Achieving and Maintaining Individual Excellence
For any organization, effectively motivating everyone is the key to ensuring their continuing happiness and well-being. This means that the strategies which are used will have an impact on how they feel about the management and the firm. Those organizations which understand and can apply flexibility in the process are more capable of connecting with them. To fully comprehend which approach is the most efficient requires carefully examining three different theories. During this process, there will be a focus on managing the environment, planning / program design, organizational design, human resource development, supervision, financial management, information systems, program evaluation, leadership, personal mastery, mental models, shared vision, team learning and systems thinking. Together, these elements will highlight how to use these tools to motivate and encourage everybody to do more. (Cherry, 2013) (Beck, 2004) (Weiner, 2013)
Managing the Environment
Job satisfaction is when an employee will have positive or negative attitudes related to their work. Organizational commitment occurs after an individual feels a sense of respect, fairness and is willing to go the extra mile for the firm. These factors are interconnected, as both have a direct impact on the person's outlook, levels of motivation and if they will do more for their employer. This serves as personal driving and restraining forces. (Akanbi, 2013)
However, they are different, as job satisfaction is one step to help a person feel committed to the organization. This is because the two build off of each other and are necessary for establishing the strongest beliefs. These factors work in stages and continue to evolve with the individual using various thoughts and emotions to determine if satisfied they are with their work / position. Once someone has established favorable views, is the point this will make them more dedicated to the company in the longer term. This is when they are willing to help the organization achieve key objectives and is utilizing their talents to enhance its performance. (Akanbi, 2013)
Maslow's Theory of needs is focusing deprivation and growth. Deprivation occurs at the lower ends of the spectrum under this model. The most notable include: psychological, social, esteem and self-actualization. Growth takes place when the basic needs are met and the individual wants to have something that will help them to be more fulfilled as a person. Addressing the most basic requirements (i.e. psychological) will lead to the individual wanting to have a sense of accomplishment in their lives. This is a desirable force that encourages everyone to embrace specific attitudes and beliefs. ("Want to Motivate People," 2010)
Planning the Program Design
The program will focus on addressing the needs of the person and building upon them to have the greatest influence possible. The personal driving force will is concentrating on what is most important to everyone and addressing these basic needs. While at the same time, giving them the flexibility to adjust their benefits with these needs. This will overcome key issues of resistance by reaching out to someone utilizing greater amounts of flexibility. Once this happens, is the point an individual will have a desire to help the organization in the future. This is when they are willing to go the extra mile to ensure that everyone is successful. ("Hertzberg's Theory of Motivation," 2010)
These objectives are achieved utilizing Hertzberg's Theory of Motivation. It is concentrating on two areas to include: hygiene and motivation factors. Hygiene is the most basic level of motivating someone by addressing their basic requirements. While motivation, is seeking to have a greater sense of empowerment. This is similar to Maslow's theory by showing, how their basic needs must be met to have greater levels of empowerment. While at the same time, it is different from Maslow's concepts through having more levels to experience in order to have greater levels of fulfillment. ("Hertzberg's Theory of Motivation," 2010)
Organizational Design
The organizational that will be implemented is the incentive approach. This will be accomplished by conducting a survey and understanding what programs are most important to employees. These responses will be used to create a series of general benefits programs. The employee can add or select certain ones at any point in time. They will be explained to everyone through a series of seminars and one on one interviews with HR personnel. This will help them to see the benefits and how they can assist them over the long-term. The implementation design is focusing on enacting these programs in a series of stages. This will make it easier to make adjustments and ensure that the program is meeting the needs of employees. (Cherry, 2013) (Beck, 2004)...
Goal-Setting & Task Performance In the journal article "Managing time: the effects of personal goal setting on resource allocation strategy and task performance," authors Strickland and Galimba (2001) centered their discussion on the relationship between goal setting and task performance among undergraduate students. Using an experimental design for the study, the authors explored whether goal-setting influences task performance or not. Furthermore, they also determined whether there are differences between the task
Goal Theory Components of goal theory and its benefits in the workplace The goal theory suggests that by allowing employees to set goals, they can be influenced to work harder to meet these goals by motivating them. This will lead to a significant boost in employee performance and translate to benefits for the organization as well. The basic principles of the goal setting theory are clarity, commitment, challenge, complexity, and feedback. The
Goal Setting Theory Application The goal setting theory was a product of the research conducted by Edwin Locke and Gary Latham who carried out more than 400 separate studies in this regard. They indicated that goals have a pervasive effect on the behavior of the people working within a given organization hence there is need for care and attention while setting goals since with the right conditions, goals can be powerful
Goal - setting theory (Curtis 37) starts with the situationally specific, conscious motivational factors closest to action: goals and intentions. Goal theory then works backward to determine what causes goals and makes them effective. The specific, close-to-action goal - setting approaches have been more successful in explaining performance than the general, far from-action motivational approaches that stress general needs and motives based on subconscious values. Only when ideas become goals
Goal Setting Theory Describing Goal Setting Theory and Summarizing a Sample of Research on the Theory Goal-Setting Theory: Overview and current research Description Goal-setting theory was first developed by (Locke & Latham 2005) for the benefit of industrial/organizational (I/O) psychology. The theory's basic tenant is that setting higher goals lead to higher levels of task performance vs. easier or more abstract goals. The follower must be committed, have the ability to accomplish the goal,
Locke's Goal-Setting Theory Most people want and need to know what is expected of them in the workplace, and Locke (1964) proposed that goal-setting theory can help explain why. Subsequently, Locke (1996) conceptualized goals as being the objective or purpose that serves to guide individual actions at work (Perrone & Smith, 2003). The main points of Locke's goal-setting theory are as follows: Specific high goals lead to higher performance than setting
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now