Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
HBR Cases
From Cuddy et al., "Connect, Then Lead" ~
Do you agree with the statement that "90% of the variance in our positive or negative impressions about people is about warmth and/or strength?
It is difficult to judge this statement because of its complexity. However, intuitively, I feel it is a bit exaggerated but still largely true. When I think about first impressions, they seem to be largely consistent with warmth or strength. Yet there are many more considerations that do not fall into these two descriptions.
Do you agree with the statement that all people need to have a sense of belonging?
I think that having a sense of belonging is a desired state that represents more of a healthy emotional state.
What is meant by "inside-out" as opposed to "outside-in"?
An inside-out approach would be leading with your credentials and trying to appear strong while the outside-in approach would focus more on the other person and appearing caring.
Why is "inside-out" thought to be more effective?
The outside-in approach is a kinder and gentler way to work with people. It can be important to working in teams and building trust.
5) In discussing how to establish empathy with employees, the authors suggest that leaders agree with their worldview. How would a leader know the worldview of the employees?
The best...
It is best to avoid controversial topics such as politics or religion, but there are many others that are acceptable. Free and open dialogue is the best way to establish empathy.
6) What do you think about the author's views on projecting warmth/strength?
I believe that he is right in the idea that warmth is typically a better position than strength. However, there are some instances when it can definitely better to appear strong. I think the trick is to learn how to balance these so that you can take advantage of both positions.
https://hbr.org/2009/07/the-end-of-rational-economics
From Ariely, "The End of Rational Economics"~
1) What is meant by the falsity of standard economic theory? 2) What is meant by the "darkside" of teamwork?
The standard economic theory suggests that all individuals are rational entities that seek to maximize their own personal utility. Most of the economy has been built upon this assumption. The dark side of team's deals with the fact that many people cheat -- it's common. Furthermore, if one person is perceived as cheating then this can increase others rate of cheating as well.
2) What is the "Revenge Motive" all about?
The revenge motive basically states that our emotional state can influence our decisions. In the example…
Revenge Edgar Allen Poe's "The Cask of Amontillado," Andre Dubus's "Killings," and Louise Eldrich's "Fleur" are all short stories about revenge. Although they treat the theme of revenge differently, the authors show that the exacting of revenge can indeed be a satisfying finale to a life consumed by tragedy. In each of these three short stories, revenge is depicted as an act that fulfills the protagonists' deepest need. Therefore, guilt does
The inclusion of an immortal spirit as a key catalytic character in the play underscores Shakespeare's intention. Hamlet states, "For this same lord, / I do repent…I must be their scourge and minister," (Act III, Scene 4). Here, Hamlet clearly sees himself placed in the unfortunate roll of champion of spiritual justice. Antigone is perhaps even more directly concerned with spiritual matters than with mundane law. The realm of human
Revenge is contagious. Titus begins the wave of revenge when he sacrifices Tamora's son. Her reaction demonstrates her humanity in a sense. She is outraged, vows revenge and schemes with Aaron to frame Titus' sons for murder. Revenge is more than simply "getting even" in some cases. For Tamora, revenge involves getting even but doing so in the most painful of ways. Her request for her boys to do away
. that the manslayer who killed any person by accident may flee into.' Willful murderers were not entitled to such refuge from the 'blood avenger,' but accidental killers were entitled to protection until passions cooled. The Bible recognized that the passion for revenge may be just as great against the accidental killer as against the premeditated murderer (124)." Dershowitz is succinct and exact in his analysis, and even the most
(Terry 1070) The play Hamlet therefore reflects this complex change in the honor code and the way that personal elements were being integrated into the traditional view of honor. The characters of Hamlet and Laertes also show this complexity in their motives and actions. Terry points out that there was no clear distinction between the different honor codes at the time but that there was rather an overlapping of elements
Character Comparison Comparison: Revenge and its Motivators in Frankenstein and Wuthering Heights Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and Emily Bronte's Wuthering Heights are two of the most significant literary works in history, both maintaining the ability to remain successful and relevant far beyond the years immediately following their respective publications. While each novel is exceedingly different from one another, with one focusing on the perils brought about by a man-made monster who seeks to