Ethics
When considering what actions Joan should take with respect to Tim, she needs to set priorities. As a manager, she needs to protect the interests of the company's owners (shareholders) first and foremost. This alone creates a dilemma in that there clearly be short-term negative financial consequences of an investigation, but in the long-run if Tim caused another, more serious accident the consequences could be far greater. The internal issues with respect to union-management relations are secondary, in that they can indirectly affect company performance. Her own career is of tertiary concern, but understandably many managers ascribe higher value to this, given that they ultimately are subject to at-will employment and therefore have a vested interest in placing their own interests above all else.
The official channels in this case are closed. There has been no investigation and there is no legal reason to pursue the matter further. Moreover, given the union contract there is little in the way of serious consequence that could happen with respect to Tim should an investigation find the allegations true. It is also worth noting that Joan has limited ability to prove the allegations a week after the fact.
Thus, Joan's best course of action would be to sidestep the official channels and seek an informal resolution. She should informally speak to Tim regarding the issue, and make sure that management's positions on the matter are well-known. She could even offer that he take the counseling voluntarily to avoid further investigation into the matter. On the management side, she should further act to protect the company's best interests by introducing a policy of mandatory post-accident drug testing to the next round of union negotiations. This would come with stiffer penalties than are currently prescribed. This further protects the interests of the company, and again without suffering short-term negative consequences. Additionally, these actions affirm a positive management-union relationship and improve standing by creatively solving an ethical dilemma in a manner that protects the interests of the company both in the short-term and long-term.
Ethics Consider the three purposes of morality treated in Chapter 1. Which of these would it be easier for utilitarianism to fulfill and which could well be more difficult for that system to fully meet? Of the three purposes of morality treated in Chapter One, perhaps the easiest purpose for the ethical system of utilitarianism, as developed by the Englishman Jeremy Bentham, to meet would be to create a functional system of
Business Law Ethics Ethics in Action Common Characteristics of Poor Decision Making In order to make ethically sound decisions, it is necessary to acquire and secure all the pertinent facts; therefore, one of the most common characteristics of a poorly made decision is the lack of necessary and relevant facts. Entering the decision making process with favor and bias toward a particular outcome is an additional trait of a decision that is poorly
Ethics in Relationship to Power Structures Ethical obligations allegedly breached by Smith or Halloran while in office Senator Malcolm Smith and New York City Councilman Dan Halloran were accused of attempting to fix the mayoral ballot. They were allegedly reported having exchanged thousands of dollars in cash. This money was intended to pay off the officials of the Republican Party to agree to one of the Democrats, Smith on the GOP line.
Therefore, corporations have had to change their viewpoints and start looking at the long-term consequences of their behavior, as well as looking at the bottom line. Businesses also have to be concerned because consumers have also become aware of environmental concerns, and many consumers are demanding earth-friendly products and have shown a willingness to pay more money to competitors who observe environmentally-friendly practices. Interestingly enough, this demand has given rise
Aside from the previously mentioned policies, the Intel ethic code also contains reference to intellectual property, gratuities, reciprocity, publicity, small and minority suppliers, controlled substances, environment, health and safety. The intellectual property right protection policy states the fact that Intel completely respects the rights of all business partners, suppliers and competitor companies. However, the publicity policy mentions that business partners are denied the right to sell their own products by
There are several ways that BP could have chosen to respond, all of which were "open" to them (i.e. they had free will), yet those chose to take paths that were less moral. Kant's universal law would have them put their responsibility to humanity as the motivator, however, their motives have not proven to be driven by doing what is genuinely good for humanity. Blackburn (2009) states that it is