Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Guerrilla Government and Waldo's Map of Ethical Obligations of a Public Servant
Public administrators are frequently faced with conflicting interests that demand a subjective analysis that can lead to suboptimal outcomes unless their professional obligations are taken into account. To gain some additional insights into these issues, this paper provides an explanation of the Nevada Four guerrillas' competing obligations using Waldo's map of ethical obligations of a public servant. An explanation concerning the impact of the guerrillas' actions on the individuals involved, the organization, and public policy is followed by a discussion concerning this author's disagreement with their actions and why.
Review and Discussion
The term "guerrilla government" is used to describe actions that are taken by career public servants that are contrary to the policies of their superiors for various reasons, primarily because they are dissatisfied with these policies but other reasons play a role as well (O'Leary, 2014). In the case of the so-called "Nevada Four's" guerilla government activities in response to the sluggish pace of progress in protecting the Nevada wetlands, these public servants became highly influential sources for reform by covertly releasing selected information that undermined their superiors' policies because they disagreed...
It is noteworthy, though, that rather than working within the system they were professionally obligated to support, they elected to circumvent this system because they believed they held the moral high ground. For instance, O'Leary (2014) notes that, "The Nevada Four had no time for intergovernmental turf fights for several reasons. First, since they hoped to hide most of their actions from those at higher levels in their hierarchies, they could not afford to take credit for their successes" (p. 39).
The fact that the Nevada Four placed their own perspectives concerning this environmental issue above the interests of their superiors is indicative of disloyalty rather than a higher moral position because these individuals had a fundamental responsibility to work within the public administration system rather than covertly sabotaging its efforts. Notwithstanding the fact that the Nevada Four did not seek recognition or reward for their covert actions does not exonerate their actions, but rather reinforces the secretive approach they chose to use to achieve their personal goals. In this regard, O'Leary points out that, "They were dedicated to a goal, not to personal aggrandizement. Protection of the wetlands came first" (2014, p. 39).
Certainly, it is difficult to argue with the…
References
Cooper, T.L. (2012). The responsible administrator: An approach to ethics for the administrative role (6th ed.). New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
Chapter 8, "Safeguarding Ethical Autonomy in Organizations: Dealing with Unethical Superiors and Organizations" (pp. 197 -- 239)
O'Leary, R. (2014). The ethics of dissent: Managing guerrilla government (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Chapter 2, "Guerrilla Government and the Nevada Wetlands"
Guerrilla Government in EPA's Seattle Regional Office In the case study of the 'Guerrilla Government in EPA's Seattle Regional Office', the primary ethical violation seems to be the appointment of John Spencer himself as he was handpicked for the post of EPA regional administrator for Seattle. Spencer was handpicked by Roland Regan and Gorsuch as he was believed to be Gorsuch's good friend. There was no competition for the post and
Public Administration and the Role of the Whistleblower The role of the whistleblower in Public Administration is one that continues to be controversial. On the one hand, some members of the public view the whistleblower as an important player in the maintenance of public service offices and agencies. Individuals like Edward Snowden are seen as patriots because they expose overreach and illegal activity by agencies like the NSA which overstep their
Guerrilla Government Guerrilla warfare is a type of warfare where a small band of fighters (whether professional, militia, or civilian) adopt the tactics of stealth soldiers, using sabotage, ambushes, hit-and-run strategies, etc., in order to exploit their most powerful tools -- mobility and the ability to fly under the radar undetected in order to score direct hits against the opposition, undermine the opposition's infrastructure, and bring down the opposition's system of
Guerrilla Government and the EPA Guerrilla government within the EPA grew out of a response to various failed administrations, which were led by men who did not approach their leadership position with the type of virtue and character that those passionate about the environment and the organization would have preferred to see. Thus, under Russell, for example, the EPA had become a shell of what it was supposed to be, with
..) the subsequent U.S. occupation of the island tied its economy ever closed to the United States as U.S. military governors promulgated laws giving U.S. firms concessionary access to the Cuban market. By the late 1920s U.S. firms controlled 75% of the sugar industry and most of the mines, railroads, and public utilities." (Leogrande and Thomas, 2002, 325-6) The economic dependence on the United States and in particular the high degree
Rioting throughout Belfast and Derry became regular, and culminated in 1969 with the Battle of the Bogside. The confrontation resulted from peaceful marching by Bogside residents that was disrupted by police officers and citizens loyal to the Union. Rioting grew for three days until the British Army was dispatched to renew peace and disperse the crowds that had quickly grown in response. However, the riot was incendiary throughout Northern Ireland,