Glorious Cause: The American Revolution Middlekauff, Robert. Book Review

PAGES
3
WORDS
950
Cite

¶ … Glorious Cause: The American Revolution Middlekauff, Robert. The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.

Robert Middlekauff, born in 1927 in Washington state, holds a B.A. from the University of Washington and a Ph.D. from Yale. He saw active duty as a lieutenant in the United States Marine Corps in Korea from 1952-54. For most of his long career he has been a professor of history at the University of California at Berkeley. In addition to The Glorious Cause (1982), his published books include Ancients and Axioms (1963), The Mathers (1971), and Benjamin Franklin and His Enemies (1996). Dr. Middlekauff received the Bancroft Prize in 1972 and the Commonwealth Gold Medal in 1983. He is listed as a historical educator in Who's Who in America where this biographical information was obtained.

This work, a narrative historical study of the American Revolution, and the first volume to appear in the Oxford History of the United States, reveals the complexities of the years between the signing of the treaty of Paris in 1763 and the election of George Washington in 1789. Although he does not intend his title to be ironic, the author recognizes that the cause of the American revolution "had its inglorious side, and the Americans' manner of advancing it was sometimes false to the great principles they espouse." (vii) Middlekauff's purpose is to present both the achievements and failures of the American...

...

His thesis is that our patriots and revolutionaries were not perfect, yet in learning "to see things as they are and to imagine how they might be," (665) they created a vision, fought for noble causes, endured their own imperfections and created the foundations for our country.
Through the work of this scholar the reader learns that the road to liberty was not as swift or smooth as we may have learned in high school history. He leads up to the Revolution with Jennifer Hartley-2

Dr. Jones detail that is exciting and fresh compared to most historical works. The importance of the Seven Years' War, to Britain's later tactics is illuminating. The author reveals how colonists carried the burden of the fighting against the French in North America, expecting to be permitted to return to self-government at the end of the war. Britain's new King and Parliament, however, had a fresh awareness of the potential for wealth to be found in the American colonies. The extensive details of British debate over colonial issues offers insightful background, making it clear how the British came up with those objectionable tax laws to which the colonists, with their ideals of democracy and liberty, just had to rebel. The evolution of the details of that rebellion, first political, and finally, through violence, is superbly presented by Middlekauff.

As Middlekauff examines the causes of the war, the reader feels the drama and anguish of decisions and…

Cite this Document:

"Glorious Cause The American Revolution Middlekauff Robert " (2002, April 28) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/glorious-cause-the-american-revolution-130939

"Glorious Cause The American Revolution Middlekauff Robert " 28 April 2002. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/glorious-cause-the-american-revolution-130939>

"Glorious Cause The American Revolution Middlekauff Robert ", 28 April 2002, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/glorious-cause-the-american-revolution-130939

Related Documents

The second of Middlekauff's major theses is that the colonists were overmatched, militarily, and that the superiority of England's troops almost meant a victory for England. In many history books, the Revolutionary figures are portrayed as almost super-human, and their victory against England's forces is portrayed as almost divinely mandated. The reality was much uglier and more vivid, and Middlekauff goes into painstaking detail about those battles. While most know

..our troops behaved well, fighting with great spirit and bravery." Giving Washington too much credit would be a mistake, but he had a way of keeping his men on task. And yet, when Washington tried to get his troops to swear allegiance to the United States, "they refused...'New Jersey is our country!' they said stubbornly" (Bowen 7). Still, the relationships between the men who were outnumbered by the British was an

The dozen years prior to the Constitutional Convention was a period in which the "rich and wellborn" exerted considerable influence. These people consisted of merchants, bankers, and big landowners, and they had the power to make themselves heard and thus to press for their particular view of what shape the new nation should take. The U.S. was not the egalitarian society it has been painted to be but was instead

American Revolution: Competing for the Loyalty of the Colonists The American Revolution had many causes, both economic and social in nature. It had also been brewing for many years, ever since the conclusion of the Seven Years' War with the French, in which the British government closed settlement of the West to the colonists. In doing so, the Crown posted soldiers on the Western frontier to keep Americans out of it,

In the end these early attempts at independent diplomacy, a radical notion in and of itself retained foreign aide from France, despite its early misgivings. This in a time that diplomatic aide to a rebellion would be seen as grounds for a new war the French recognized the Americans as an entity in need of aide and provided 1 Million livres for munitions for the Americans, in secret of

However, when the issue of taxation without representation became a general rule in the British Parliament, the Americans viewed it as a breach in their freedoms and power of decision. Therefore, this dilution of liberal rights also led to the desire for independence and separation from the British Empire. From this point-of-view, the three politicians are seen as the promoters of these freedoms. Washington, as the first acting U.S.