Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Inmate Classification in Iowa
Iowa Inmate Classification
The classification system used for prison inmates is primarily designed to stratify prison populations by their tendency to commit violent acts, either in public or in the prison system (reviewed by Gaes and Camp, 2009). This approach is believed to increase the efficiency of a correctional system by housing nonviolent offenders in less costly facilities and to minimize the negative influence of the worst offenders on the relatively well-behaved, non-violent offenders. The Iowa Department of Corrections recently reviewed its inmate classification system and made significant changes. This essay will examine the classification system in use within the Iowa correctional system and how it affects the inmate distribution.
Iowa Inmate Classification System
Classification of inmates in U.S. prisons can be divided into external and internal (Austin and Hardyman, 2004). External classification determines the custody classification and facility assignment. In Iowa, prisoners are primarily classified as having a minimum, medium, or maximum custody risk level (Prell and Smith, 2008). The impact of this classification system was recently reviewed and changes were recommended that shifted the inmate population towards increasing the size of the minimum risk population. This shift, which affected the female inmate population the most, is expected to improve offender access to rehabilitation programs, increase staff and inmate safety, and lower correctional costs. By comparison, internal classification is used to determine inmate placement within a correctional facility (Austin and Hardyman,...
Internal classification will determine who an inmate is housed with, which rehabilitation programs they may be eligible for, and work assignments.
The classification that will have the biggest impact on the correctional system in terms of safety and cost is therefore custody classification. Custody classification in Iowa was just revised because the old system was found to be inefficient, gender biased, too expensive, out of date, overridden too often, inconsistently implemented, and lacked validity (CJI, 2008). The risk factors that had been used historically to determine custody classification were analyzed statistically to determine which ones were better predictors of future institutional misconduct. The analysis resulted in a new list of recommended risk factors for male inmates, which were offense type, current violence charges, severity of criminal record, time left to serve, severity of disciplinary reports for past 12 months, number of prior disciplinary reports for past 12 months, age, escape history for past 5 years, membership in security threat group, and rehabilitation program and work compliance. The risk factors recommended for female inmates were the same, but were weighted differently based on the risk factor's gender-specific predictive power.
An inmate's risk factor score of 0 to 11, 12 to 24, or 25 to 39 would result in a minimum, medium, or maximum custody classification, respectively (CJI, 2008). The most recent recommended risk factors shortened the prior history used to determine an inmate's custody classification, thereby encouraging yearly reclassification. This will result in a more dynamic classification…
References
Austin, James and Hardyman, Patricia L. (2004). Objective prison classification: A guide for correctional agencies. National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved 23 Jan. 2013 from http://nicic.gov/Library/019319.
CJI (Criminal Justice Institute, Inc.). (2008). Validation and redesign of the Iowa Department of Corrections Inmate Classification System. Department of Corrections, State of Iowa. Retrieved 23 Jan. 2013 from http://www.doc.state.ia.us/Research/IAClassificationReportFinal.pdf.
Gaes, Gerald G. And Camp, Scott D. (2009). Unintended consequences: Experimental evidence for the criminogenic effect of prison security level placement on post-release recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5, 139-162.
MDOC (Mississippi Department of Corrections). (2004). Definition of correctional terminology. MDOC.State.MS.U.S.. Retrieved 23 Jan. 2013 from http://www.mdoc.state.ms.us/Annual%20Report%20PDF/Annual%20Report%2005/A%20-%20Website%20-%20FY04%20Annual%20Report/Introduction/Terminology%20-%20Correctional.pdf.
Prell, Lettie and Smith, Curt. (2008). Inmate custody classification study brings changes. Department of Corrections, State of Iowa. Retrieved 23 Jan. 2013 from http://publications.iowa.gov/13213/1/july08.pdf.
Classification in Prison Classification Systems Classification systems aid in the minimization of the upheaval of prison violence, institutional delinquency, and break out situations. During the past several years, professionals in prisons and those that are employed in correctional systems have worked unremittingly in order for them to improvise their recent approaches in the classification of offenders i.e. In accordance with work, supervision, and programming needs. The process of classification takes place in
Classification The word 'Classification' comes from the word class and it refers to the division of living and non-living things on the predefined criterion. These criteria could be a shared quality such as all animals, plants, human, bacteria; germs etc. are classified as living things because they can be differentiated form a chair, a pen and a phone on the basis of the quality that they breathe. The classification can be
Classification is an important and useful technique that is commonly used throughout the world. It allows large groups of concepts to be broken down into smaller, more manageable groups on the basis of specific and defining characteristics. The concept of classification is relatively simple, despite its utility. Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary defines classification as the "systematic arrangement in groups or categories according to established criteria; specifically: TAXONOMY b: CLASS, CATEGORY." The technique
Classification of Drug Users Drug usage, often identified synonymously with drug dependence, is an individual's utilization of drugs (oftentimes in excess amounts) that provides him/her an experience of psychological and/or physical gratification. Individual who subsist to drug dependence or usage are called drug users, and every drug user is identified and classified into various types. Types of drug users, as discussed in this paper, are mainly determined through frequency of drug
Classification: Drama Drama in simple words can be defined as role-playing. For a more comprehensive definition, we turn to experts. Courtney (1980) defines Drama as, "the human process whereby imaginative thought becomes action, drama is based on internal empathy and identification, and leads to external impersonation (both overt and covert). It is this act of impersonation that creates meaning through interaction with the external world, specially other people. In education such
Classification of Professors The educational system that is being followed in the United States, allows students to grade their teachers. Before marking the grades, students are advised to grade their teachers according to the teacher's efficiency and their commitment to the students. Most students however, grade their teachers according to their affability and not strictly according to their demonstrated abilities as a teacher. For example, it has been observed that in