The global "mindset" that companies must have is defined as "…the ability to develop and interpret criteria for business performance" that are not relying on the "assumptions of a single country, culture or context to implement those criteria appropriately…" (Begley, et al., 2003). Begley and colleagues insist that the "truly globalized corporation" sees globalization as more of a "mind-set" than a "structure" per se (p. 1).
The three mind-sets that managers and executives must be able to demonstrate include: a) first, think globally and recognize the things that help to create a "…consistent global standard"; b) secondly, think locally because in the process of becoming "truly global" a company must come to a deep understanding of "local and cultural differences"; and c) third, the authors assert that the strategy should be to "think globally and locally simultaneously" and be cognizant of those situations in which there are "compelling demands" from both global and local elements (Begley, p. 1).
Getting a company into the global mind-set must start with executives and managers, Begley writes; they must pull the "structure, process and power levers to activate it"; and once that happens, there are more challenges as the "…newly globalized lower-level managers will pull their levers to convert employees in cascading fashion through critical parts of the company" (p. 1).
Z.S. Demirdjian writes in the Journal of American Academy of Business that the way that globalization has taken hold in many of the world's economic powerhouses reminds him of a kind of "fever." The author likens the current "globalization fever" to the California Gold Rush of 1845 (Demirdjian, 2005, p. 1). In that gold rush some of the prospectors found gold but others got nothing "…but gravel and sand," hence the implication is that not all companies will enjoy success in the globalized world that is emerging, Demirdjian believes.
The salient questions to be asked -- and the challenges to companies -- according to Demirdjian are these: a) is globalization a "panacea to eradicate world ills and disparities between the haves and have-nots?"; or b) is globalization...
In the 1990s, once globalization had momentum and it was obvious to many observers that "decent work" wasn't the end all in terms of solutions, Munck continues. Is "decent work" just a "backward-looking utopianism" as Waterman (2008) insisted it is? Yes, Munck agrees it is a bit utopian, because its promise is based on "the myth of a golden era of social harmony" and yet, a "decent work" movement could
Globalization arguably began even before Marco Polo’s expeditions, possibly being traceable to Alexander the Great’s establishment of overland routes between Eastern Europe and India. The assumption that globalization equals Americanization is profoundly arrogant, and is also ignorant of the history, meaning, and implications of globalization. Globalization implies integration and interdependence of the world. Predating the United States of America, globalization nevertheless reached a peak in the 20th century, when a
That said, Goodhart believes that global governance, if pushed too far into sovereign nations' doings, can in fact undermine popular sovereignty as "a viable conception of democracy" but it is not doing that and in fact, in a globalized world that is increasingly interdependence needs a new kind of democracy. The new sovereigntists' views are normative while Goodhart's are more along the lines o positivism. Basically, Goodhart argues that
Globalization has become a ubiquitously word in the last few decades. Much of the globalization trend is driven by the fact that many organizations operate internationally and supply chains have become sophisticated, complex, and spans the entire globe. As a result of globalization, many organizations have tried to proactively create a level of homogenization and standardization internationally of markets, resources, and labor. When international companies can have access to foreign
Globalization's Effect on the United States' National Security Objective of this paper is to explore the impact of globalization on the United States national security. The study defines globalization as the increasing global relations of people, corporate organization and government. There is no doubt that the globalization provides numerous benefits to the American economy. Despite the benefits derived from the globalization, the advent of globalization also provides some threats to the United
Globalization and National Security While the economic benefits of globalization have been frequently discussed, the very serious national security vulnerabilities which have arisen as a result of increase interconnections, both economically and socially, has garnered much less attention. The current literature on globalization either omits national security discussions entirely, or conducts them from a relatively myopic perspective The 2010 National Security Strategy attempts to rectify this, but its seems to have little effect
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now