¶ … Alter the Forensic Dynamics during an Interviewing Process
In this paper, we reveal how professional's attitudes, views, and knowledge do not necessarily match forensic research findings. Witness issues will then be discussed concerning research community. The study identifies some of the key factors that can alter or improve forensic dynamics during the interviewing process. This study focuses primarily on forensic dynamics relating to the interviewing young children and the associated challenges.
Expert knowledge and attitudes
It has been proven that professionals and social researchers (biased) towards information confirming their initial beliefs by refuting established opinions. Once established, beliefs and impressions challenged to contrary proof. Thus, belief systems and generalization can create a confirmation prejudice that may result in faulty understanding and wrong presentation, adversely affecting important decisions. Regarding child victimization situations, such prejudice may result in dramatic repercussions presenting a serious risk to a person's legal rights or presenting a serious risk to a child's security (Bull, Valentine & Williamson, 2009).
Consider a professional who is requested to assess a kid in a custody case that includes accusations of child sex-related abuse. If the professional has a preconditioned idea that children hardly ever if ever lie about child sex-related abuse, the professional might ask suggestive questions or take uncertain claims or controversial behavioral signs by the kid to confirm the expert's own prejudice and thus determine that the kid is indeed a victim of sexual abuse. This could cause for the mother or father not only to loss of legal care of the kid but also to loss of reputation and freedom, because of criminal prosecution. In contrast, if the professional has a prejudice that most such situations include false accusations,...
This will result in the wrong determination that the kid is safe with the mother or father when, in reality, the kid is not. Therefore, the professional must try to remain as fairly neutral, impartial, and precise as possible. As mentioned next, studies suggest that experts' knowledge is not always accurate or impartial, or at least, not always reliable with scientific research.
Experts' knowledge and beliefs
Many people like to think that expert's attitude and knowledge are a reflection of scientific understanding that is based on empirical studies. However, skills are not always advised by science. Research has proven that professionals, such as legal professionals and psychologists, are not experienced or qualified than others in properly decoding verbal claims and non-verbal behavior. However, professionals are mostly confident in their assessments than are others. When individuals show confidence that their answers are appropriate, their reactions are more likely to be recognized as appropriate, and in a legal perspective this may be decisive. I the U.S., experts tend to become dichotomized as they often serve as the prosecution or defense experts. This triggers the risk of encouraging dichotomized perceptions of children's capabilities (Bull, Valentine & Williamson, 2009).
Many medical professionals also seem to feel favorably about the use of drawings, play sessions, and dolls as potential resources for forensic work, regardless of cautions from scientists about such methods. Agreement about the stability of different evaluation techniques is still an issue among professionals themselves. In the Oberlander research, 87% of the participants considered that play sessions were useful. Ninety percent responded that drawings were useful while 46% indicated that baby dolls were useful (Bull, Valentine & Williamson, 2009). Other reviews show that the most questionable techniques are not frequently used in the U. S although relatively new rewards in the community have called for prop-aided interviews as a new evidence collecting strategy. When questions and interventions are presented as verbal interviews…
Interviewing Intoxicated Individuals: Specific Issues and How to Deal With Them Unfortunately, there are gaps in procedures in regards to how to deal with intoxicated suspects and witnesses or those individuals being interviewed who have a substance abuse problem. This lack of clear guidelines often causes confusion and other issues when law enforcement has to interview such individuals. Law enforcement has to deal with a number of issues here, including how
Step 3: Discuss the Precipitating Event After relationship is recognized, the emphasis goes to the family insights of the condition, the sequence of proceedings leading up to the predicament, and the issue that started out the sequence of events (Graham-Bermann, S.A., 2002). Consultations inspect when and how the disaster happened, the causal conditions, and how the family endeavored to covenant with it. Step 4: Assess Strengths and Needs The Family valuation of strengths
In that regard, the future applications of Ekman's principles and techniques for identifying concealment of emotions and deception of intentions may improve the accuracy, efficiency, and speed of facial analysis. In general, computer applications are much more capable of analyzing such information accurately than even the best-trained human beings (Ekman, 2003). Deliberate attempts to employ anti-detection techniques to counter the methods of detection introduced by Ekman may indeed be possible
Police Deception is an integral part of the police arsenal during interrogation. The tactics and techniques of deception have been finely honed, and continue to improve to allow for effective interrogation and information retrieval. Within the framework of judicious police interrogation, the techniques and tactics can be employed effectively, efficiently, and ethically. A few, like the Reid Technique, have been criticized for their misuses and for their tendency to create false
Crime Scene Analysis The case study presents a homicide incident, which occurred at 9170 Old Annapolis Road Columbia. The victim was Ashley Nicole Smith, and the investigations identified two suspects who were Scott Jory Jones, and Frederick James Johnson. This case involves a series of events in the efforts to bring the involved into justice. This case study presents an actual case, but the case study does not use the actual
The only medical issues documented in this report are acute findings that potentially relate to the assault or preexisting medical factors that could influence interpretation of findings. Separate medical documentation by examiners and other involved clinicians follows a standard approach -- address acute complaints, gather pertinent historical data, describe findings, and document treatment and follow-up care; and (2) Ensuring the accuracy and objectivity of medical forensic reports by seeking