Group Decision-Making Process. Identify Successful Unsuccessful Experience Essay

¶ … group decision-making process. Identify successful unsuccessful experience group decision making. Discuss factors affected group's effectiveness, drawing concepts readings. Please include headings sectional headings. Group decision making

The decision making process is pivotal within any organized group and it influences the ultimate success of the overall entity. In modern day times, the organizational leaders no longer make and implement decisions top down, but engage their subalterns in the decision making process.

The group decision making process

The group decision making process is virtually understood as an organized effort in which various members of a group discuss a situation and make a mutually agreed upon decision. In a more professional formulation:

"Group decision making is a type of participatory process in which multiple individuals acting collectively, analyze problems or situations, consider and evaluate alternative courses of action, and select from among the alternatives a solution or solutions" (Barnett).

The primary advantage of group decision making is that it capitalizes on the expertise of all of its partners, and the final decision relies on the specialized input of all team members (Levi, 2010). By making such well informed decisions, the group maximizes its changes for overall success (Schafer and Crichlow, 2010).

Nevertheless, aside from the benefits, group decision making also reveals a series of shortages, the most important of them being the potential for a decision to not be reached due to...

...

In such a context, it is important to establish the rules by which decisions are made, in case of failure to agree. Some methods in this sense include the decision by authority, the decision by majority, the decision by negative majority or the decision by ranking (University of Waterloo).
3. Successful experience with group decision making

An important aspect of group decision making is that it generates brain storming ideas which deal with numerous issues, aside the actual decision itself. For instance, the group members could come to discuss the potential impacts of the decision and could as such make a better informed decision (O'Connell and Cuthbertson, 2009).

This was also the case during a work related meeting, when the team members were trying to decide upon the vacation times and how these should be synchronized during the winter season. Everybody wanted to take time off, but challenges were continually raised about who would cover for one or the other. Eventually, it was agreed that the entire firm would be closed for one week during the holydays. This decision generated high levels of employee success, and added to the operational efficiency and motivation.

4. Unsuccessful experience with group decision making

A major downside of group decision making is represented by the fact that the level of democracy might sometimes be too high within the group, and this might lead to delays in the final decision to be made (Gastil, 1993). Such a situation occurred within a marketing team, trying to…

Sources Used in Documents:

References:

Barnett, T., Group decision making, Reference for Business, http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/management/Gr-Int/Group-Decision-Making.html#b last accessed on March 28, 2012

Borchers, T., 1999, Decision making, ABACON, http://www.abacon.com/commstudies/groups/decision.html last accessed on March 28, 2012

Dine, J., 2000, The governance of corporate groups, Cambridge University Press

Gastil, J., 1993, Democracy in small groups: participation, decision making and communication, John Gastil
Kameda, T., 2011, Effects of two procedural factors on group decision making: deliberation style and assigned decision rule, Ideals, http://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/21912 last accessed on March 28, 2012
Group decision making, University of Waterloo, http://cte.uwaterloo.ca/teaching_resources/tips/group_decision_making.html last accessed on March 28, 2012


Cite this Document:

"Group Decision-Making Process Identify Successful Unsuccessful Experience" (2012, March 29) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/group-decision-making-process-identify-successful-78890

"Group Decision-Making Process Identify Successful Unsuccessful Experience" 29 March 2012. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/group-decision-making-process-identify-successful-78890>

"Group Decision-Making Process Identify Successful Unsuccessful Experience", 29 March 2012, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/group-decision-making-process-identify-successful-78890

Related Documents

Decision-Making Process in Business Environment The activity of decision-making may be defined as mental processes leading to the choosing of one alternative out of many. All decision-making processes generate an ultimate choice. Decision-making output may be a chosen view or action. Broadly, decision-making represents a process of choosing between numerous alternatives and making a commitment to adopting some particular option for the future (Masood). The Nature of Decision-Making Successful decision-making, realizing where one has made the

2002, p.3) The following example from the experience of the group serves to illustrate the way in which these theoretical perspectives applied to the evaluation of the group's ability to function successfully. As noted in the previous section, the group was faced with a crisis when the tour guide was injured by a lion. In terms of the above theory the group should have been able to communicate under stress

picture of how nonprofit organizations balance their procurement processes by applying a phenomenological method to investigate the procurement methods, by categorizing the knowledge of participants. This involved the analysis of survey results in order to pinpoint the fundamental challenges that nonprofits face in conjunction with finding a means of improving the procurement processes. This was an investigation founded on an intensified approach to epistemology. Other models, such as the

Most of these historical leaders were usually from the upper classes with a few of them from lower classes having the opportunity to lead. Consequently, this led to the idea that leadership had something to do with proliferation. This theory was also based on the assumption that leaders are born and not made (Cherry n.d.). This is the belief that leaders are excellent people, born with intrinsic qualities and

(Consensus Decision-Making: g8-binder.emmett) According to laboratory studies undertaken by Professors Martin Kocher and Matthias Sutter reported in the Economic Journal, it was revealed that teams definitely surpass individuals in arriving at economic decision-making. The two researchers demonstrate that the type of decision maker- an individual or a team makes a vital difference in an interactive economic environment, regardless of it being the investment and marketing strategies of companies and funds

Leadership, according to La Monica (1938), is when a person has authority that is recognized by others, and the person has followers/subordinates under them, who believe that the person will assist them in attaining certain goals (carrying out specific objectives for the followers). Furthermore, anyone that is willing to assist and help others could be referred to as a leader (p.8) Leaders see what others do not Most leaders have