr v. Robertson case is a lawsuit that was based on the protection of the relationship between a parent and child. This case examined the state's protections of parental rights in relation to an unmarried father's unclear relationship with a child he was yet to support and rarely seen in two years since he birth. Based on its compelling interest in forbidding homosexual marriages, the state through the court affirmed to ruling of the lower court in which the adoption was upheld. The best method for supporting the restoration of the father's visitation privileges is through engaging him in the child's welfare system. In this scenario, the father's visitation privileges would be upheld by engaging him in the child's welfare system because he does not pose a threat of harm to the child. The best argument to support his involvement in the process is that his involvement protects his legal rights, promotes the child's healthy development and social wellness, and promotes family connections (Cohen et. al., 2009, p.75).
Formation of a Contract:
You’re 73% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.