The above relates directly to the destruction of a prisoner's basic right for respect. Indeed, all rights, basic or not, are removed when the inmate enters the prison system. This is part of the system that destroys the former identity of the prisoner completely. Not only all self-respect, but also all respect from others, are removed from the prisoner. This destruction of respect is used by the prison system in order to keep control over the inmates. The only way in which inmates can the react is to become part of the subcultures, where they can at least earn respect from their fellow inmates, and perhaps regain some sense of self-respect.
Finally, the ideal of hope is also completely destroyed within the prison, and it is directly related to the prison sentence. A person with a life sentence for example, has little hope of release, even on parole. The destruction of hope is part of the destruction of the other basic elements of humanity. It is also one of the tools that officials use to keep control of the prisoners. Together with fear and a lack of respect, the prisoner's dehumanization is complete when removing his sense of hope. And indeed, hope is the one element that cannot be regained by joining a subculture, unless it the hope for advancing to a leadership position, or the hope of not being injured or killed by one's rivals.
Every human being has a basic need for respect, hope and safety. The correctional policy at the facility where Inmate is housed is particularly aimed at the destruction of all these in order to keep control of the prison inmates. The policy is therefore not aimed at any form of rehabilitation, but rather at punishing prisoners in the most senseless way possible for their crimes. This punishment relates to dehumanization, and the ultimate effect is that prisoners who do manage to reenter society, find it very hard to readjust to the world outside of prison.
d. In the light of the above, I would suggest several changes to the facility, and indeed to the entire prison system. Firstly, I would advocate the preservation of a prisoner's dignity and sense of safety. I would then use these as a basis for rehabilitation rather than control. As it is, officials are focused on control, based upon a paradigm of assumption. Officials assume that prisoners will reoffend once they reenter society. They also assume that prisoners will never change and therefore do not give them the opportunity to do so. The current system is therefore locked into a cycle of ineffectual and overcrowded...
The shower, searching and other procedures should be handled with more respect towards the prisoner. Officials should not act as if they enjoy the procedure, and should make prisoners aware that it is a necessary step in ensuring that the prison remains targeted towards its goal of rehabilitation.
The goal of rehabilitation should also be implemented by starting with a change in official attitude. Officials should recognize prisoners as human beings, and not as sub-human souls who do not have any hope of improving themselves or their lives. Education programs should be targeted towards making prisoners understand that they have committed a crime and should make amends for this. When they understand the basic truth of their offense and its effect, they must be aware that they can change if they want to. The whole prison system should then be targeted towards affecting this change.
Psychiatrists and other medical professionals should also be employed not only to take ineffective tests, but rather to provide prisoners with the opportunity to talk about things that bother them, and particularly about the lives and actions they chose to lead to their prison sentences. This is one of the ways in which prisoners can be made aware of the necessity to take responsibility for their crimes. The prison should therefore not be an establishment outside of society, but should rather be used as a facility to help inmates learn to become part of society again. Each prisoner should be infused with the hope of reentering society. Rewards can be offered in this regard. Prisoners should for example be offered the opportunity to perform some public service in return for which they can be allowed some supervised time outside of the prison walls in order to once again prepare them for society.
A cannot imagine what it would be like to be in prison. The complete loss of freedom to do something I take for granted in general life is a horror I cannot contemplate. I cannot imagine being unable to go to the movies or play pool with my friends. I cannot imagine what it would be like to not be able to shop for a new pair of jeans when I feel like it, or to have to ask for something to read when I'm bored, or indeed be unable to watch television when I want or to what I want.
In the light of the above and after reading the documents, I by no means deny that some form of correctional facility is necessary to curb the escalating crime in modern society. I just feel the form that it currently takes is hopelessly ineffective. This is proven by the statistics. While I do not claim that my solutions are perfect, some form of change is necessary, and should be implemented soon, if officials do not want a crisis on…
The documents we provide are to be used as a sample, template, outline, guideline in helping you write your own paper, not to be used for academic credit. All users must abide by our "Student Honor Code" or you will be restricted access to our website.
Eye Witness Memory and Identification In the contemporary legal environment, an eyewitness plays a critical role in the legal system. A correct eyewitness identification has helped in advancing an investigation, and can be used to solve a complex case. Despite the importance of eyewitness identification in a legal system, eyewitness misidentification is being identified as the contributing factor to wrongful convictions based on the DNA testing. Typically, the eyewitness misidentification leads
economic compensation enough for wrongfully convicted inmates? The pronouncement of a crime charge against a person marks the begging of a legal battle for freedom of that individual. When the accused stand in court, their sole hope, is to have a plea of not guilty, which convinces the judges to let them free? At the end of any hearing, the prosecutors present their submissions, from which the court makes the
Oshinsky, "Worse Than Slavery" David Oshinsky's history of "convict labor" in the Reconstruction-era American South bears the title Worse Than Slavery. The title itself raises questions about the role played by moralistic discourse in historiography, and what purpose it serves. Oshinsky certainly paints a grim picture of the systematic use of African-American prisoners at Parchman Farm -- the focus of his study -- and throughout the South after the Civil War.
While black men can be incredibly diverse-looking, she may focus on those features that tend to differentiate them from white men. This is a risk in any cross-racial identification, where someone may notice differences from their own ethnic group, but fail to look beyond those features that stand out as "other" in his mind, which makes any person in that racial group a possible suspect. In fact, it is impossible
Given the context and the fact that being a convicted criminal and a sex offender could conceivably make the risk of any type of abuse (whether or not of a sexual nature) foreseeable, that defense is unlikely to succeed. However, generally, the knowledge of one Board member who does not disclose that knowledge to the Board will not be imputed to the rest of the Board. In any case,
In additon, there is the sustenance of a certain sense of uniformity in accordance with the economic accomplishments of the American society. Besides, given the continued electoral progress of the far-right parties that formally eschew anti-Semitism, and the lack of progress made by the radical, neo-Nazi or extremist groups that are often openly anti-Semitic, maintaining the distinction between these two types of groups (although the boundaries are occasionally blurred)