As the report, is highlighting several key points that are outlining the strengths of the system. The most notable include: it will reduce congestion, there will be greater levels of productivity, it will integrate the English rail system with the rest of Europe and it can improve the nation's ability to remain competitive. These different elements are important, because they are showing how this strategy will address Britain's current and future transportation needs. As a result, the information from this source is corroborating the findings from the previous research by illustrating how this plan will meet nation's transportation needs. The differences between these articles are this is talking about specific strategies that can address the concerns of opponents. While this piece of literature is highlighting, the positive benefits and ignoring key elements that are important to all stakeholders in the process. Therefore, this source is providing us with background on how high speed rail is necessary and the way this address Britain's transportation needs in the future. (Britain's High Speed Two 2009) Furthermore, the article that is titled Valuing the Benefits of HS2 (2011), is talking about the benefits of a high speed rail system. This is accomplished by looking at a number of different factors that will have an impact on the project to include: the current benefits / drawbacks of the system, wide economic issues and how this will affect local communities. As there are a number of benefits associated with this program to include: there would be shorter travel times, passengers will be able to save money and this kind of system will attract larger numbers of riders. These different elements are important, because they are showing how high speed rail can save money and address the transportation needs of the country. As a result, the information from this source is providing us with some basic background information about how this can address Great Britain's transportation issues. (Valuing the Benefits of HS2 2011)

Arguments...

The most notable include: future demand has been overestimated, advancements in communication / technology are reducing the number of face-to-face meetings and it is reliant upon heavy amounts of government spending. These different elements are important, because they are showing how there is the possibility that high speed rail could become a major source of losses for the government and private industry. As a result, the information from this source is useful, because it is showing how the projections from the information that were presented earlier are dependent upon everything going right.
Moreover, the article titled Demand for Long Distance Travel (2011), is talking about how many proponents are supporting this kind of program. However, when you look beneath the surface, it is clear that high speed rail will face a number of different challenges. Some of the most notable include: it will have to compete against existing forms of transportation, there are high costs of maintaining this infrastructure and this involves the government spending tremendous amounts of money (when they have a deficit). The information from this source is useful, because it is highlighting how there a number negatives associated with high speed rail. As a result, this is illustrating how if the project is not managed properly it will not meet the needs of the general public. (Demand for Long Distance Travel 2010)

Bibliography

A Better Railway for Britain, 2011.

A Review of High Speed Rail, 2010, Blue Space Thinking Limited.

Britain's Infrastructure High Speed Two, 2009, Department for Transport.

Demand for Long Distance Travel, 2011.

Financial Analysis HS2, 2010.

High Speed Rail, 2011, Green Language.

Valuing the Benefits of…