Gevo Strategy Essay

Length: 5 pages Sources: 4 Subject: Energy Type: Essay Paper: #15099112 Related Topics: Fracking, Alternative Energy, Market Entry Strategy, Reading Strategies
Excerpt from Essay :

Gevo

Forces Affecting Industry Conditions

There are several forces that are affecting the industry conditions. With respect to external forces, technology is the major force. Technology has long been the driver of the alternative fuels business. The objective of the business is to produce fuels that are cheaper, more plentiful and more sustainable than fossil fuels. Without these characteristics, there is no viable business. However, the fuels need to have these traits in relation to each other, because alternative energy, and biofuels in particular, are substitutable. As a consequence, competitive advantage goes to the company with the technological advantage. It appeared for a time that GEVO might be that company, but 2012 sales were far below expectations, indicating that perhaps the company's product is not as compelling as it sounds. Most of GEVO's competitors are large multinationals that can dedicate tens of millions, if not hundreds of millions, to the development of alternative energy. As a result, of such investment, it is likely that for the next 1, 3 and 5 years innovation will continue to be the main driver of the alternative energy and biofuels businesses. The key for GEVO is where it will be positioned in terms of its innovation.

The second force affecting the industry conditions is the role of government incentive. During the initial research & development phases, alternative energy sources are typically not viable economically. In order for them to become so, there usually needs to be some sort of research support, often from government if there is no parent corporation to provide it. For GEVO, the ability to tap into alternate revenue sources would be instrumental to offset some of the high costs of the business while it refines its product and finds new applications for it, in order to generate more revenue. This force presently has more potential to be a game-changer than actual impact. Over the next 3-5 years, however, this force could be more important.

The third force affecting the industry conditions is the overall state of the economy. Macroeconomic forces are important because of cross-price elasticities in energy. The Energy Information Administration (2012) notes that cross-price elasticities in energy vary by region and type of energy. For GEVO's product, the exact cross-price elasticities are not known, but what is known is that a lower price of oil will diminish the propensity to substitute biofuels. This propensity is unlikely to change much in the coming years, but the price of hydrocarbons should continue to fluctuate. There are a number of factors the point to a long-run continuation of the trend of rising hydrocarbon prices, which would result in rising demand for biofuels (Heinberg, 2011). However, fracking has lowered prices in the short run, so in the 1-3-year time frame it is not expected that biofuels will get much increase in demand but 5+ years they should, because of the long-term trend line in hydrocarbon prices.

Overall, these forces are going to govern the viability of GEVO, along with the company's own technology, over the course of the next 1-5 years. Innovation (competition) and cross-price elasticities are going to be the most significant factors, the latter depressing demand for biofuels in the next year years but restoring to a long-run increase in demand. The wildcard demand influencer is policy, but there are not expected to be major rollbacks in policy, resulting in relatively slow, sustained growth, but focused on existing applications (Pinto, 2011).

Competitors

The impact of these forces is going to be greater on GEVO than it is on the competitors. The reason...

...

GEVO needs the forces to align favorably right now; Exxon, DuPont do not. Amyris is in roughly the same position financially as GEVO is and therefore is going to be affected to the same degree as GEVO to all three of these trends. Amyris and GEVO are competing in terms of technological advantage. Whichever of these two will develop the best biofuel solution is likely to be the one that succeeds in the marketplace, unless the two companies develop different applications for their products. The industry is too small for troubles in this industry to be considered a threat to either Exxon or DuPont, but these firms may decide to exit the business if they feel that the business lacks long-term viability.

Industry Life Cycle

The biofuels industry is either at the introduction stage of the life cycle. The technology and market are both in a state of development. The economics of the biofuel divisions of the major companies are not known, but both GEVO and Amyris are not making money, and face some uncertainty if demand in the industry does not improve. In the meantime, they need to invest in technology in order to be at the top of the industry when demand does pick up. Pinto (2011) notes that biofuels are expected to experience slow but steady growth in both supply and demand in the coming years. There is the risk that in North American demand will outstrip supply by 2020, and this could happen earlier given positive changes to the economic incentives from government.

Still, the growth rate is not very high at present, and by 2020, biofuels are expected to hold only 2-3% for biodiesel. Most of the growth in North America is expected to be in ethanol, rather than emerging technologies (Pinto, 2011). Thus, the product remains in the introductory stage and the challenge for the firms in the industry will be to move this product beyond the introductory stage as the economics of the industry are poor at this stage -- economies of scale are needed to make this business profitable. Moreover, there is no clear answer to the question "who are your customers?," because has only earned $6.5 million for the first three quarters of 2013, and the figure is declining each quarter. There might not be any customers anymore.

The lack of profitability in this industry, but a high potential profitability in the long run, makes for an interesting competitive dynamic. There are a few different competitors in the space, but many of the larger ones are not committed to the industry -- their presence is more exploratory in nature, because they can afford to participate and there is growth potential eventually. There are fairly low barriers to entry at this point, however. The cost of equipment is relatively low -- it is the same equipment used in ethanol production. The amount of research expenditure is relatively low as well, and certainly is low enough than any major energy company can enter the space and play catch-up quickly.

The pace of technological change is expected to be rapid on two fronts. The first is that the pace of innovation is expected to be high, because firms want to create better products, and leapfrog each other, in order to bring the best biofuel products to market. The second element is with respect to scale -- there will be considerable development with respect to scale in this industry over the next 5-10 years in order to enhance its viability. For now, and for the coming couple of years, however, the industry has a low level of profitability. Only with government subsidies would this industry be profitable in the coming few years, and technological innovation will dictate the long-run profitability of the industry. As Porter predicts, niche industries with many competitors, slow growth and high fixed investment are likely to be unfavorable, and have a high level of competitive intensity as firms are essentially jockeying for industry leadership several years into the future. Larger competitors can spend…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

EIA. (2012). Fuel consumption in power generation and elasticities of substitution. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Retrieved March 31, 2014 from http://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/fuelelasticities/pdf/eia-fuelelasticities.pdf

Heinberg, R. (2011). Rising hydrocarbon costs: A quick summary for policy makers. Resilience. Retrieved March 31, 2014 from http://www.resilience.org/stories/2011-07-06/rising-hydrocarbon-costs-quick-summary-policy-makers

MSN Moneycentral. (2014). Various pages. Retrieved March 31, 2014 from http://investing.money.msn.com

Pinto, M. (2011). Global biofuels outlook 2010-2020. World Biofuels Markets. Retrieved March 31, 2014 from http://www.unece.lsu.edu/biofuels/documents/2013Mar/bf13_04.pdf


Cite this Document:

"Gevo Strategy" (2014, March 31) Retrieved May 7, 2021, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/gevo-strategy-186499

"Gevo Strategy" 31 March 2014. Web.7 May. 2021. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/gevo-strategy-186499>

"Gevo Strategy", 31 March 2014, Accessed.7 May. 2021,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/gevo-strategy-186499

Related Documents
Biofuels to Dissect Locust Guts
Words: 3671 Length: 10 Pages Topic: Genetics Paper #: 9348571

Importance of locust guts for this Study Prediction of the increase in the worldwide energy consumption by 54% between 2001 and 2025 has led to the considerable interest in the production of bioenergy to meet the future needs. Energy derived from biofuels is converted from the metabolism of living organisms. Typically, biofuels has been identified by scientist and environmentalist as the most promising alternative to petroleum and fossil fuels. Biofuels are

Biofuel the Search for Alternative Energy Has
Words: 2302 Length: 8 Pages Topic: Energy Paper #: 62009908

Biofuel The search for alternative energy has been a major issue over past 30 years. In recent months there has been an increased amount of urgency concerning reliance upon fossil fuels. The purpose of this discussion is to examine biofuel as a source of alternative energy. The research will focus on determining the impact that biofuel may have on the current energy crisis. Let us begin this discussion by defining the

Biofuels the Department of Agriculture
Words: 807 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Energy Paper #: 88084247

Biofuel from corn is, at presently, relatively inefficient. Surveys indicate that at best biofuel generates 1.3 times the energy it costs to product (Jaffe, 2007); several studies indicate it generates less than what it costs to produce (Wald, 2007). Moreover, natural gas is the standard fuel required in ethanol production and our production already does not match our consumption (Ibid.). As a result, we do not see biofuel as a

Renewable Energy Biofuels Are Becoming
Words: 2483 Length: 9 Pages Topic: Energy Paper #: 60664576

Thus, the sole remaining major precursor to success is economic utility, which is a function of the cost of second generation biofuel production compared with the production costs of alternatives. Gasoline is the main competitor of concern, given the stated objectives of both American and European governments of using second generation biofuels to displace gasoline consumption in the coming years and decades. At current crude oil prices, there is a

Brazil Biofuel This Work Will
Words: 2030 Length: 7 Pages Topic: Energy Paper #: 80783226

The economy may be strong in some areas but weak in others as the fuel industry seeks to deprive the culture of traditional food bearing crops, in exchange for fuel bearing ones, and decreases the biodiversity of the nation in the process. "... with ethanol and biodiesel as a springboard, Brazil's President...Lula da Silva aims to turn his country into an energy superpower --...environmentalists warn that although bio-fuels reduce

Environmental Science: Biofuels Biofuels: Environmental
Words: 374 Length: 1 Pages Topic: Energy Paper #: 97413626

The technique used in this process is quite simple and reported to be that as follows: "The fish would gobble up the algae and then be harvested, cooked and pressed to extract fish oil -- a method already used to produce omega-3 fatty acid dietary supplements." (Gold, 2009) p.1 Presently there is a testing on fish mixtures for the best production quality at a testing site owned by LiveFuels in San