Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
We see demonstrators using religious slogans to gain political influence, and Supreme Court justices questioned over whether the Ten Commandments should display on government property.
The issue of separating church and state is one of the biggest conflicts in today's society. According to Cherniss (1998): "For all of the secularization and liberalization of society, religion continues to be a driving force in people's beliefs and behavior. In our own times, in our own country, religion has lost none of its inspiring and disruptive power. It has not, as some critics of American society have claimed, receded from the public sphere, scorned by secularists, mourned by the virtuous, and ignored by the majority. It is present everywhere, and both sustains our societies and threatens our liberties."
While religion and the clergy no longer have the same authority as it did a century ago, religious and quasi-religious leaders and communities remain central to many political movements (Cherniss, 1998). Religious movements dominate our politics. Many states continue to prevent atheists from holding public office, and homosexuals are constantly the victims of discrimination and condemnation.
In addition, when we consider Jefferson's views on politics and religion, his deism, his faith in reason, and his belief in natural rights, liberty, and democracy, were largely influenced by the Enlightenment (Cherniss, 1998). Jefferson's words and arguments in the Declaration often paraphrased John Locke, an Enlightenment leader. The idea of natural rights, which is seen in the Declaration, ultimately derived their authority from a contractual agreement between the governors and the governed, and therefore follow natural rights.
The original draft of the Declaration of Independence passionately denounced the slave trade, which many consider hypocritical, given that Thomas Jefferson was himself a slave owner (NIAHD, 2005). Still, it was the delegations from South Carolina and Georgia who demanded that this line be removed, as the slave trade was necessary to their livelihood. Many historians view this moment in history as the beginning of the breach that would lead to the American Civil War.
Finally, the Declaration states that the just powers of government are derived from the consent of the people (Goldwaithe,...
Many people believe that this statement is hypocritical because this means that as long as one person does not consent, any power exercised over that one person is unjust. If one person does not agree to pay taxes, is it unjust to force him to pay? According to the Declaration, it is unjust to force anyone to obey the law. However, we force all Americans to obey the law in the U.S., rendering this statement hypocritical.
In defense of the Declaration of Independence, it is a declaration for moral independence and provides guidance for the primary moral principles of Americans. In today's society and as far back as the document was created, it is impossible for men to live together voluntarily without government and without laws (Goldwaithe, 1996). There are ignorant and prejudiced people in this country today. The Declaration of Independence was founded in the principle of equal freedom.
However, it would have been more accurate to state, "We hold these principles to be primaries, that all men should be equal in power and in jurisdiction, that they should be endowed by their equals with certain Rights within their individual jurisdictions, that it would be impossible to positively enumerate all of these Rights therefore they must be defined negatively as the Right to behave in a particular way so long as the equality of all others is maintained, that government, per se, should be instituted among men only when disputes over individual jurisdiction arise and then only to secure individual rights (Goldwaithe, 1996)."
This wording would perhaps be more accurate, as it serves more as a moral principle than a strictly legal one. Society needs law and order, and certain parts of the Declaration could benefit from being clarified and improved.
Bibliography
Cherniss, Joshua. (Spring, 1998). Tis Time To Part: Renovating the Wall of Separation Between Church & State. The Yale Journal of Ethics.
Burnside, Julian. (2005). Hypocrisy and Human Rights. Spare Rooms For Refugees. Retrieved from the Internet at http://www.spareroomsforrefugees.com/main.htm.
Goldthwaite, John. (December 17, 1996). Rebuttal Rights Memorandum. Fort Drum, New York: Department of the Army.
NIAHD. (November 5, 2005). Hypocrisy in the Declaration of Independence. NIAHD Journals.
Bibliography
Cherniss, Joshua. (Spring, 1998). Tis Time To Part: Renovating the Wall of Separation Between Church & State. The Yale Journal of Ethics.
Burnside, Julian. (2005). Hypocrisy and Human Rights. Spare Rooms For Refugees. Retrieved from the Internet at http://www.spareroomsforrefugees.com/main.htm.
Goldthwaite, John. (December 17, 1996). Rebuttal Rights Memorandum. Fort Drum, New York: Department of the Army.
NIAHD. (November 5, 2005). Hypocrisy in the Declaration of Independence. NIAHD Journals.
Hypocrisy of Thomas Jefferson Thomas Jefferson, the third President of the United States, has often been accused of racism and double standards. Jefferson paradoxically emphasized the concept of personal liberty but acted contrary to his own writings. In the famous Declaration of Independence, Jefferson advocated for fairness and equality but a bulk of evidence showed that he was in support of slavery and racial discrimination against Blacks. He continued to own
Declaration of Independence Overview of Excerpt from Declaration The excerpt chosen for this paper is one of the most powerful passages in the Declaration of Independence. It packs a punch equal to "We hold these truths to be self-evident…" because it actually states what the Colonies intended to do, and why they fully intended to do it. "…Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these [life, liberty and the pursuit of
Thomas Jefferson and the Declaration of Independence Of all the men known as the Founding Fathers of the United States, perhaps the man most discussed is Thomas Jefferson. He was instrumental in the creation of the country through his participation with the First and Second Continental Congress and in ensuring the successful beginning of the nation following the American Revolution. Besides being Vice President to John Adams, and then the third
However, when these same advocates were faced with the possibility of losing their political power by living in accordance with their own arguments, they admitted that they understood the people they had under their absolute control were men and not animals. Such an admission was tantamount to declaring that they didn't really believe in equality, but instead wanted to protect their own liberty to live their preferred way of
Stressing the shackles that slavery could latch to a man's mind, Douglass was given insight into the inherent transgression behind the bondage. And his ability to adopt such a perspective, while easy to underestimate from the distance of over a century, is quite remarkable given the overwhelming social constructions designed to deter that sort of thinking amongst his demographic. One of the more effective messages that he conveyed both
American Way of War The history of the American Way of War is a transitional one, as Weigley shows in his landmark work of the same name. The strategy of war went from, under Washington, a small scale, elude and survive set of tactics practiced by what seem today to be relatively "quaint" militias, to -- in the 20th century -- a full-scale operation known as "total war." True, "total war"