¶ … articles on high-stakes testing. Specifically, it will review the three articles, and include how the articles changed my personal views on high-stakes testing. Clearly, testing is a necessity in the educational environment, and yet, many forms of testing seem to be more a form of control and labeling rather than a way to accurately measure the student's expected and actual learning outcomes. High-stakes testing may help reinforce the school district's learning standards and outcomes, but it may not be the method most effective in measuring the child's development and learning potential. What is the purpose of educational testing? Ostensibly, it exists to measure a student's progress throughout the school year, but it can also be a measure of the educator and district's success in passing on information from educator to learner. Most parents and professionals want some measure of proof that their children are receiving a quality education that can carry them into the future, and testing helps assess and prove these educational goals. However, often so much importance is placed on test results, that often the student and their needs are overlooked in the process. The introduction of so called "high-stakes" testing to determine if a child should move on to the next grade or graduate has come under fire from many critics for a number of reasons, including the accuracy of the tests themselves, and their ability to correctly measure a student's educational progress. In addition, many critics questioned whether one, high-stakes test could really begin to measure both teacher and student success. In fact, some students...

Some excellent students may falter for a number of reasons on any given testing day, while others may shine, simply because they have mastered the mystery of test-taking, rather than the actual material covered.
High-stakes testing may place far too much pressure on students and teachers, thereby setting them up for eventual failure. Indeed, many teachers may actually "teach to the test," rather than ensure students receive a quality and necessary well-rounded education. This tends to narrow the curriculum and the student's educational experience. This cuts students off from experiencing new information that could lead to new exploration and development, and it also narrows the teacher's focus, removing some of the joy of discovery and creation from the classroom environment. Indeed high-stakes testing may adversely affect teachers just as much as it affects students, by making the teachers so anxious about test results that they become increasingly geared to making sure their students pass the test, rather than making sure the student's receive a high-quality educational experience. This can lead to a negative classroom experience for the students and the teacher, and as researchers, Steeves, Hodgson, and Peterson noted, at least one state's dropout rate increased after the introduction of high-stakes testing. Other researchers note that the tests actually encourage children to leave school when they fear they cannot pass the test, or they fail it. The testing…