The 'Reuniting Families Act' would also try to increase the current per country limit of 7% to 10% for the issuing of green cards. This bill, if passed, would also permit widows, widowers and children of those persons who die before the completion of the immigration process to get LPR status. (Shank, Michael Honda to Announce Key Component of Comprehensive Immigration Reform: Reuniting Families); (Reuniting Families Act-2009); (Honda, The Reuniting Families Act (H.R. 2709))
Reuniting Families Act also attempts to stop discriminatory clauses in other immigration rules which prevent permanent same-sex partners to reunite with their families. From the perspective of illegal immigrants, section 245(i) would be more suitable as they will not have to return to their home country before filing a petition for a change of status because if they do return, they might face a possible ban ranging from 3 to 10 years barring them from entering the country. Again, Section 245(i) would clear a larger section of the immigration backlog than the Reuniting Families Act. However, if we consider from the perspective of legal immigrants who have not flouted any rules and have a family waiting to join them, the Reuniting Families Act seems to be a better proposition. (Shank, Michael Honda to Announce Key Component of Comprehensive Immigration Reform: Reuniting Families); (Reuniting Families Act-2009); (Honda, The Reuniting Families Act (H.R. 2709))
Q5. Who supports the Reuniting Families Act and why?
A number of organizations and Congressional leaders support the Reuniting Families Act. Some of these organizations include Human Rights Campaign, Council for Global Equality, Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, New York Legal Assistance Group, American Immigration Lawyers Association -- AILA, Episcopal Church, American Jewish Committee and various labor organizations. Among the Congressional supporters, Michael Honda is supported by Gary Ackerman, Neil Abercrombie, Barbara Lee, Jesse Jackson Jr., Chaka Fattah, and many more. These organizations and people believe that a just and efficient means to achieve a lawful family-based immigration is essential to keep the nation strong. They believe that strengthening family units makes good business sense as strong family units pool in their resources to launch businesses which facilitate creation of more jobs in the U.S. These families buy homes, send their children to colleges and add to the pool of talented and skilled human resource and in the process strengthen American industry and economy.
Proponents of this bill believe that breadwinners can effectively contribute to U.S. economy if they get the support of the family in looking after the elderly, young children and the sick especially in light other unaffordable alternatives. In addition, in light of the fact that America's social security system is in a jeopardized state, families provide the much-needed security for a workforce that is aging. The support for this bill also comes from the hundreds of immigrants who have entered the U.S. legally and have abided by all the necessary rules but are now separated from their immediate family on account of the present status of the immigration system. This bill would prevent many frustrated family members of LPRs from availing illegal means to enter the country and stay with their families. (Stannard; Hendricks, 6); (Section 245(i):...
Its chairman, Bishop John C. Wester (Salt Lake City) expressed his reservations against certain clauses in the bill in a letter to Michael Honda. The president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, Rev. Samuel Rodriguez, has also clearly expressed his views against this bill. According to these religious heads, the basic clause for their opposition is the one which allows legal residency to same-sex couples and provides them immigration benefits. According to the Bishop, such laws for same sex couples would "erode the institution of marriage and family." (Stannard; Hendricks, 6) (Lima, 5)
Rep. Barney Frank (Massachusetts) has not really declared any opposition to the bill but admits that this bill is all the more controversial due to the inclusion of two highly debatable issues in the same bill -- immigration which in itself has been intensely debated upon, and the issue of same-sex. Even those people asking for immigration reforms are divided on the issue of combining the clauses of UAFA or Uniting American Families Act, presented earlier by Jerry Nadler, representative from New York with the new immigration rules. (Santoscoy, Amsterdam Gay Weddings Protest U.S. Immigration Law) Also opposed to this bill are the "Blue Dog Democrats" -- a group comprising of conservative Democrats who are also opposed to the concept of granting legal status to same-sex immigrant couples. (Stannard; Hendricks, 6) (Lima, 5)
According to the director of policy studies in the Center for Immigration Studies, Jessica Vaughan, the skepticism about including the same-sex clause in this bill might result in an increase in fraud since most of such couples do not have a proof like marriage certificates to substantiate their claim of marriage or being permanent partners like other heterosexual couples do. Since the immigration process is totally dependent on furnishing documentations, otherwise heterosexual people may use this chance to pose as same-sex couples. (Stannard; Hendricks, 6) (Lima, 5)
Butterfield, Jeanne A. AILA on 245(i) Provisions.
Dinan, Stephen. Senate Democrats propose amnesty for some illegals. The Washington Times, 10
May, 2002. p. A4.
Ewell, Gordan F. Mexico: Migration, U.S. economic issues and counter narcotic efforts.
Novinka Books. 2005.
Farnam, Julie. U.S. immigration laws under the threat of terrorism.
Algora Publishing. 2005.
Federation for American Immigration Reform. Section 245(i): Adjustment of Status" Mini-
Honda, Mike. The Reuniting Families Act (H.R. 2709).
Jakubowski, Laura. U.S. Policy on Mexican Immigration: The challenges of Legalization.
Lima, Emanuela P. Controversial immigration bill is proposed.
Tribune, 10 June, 2009. p. 5.
N.A. Adjustment of Status under the Legal Immigration Family Equity Act ("LIFE Act").
N.A. Section 245(i): A Matter of Family Unity and Common Sense. February, 2002.
N.A. What Section 245(i) actually does?
U.S. Senate Republican Policy Committee. Senate Likely to Take up House-Passed Border
Security Bill after Easter Recess. March 21, 2002.
Reuniting Families Act-2009. Immigration News, 6 August, 2009.
Santoscoy, Carlos. Amsterdam Gay Weddings Protest U.S. Immigration Law. 24 July 2009.
Shank, Michael. Rep. Michael Honda to Announce Key Component of Comprehensive
Immigration Reform: Reuniting Families. June 2, 2009.
Stannard, Matthew B; Hendricks, Tyche. Gays push for partner immigration rights. Chronicle,
June 6, 2009, p. 6.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Adjustment of Status under Section 245(i) in Context of the Legal Immigration Family Equity (LIFE) Act Amendments (enacted 12/21/00). Employer Information Bulletin 25,
Logical Flaws Analysis: Immigration Laws and Policies As has been seen in the recent debate regarding the issue of the separation of children of immigrants from their parents at the border, immigration is a fraught issue in America. America is a nation built, in part, upon immigration. Many individuals who have immigrated to America illegally form the backbone of a number of industries in the US, spanning from the restaurant industry
8% of U.S. households were headed by an immigrant and received 6.7% of all cash benefits; by 1990, 8.4% of households were headed by an immigrant and received 13.1% of all cash benefits (Borjas, 1995, pp. 44-46). Immigrants in different categories (both legal and illegal) have been eligible to receive certain welfare benefits. Legal immigrants are eligible after three to five years of residence, though asylum applicants and refugees are eligible
Home Security Reforming Immigration Reform Homeland Security Reforming Immigration Reform In current years illegal immigration has turned out to be a topic that has brought up some significant political issues in the United States. A lot of the debate on illegal immigration emphases on a feasible route to United States citizenship. It would need to be pointed out that there are so many more persistent subjects which should be spoken about in
Immigrants Should be Allowed in the US Military and Granted Citizenship One of the major issues that have faced the U.S. Department of Defense is on permitting illegal immigrants to serve in the U.S. military. This issue has become relatively controversial in the recent past because of immigration issues and the need to enhance homeland security. In this regard, there are questions on whether illegal immigrants should be allowed to serve
H-1B Visa In recent years the debate over immigration has taken center stage. In particular, the federal government's H1B visa program has become a particularly contentious issue. Those who oppose the program or the size of the program believe that it takes jobs away from American citizens in fields that have traditionally high pay such as technology. Those who are proponents of the program believe that it is beneficial because it provides
U.S. Immigration Policy After 911 The terrorist attacks on the United States that took place on September 11, 2001 have had a number of far-reaching effects, among which changes in immigration policy must be considered to be of significance. According to Malone (2003), one of the most dramatic changes is that the U.S. immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), which has served as the primary agency overseeing a variety of immigration issues,