Hanford Article: Pastor And Bioethics Research Paper

Psychology - Counseling "the Pastor and Bioethics"

Ethics in health care often presents difficulty for pastors. Common professional struggles are experienced by pastoral and health professionals. There are four specific medical issues that often result in issues for pastors. These include: physician-assisted death or euthanasia, complementary or alternative treatments, the exercise of consent to medical procedures by patients or parishioners and families, and the crucial need for the donation of vital organs to save lives. Entrenched within all four of these issues, there is an important religious concern which necessitates the pastor's capability (Hanford, 2006).

Most transplantable organs come from people who have been killed in accidents that result in brain death but leave vital organs undamaged. Physicians are justifiably hesitant to approach family members at the worst moment of their lives to ask them to donate a loved one's organs. Therefore, many hospitals are turning to ministers, priests, rabbis and social workers to request organ donations from grieving families. Asking a grieving...

...

The task requires a pastoral coalition that is based on trust, faith and risking. One must be person oriented, empathic and able to act in response to the feelings of the client or family (Moran, n.d.).
In the article "The pastor and bioethics," Hanford says that organ donation is often blocked because the family of a potential donor has not been informed of the patient's decision to donate. He suggests a list of guidelines that should be put into practice. If the guidelines are followed Hanford believes that malpractice suits would be less likely. In his discussion Hanford mentions the ethical considerations of both duty and rights. He says that both patients and practitioners have rights set down by the Patient's Bill of Rights of 1972. This bill implies correlate duties of practitioners such as where patients have rights to information then practitioners have duties to disclose or give the information for a meaningful transparent consent.

In his discussion of organ donation Hanford overlooks the ethical traditions of divine command,…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Hanford, J. (2006). The pastor and bioethics. Pastoral Psychology, 55(2), 175-182.

doi:10.1007/s11089-006-0044-z

Moran, M. (n.d.). Acting Out Faith through Organ Donation. Retrieved from http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=1042

Pastoral Letter on Organ Donation & Transplantation. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.epc.org/about-the-epc/pastoral-letters/organ-donation-transplantation/


Cite this Document:

"Hanford Article Pastor And Bioethics" (2012, February 16) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/hanford-article-pastor-and-bioethics-54289

"Hanford Article Pastor And Bioethics" 16 February 2012. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/hanford-article-pastor-and-bioethics-54289>

"Hanford Article Pastor And Bioethics", 16 February 2012, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/hanford-article-pastor-and-bioethics-54289

Related Documents

Bioethics: Fetal tissue research and transplantation in the scientific research community has grown to attract huge debate and controversies since the late 1980s when doctors began to conclude that the bodies of unborn babies could be used in tackling certain diseases. This aspect continued to develop as scientists proposed that fetal tissue can also be used in helping infertile couples to have children. This is largely because these tissues can be

Bioethics: Transplant Case Study thorough examination of any "real life" ethical question involves the examination of all of the issues at hand. It is no different for issues of problematic bioethics. Thus, in consideration of the famous "botched heart transplant story," one must ask the salient questions, "what went wrong," "what should have been done," and "what can one do to insure that this issue will be less likely to

If the lungs are forced to keep breathing, such people can continue to digest food, excrete waste, and even bear children" (Cline 2013). In the case of total brain death, "the cessation of functioning in those parts of the brain responsible for consciousness and higher reasoning powers is necessary for the death of the 'person' aspect of the brain and body" has occurred (Cline 2013). Q4. Belmont report principles The 1979

Bioethics -- Assisted Suicide THREE-STEP MODEL-BASED ETHICAL ANALYSIS OF ASSISTED SUICIDE Introduction Assisted suicide, or euthanasia, is a controversial topic because it contradicts one of the most fundamental values of American and other Judeo-Christian teaching: namely, that human life is sacred. Similarly, in medicine, euthanasia violates the Hippocratic Oath, according to which the first ethical obligation of doctors is to do no harm. However, in modern society, that traditional prohibition against assisting others

Religioustolerance.org/euthanas.htm Stem cell research is a new field, one that was not yet envisioned by the apostles or other authors of the Bible. As a revolutionary form of healing, stem cell research and practice may not be entirely in conflict with scripture. Jesus was the ultimate healer, and therefore stem cell research can be viewed as an extension of this gift from God. Moreover, Luke himself was a physician who would

Indeed, by an active participation of the patient, we also tacitly understand that the patient is also fully informed about the course of the medical treatment, about his condition and even about the way scientific research affects his or her illness. On the other hand, this model has several important setbacks. First of all, it is a matter of time and usually a physician is involved with more than one