Gay Rights: Today's Civil Rights Thesis

We are supported in this by a statement which Justice Kennedy made during a 2003 Supreme Court case on the subject, wherein the Justice observed that "gay people have a 'liberty under the Due Process Clause [that] gives them the full right to engage in [intimate] conduct without intervention of the government.' No matter how unpopular a group's sexual norms, he explained, the government may not 'demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime.'" (Masci, 1) This would essentially acknowledge that discrimination against the rights of homosexuals qualifies as a form of civil rights violation, strengthening the legal precedent now becoming an ever greater likelihood. Those parties who have objected have also shown a great deal of resolve, as suggested by their victory in the typically left-leaning state of California. Primarily, this denotes that on both sides of the issue, parties are politically well-organized, given significant swathes of public support and deeply, emotionally...

...

As with Civil Rights movements of the past, the Gay Rights movement is on a path of certain progress but is challenged by no small degree of social, cultural and political obstruction.
Works Cited:

Anitel, S. (2007). Gays' Discrimination at the Workplace Decreases Productivity.

Softpedia. Online at http://news.softpedia.com/news/Gays-039-Work-Discrimination-Decreases-Productivity-70002.shtml

Head, T. (2006). Workplace Discrimination. About: Civil Liberties.

Masci, D. (2008). An overview of the same-sex marriage debate. The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. Online at http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=288

The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF). (2007). The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Home Page. http://www.thetaskforce.org/

Vestal, C. (2009). Same-sex marriage legal in 5 States. Stateline.org. Online at http://www.stateline.org/live/details/story?contentId=347390

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited:

Anitel, S. (2007). Gays' Discrimination at the Workplace Decreases Productivity.

Softpedia. Online at http://news.softpedia.com/news/Gays-039-Work-Discrimination-Decreases-Productivity-70002.shtml

Head, T. (2006). Workplace Discrimination. About: Civil Liberties.

Masci, D. (2008). An overview of the same-sex marriage debate. The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. Online at http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=288
The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF). (2007). The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Home Page. http://www.thetaskforce.org/
Vestal, C. (2009). Same-sex marriage legal in 5 States. Stateline.org. Online at http://www.stateline.org/live/details/story?contentId=347390


Cite this Document:

"Gay Rights Today's Civil Rights" (2009, November 17) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/gay-rights-today-civil-rights-17408

"Gay Rights Today's Civil Rights" 17 November 2009. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/gay-rights-today-civil-rights-17408>

"Gay Rights Today's Civil Rights", 17 November 2009, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/gay-rights-today-civil-rights-17408

Related Documents

Further arguments that gay marriages do not contribute to the greater good are debatable, based largely on faith-based belief rather than empirical research. In the 1930s, sociologist Edwin Schur wrote extensively about the idea of victimless crimes. For Schur, victimless crimes involve an exchange of commodities or services that are socially-disapproved. These exchanges are voluntary and do not cause anyone harm (Schur, 3). Schur himself cited consensual homosexual unions as an example

Ethics & Gay Rights The author of this report seeks to explain and fathom the current debate that is going on as it relates to gays and other "non-traditional" couples like lesbians, transgenders and so forth getting married much like heterosexual couples in the United States have done for centuries. The author of this report shall be truly ethical and say up front that she supports gay marriage but she will

Civil Rights for LGBT Gay Marriage Stacy E. Kratz, LCSW, CAP Issue, Policy, Problem In socio-political countries such as the United States, the strategic and tactical choices existing to defend one's rights and advocate for social change are common. Activists can demonstrate on the streets, or publish and hand out their stories candidly to publicize and air their complaints. They can put together a legal case, and ask the court to order the state

It can also be confusing. Some states have gay marriage as a legal right. Others have domestic partnerships, civil unions, and other terms for things that are the same or similar (Herek, 2006). Whether these options are constitutional is also something that has to be addressed and that is argued about by many scholars and laypeople (Herek, 2006). One of the other concerns that is brought to light where

But in 1973, the American Psychological Association announced that they would be removing homosexuality from the list of recognized mental illnesses, as growing numbers of researchers and doctors realized that it represented fairly normal sexual behavior (Head par. 17). A quick bit of simple arithmetic can tell you that it still took thirty years after the medical community determined that homosexuality was not dangerous or especially abnormal for the law

However, society's consciousness matured and grew in understanding of what a loving community is, and came to realize that to exclude other human beings based on prejudice is not God's love, but rather fear and ignorance (Conan). According to Kohut, 14% of the general population in American society believes that homosexuality is due to upbringing, 42% believe it is a matter of lifestyle, and 30% believe people are born homosexual