Hebrew Wisdom Diligence And Laziness Comparison Essay

PAGES
5
WORDS
1647
Cite
Related Topics:

Diligence vs. Laziness Diligence and laziness are topics that are extensively covered in the Bible as various authors address several issues relating to these two topics. Much of the focus on diligence and laziness in the Bible is provided in the Hebrew wisdom literature, which is primarily found in the books of Proverbs, Job, and Ecclesiastes. These books provide guidelines for living our daily lives, particularly in relation to diligence and laziness. Hebrew wisdom literature, especially the book of Proverbs primarily focuses on highlighting the differences between the wise and foolish in various contexts including diligence and laziness. This is primarily because diligence and laziness are directly related to wisdom and foolishness respectively. This paper focuses on examining and describing the Hebrew wisdom on diligence and laziness based on wisdom literature in the Old Testament.

Hebrew Wisdom on Diligence and Laziness

The books of Proverbs and Ecclesiastes provide more insights regarding the issue of diligence and laziness. In this regard, the book of Proverbs consistently presents the diligent person as a wise individual whereas the sluggard (lazy) is presented as a fool (Hindson & Yates, 2012). Through this book, Solomon uses the analogy of a sluggard and an ant to demonstrate the difference between laziness and diligence respectively. In Proverbs 6:6 (King James Version), a sluggard is used to refer to a lazy person and contrasted with the ant, which is used to define a diligent person. A sluggard is used to refer to laziness because it’s a slow moving creature that spends most of its time on one spot and passed over by life. On the other hand, an ant is a fast moving creature that work towards achieving its goals through intrinsic motivation.

Based on Proverbs 6:6 (King James Version), a lazy individual can be defined as someone who can’t find adequate motivation to rise out of bed while a diligent person does not need any motivation to rise out of bed. In this case, diligent people are intrinsically motivated to pursue their dreams or goals in life while lazy people struggle to find enough motivation to accomplish their life goals or dreams. As a result, lazy people tend to ignore things and find excuses for things that take place in their lives whereas diligent people are not only aware of things but also take responsibility for their well-being. According to Proverbs 22:13 (King James Version), lazy people tend to find excuses for their behavior...

...

In this regard, the fear of the unknown and excuses end up being self-fulfilling prophecies for a lazy person since he/she accomplishes nothing as shown in Proverbs 22:13; 26:13 (King James Version).
On the other hand, diligence is associated with self-motivation and a determination to accomplish things in life regardless of the surrounding circumstances. Longman (2006) contends that chapters 10-31 of the book of Proverbs demonstrates a sharp contrast between laziness and hard work. In this regard, hard work is described as an important characteristic of diligence unlike laziness. While laziness results in poverty, diligence leads to wealth because of the hard work, which is the premise for getting things done.

Link to Wisdom and Foolishness

In demonstrating the differences between diligence and laziness, Hebrew wisdom literature link them to wisdom and foolishness respectively. According to Hindson & Yates (2012), the book of Proverbs differentiates diligence and laziness through showing the sharp contrast between the life of a wise person and the life of a foolish individual. Diligence is considered as a mark of wisdom while laziness is portrayed as an indicator of foolishness (or folly). The book of Proverbs compares diligence and laziness in 28 separate instances through which Solomon demonstrates that diligence directly corresponds to wisdom while laziness corresponds to foolishness.

As shown in Proverbs 9:10 (King James Version), Solomon contends that the fear of God is the key to obtaining knowledge and wisdom. Fox (2007) contends that wisdom and understanding is at the center of the book of Proverbs and is strongly linked to diligence. The book of Ecclesiastes also makes it clear that the fear of God is the foundation of wisdom, which corresponds to diligence. Therefore, the books of Proverbs and Ecclesiastes postulate that its impossible for an individual to be wise (or diligent) without the fear of God. As shown in Ecclesiastes 2:13 (New International Version), wisdom (diligence) is considered better than foolishness (laziness) to the same extent that light is better than darkness. In this case, diligence is considered as light whereas laziness is considered as darkness. The book of Ecclesiastes further shows that life and wisdom can only be established in the context of the fear of God.

However, there is a clear distinction between worldly wisdom and Godly wisdom when examining…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Fox, M.V. (2007). The Epistemology of the Book of Proverbs. Journal of Biblical Literature, 126(4).

Hindson, E. & Yates, G. (2012). The essence of the Old Testament: a survey. Nashville, TN: B&H Publishing Group.

Longman, T. (2006). Proverbs. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

Pinker, A. (2013, January 1). On the Interpretation of Proverbs 12:27. A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism, 18, 1-8.

 



Cite this Document:

"Hebrew Wisdom Diligence And Laziness Comparison" (2017, August 13) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/hebrew-wisdom-diligence-and-laziness-comparison-2165817

"Hebrew Wisdom Diligence And Laziness Comparison" 13 August 2017. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/hebrew-wisdom-diligence-and-laziness-comparison-2165817>

"Hebrew Wisdom Diligence And Laziness Comparison", 13 August 2017, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/hebrew-wisdom-diligence-and-laziness-comparison-2165817

Related Documents

Ethical Principles A personal ethical code needs to integrate both professional behaviors crucial to institutions, and personal behaviors, owing to their likely effect on an individual's leadership ability. Personal ethical codes should also echo an individual's worldview, as this is important in establishing the key values that have to be dominant in the ethical code. Of the many values identified, the crucial ones include vision, wisdom, service, character, work ethic, communication,