Immigration And The Obama Administration Capstone Project

The Obama Administrations Immigration Policy

The Trump Administrations immigration policies have been so devastating for immigrants, it is easy to idealize the past Obama Administrations attitudes towards legal and illegal immigrants. In both rhetoric and policy, the Obama Administration attempted more positive and welcoming attitudes to immigrants compared with President Trump. However, it is important to contextualize Obamas executive outreach in a wider frame of history and not to excessively idealize them, according to legal scholars.

President Obama has had both his detractors and his supporters regarding immigration policy. According to one critic, Kristina Campbell (2010), professor at the University of the District of Columbia David A Clarke School of Law, although policies toward immigration throughout the 21st century as a whole have been highly problematic for immigrants, the Obama Administrations actions still leave much to be desired, in terms of how immigrants were actively detained at the border and a lack of meaningful legislation to protect immigrants and the children of immigrants. But according to Professor Michael Kagan (2016) of University of Nevada, Las VegasWilliam S. Boyd School of Law, the Obama Administrations record is not as problematic as it might seem to be, but rather the result of political and bureaucratic forces and wrangling for power and control.

Specifically, Kagan (2016) argues that by using a mixture of executive actions and prosecutorial decisions, Obamas aim has been to focus enforcement against immigrants caught at the border or with criminal records while easing the path toward integration for others (p.665). Critics have alleged this creates a divide between so-called good and bad immigrants in a manner which is not helpful, while Obamas supporters argue that he is the first president in recent memory to take aggressive action to protect the rights of at least some immigrants who came to the country illegally yet who have made a meaningful contribution to America.

Part of the difference in these views of different law professors in the field of immigration law may lie in the degree to which they view the federal government as powerful in influencing immigration policy. Campbell (2010) argues that the federal government has a unique role in setting immigration policy for the nation. Despite the fact that the US Constitution does not explicitly discuss immigration in its wording, other than to establish rules for nationalization, federal courts have established a so-called plenary power to regulate immigration on the part of federal officials (Campbell, 2010). Thus, Campbell (2010) suggests that a failure to act compassionately towards immigrants lies squarely in federal hands.

Kagan (2016) suggests that the bureaucratic and political reality is far more complicated than this summary. Firstly, President Obama, a child of an immigrant himself, was vocal in advocating for the expansion of DACA (Deferred...…types of sweeping executive actions attempted by the Obama Administration. Arguably, only a president capitalizing upon the value of a so-called bully pulpit, particularly in the second administration tenure when reelection is no longer a factor.

Unsurprisingly, many immigration officers, deprived of the arbitrary power which they had been able to exercise previously, before the Obama Administration began to take a more aggressive hand in setting policy, were upset with the loss of their power. Kagan (2016) notes that the opposition of the ICE union was not atypical in such circumstances, where self-restraint is called for on the part of officials, in exercising their power. On the other hand, he notes that it is not entirely true that all immigration officials are heartless and intent upon separating families (Kagan, 2016). There is always a strong bureaucratic element in any type of such resistance, in the desire of officials to protect their power and the perceived importance of their workin this instance, the perceived importance of detaining immigrants.

Thus, rather than stating that the Obama Administration was either good or bad in regards to immigration, it is more important to view its policies in the context of an America where the political landscape was often solidly opposed to using executive authority to pass reforms. Although the Administrations record may still be problematic in some regards, it did make efforts to pass significant legislation that…

Sources Used in Documents:

References


Campbell, K. (2010). Imagining a more humane immigration policy in the age of Obama: The use of plenary power to halt the state balkanization of immigration regulation.  St. Louis University Public Law Review, 415.


Kagan, M. (2016). Binding the enforcers: The administrative law struggle behind Pres. Obama’s immigration actions. Scholarly Works, 937. https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/937



Cite this Document:

"Immigration And The Obama Administration" (2021, July 28) Retrieved April 23, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/immigration-obama-administration-capstone-project-2176503

"Immigration And The Obama Administration" 28 July 2021. Web.23 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/immigration-obama-administration-capstone-project-2176503>

"Immigration And The Obama Administration", 28 July 2021, Accessed.23 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/immigration-obama-administration-capstone-project-2176503

Related Documents

). Can Afghanistan be part of a containment process that is developed in parallel with a dialogue with Russia? There is no straight answer to this question, but one has reasons to believe that this is potentially an approach used by the new administration. One should note, however, also the fact that stability in Afghanistan is of great interest to Russia as well, which is why the administration in Moscow has

Likewise, U.S. House of Representative George Miller (Democrat-California), chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, emphasized, "A plan of this size was not easy to navigate, and it is not perfect. But I believe it's the best possible plan that could be reached swiftly, under challenging circumstances" (quoted in Dervarics 2009:6). Indeed, part of the president's approach to improving conditions for the business community are far-sighted and will

While people who work with these kinds of issues can present their best guesses, they cannot actually provide proof that the Obama Administration's health care plan is good or bad, or how much it will cost. The 'if only' propositions that are in much of the plan tend to make statisticians and fact-checkers nervous, simply because of the nature of these kinds of propositions -- they rely on the

Immigration at Different Times Immigration in early 1800's and today Immigration has not been ever so easier for people residing across the globe. People have to obey the immigration policies made by countries. This study would give sound coverage to all issues faced by people in northern cities in the early 1800s era. Hence, issues with immigration in past would be compared with current issues to immigration. Millions of immigrants expiated to

Immigration Master Planners: Faculty Development Article This article was very interesting in terms of technology and its usefulness within large organizations. The public tends to think of technology as a means of saving money in market characterized by budget cuts and government defaults. However, upon reading this article, technology is not as efficient as many pundits believe it to be. First, as the article indicates, there is a steep learning curve in

Immigration Reform There is a broad based agreement of a need for immigration reform. In recent months and years, immigration reform has become an important political issue. However, there is some disagreement as to what precisely this reform will look like. On one hand, there is talk about amnesty for illegal immigrants who are currently in the country, an issue that has proved divisive (Grant, 2012). One the other hand, technology