Intergroup Relations View On Gay Discrimination Article Review

Gay Discrimination -- Study Guide The field study by Hebl, Foster, Man nix and Davidic reveals a number of instances in which gay people are discriminated against. Those instances and situations are marked in this paper with bullet points for clarity and for succinctness. The authors also present details of a research project conducted in a Texas mall; this paper reviews that research and poses five questions after the critique and review of the Texas research project.

In 1996, attitudes vis-a-vis gays and lesbians were still quite biased; a 1996 Gallup Poll showed that half of Americans believe homosexuality is "…not an acceptable alternative lifestyle" (Hebl, et al., 2010, 815)

Earlier, in 1994, a CBS poll showed that 45% of those surveyed believed that relations between gays and lesbians "…should be illegal" (Hebl, 815)

At the time the Hebl article was published, only 11 states had passed laws that protect gay people in the workplace; the authors also point out that bias against gays can be interpersonal and only amount to whispers or someone glaring at a gay person -- and yet these behaviors are also unacceptable and hurtful (816)

The...

...

56%…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Hebl, M.R., Foster, J.B., Mannix, L.M., and Dovidio, J.F. (2010). Formal and Interpersonal

Discrimination: A Field Study of Bias Toward Homosexual Applicants. PSPB, 28(6), 815-


Cite this Document:

"Intergroup Relations View On Gay Discrimination" (2014, January 30) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/intergroup-relations-view-on-gay-discrimination-181749

"Intergroup Relations View On Gay Discrimination" 30 January 2014. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/intergroup-relations-view-on-gay-discrimination-181749>

"Intergroup Relations View On Gay Discrimination", 30 January 2014, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/intergroup-relations-view-on-gay-discrimination-181749

Related Documents

Black Colleges Homosexuality In order to create more egalitarian, prosocial, and productive campus environments, it is necessary to understand attitudes toward homosexuality and homosexual students. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) students experienced relatively high rates of substance abuse, depression, and stress related to discrimination, difficulties forming social relationships, and low self-esteem (Heck, Flentje & Cochran, 2011). As Kirby (2011) points out, "Having a negative self-concept plays a major role in

Each outside label has an affect on that individuals own conception of them, effectively rising or lowering self-image. These categories allow individuals of the same label to sometimes band together in order to further develop their own unique identities away from the labeling and discrimination from the larger group who may view them as abnormal, (Oxoby & McLeish, 2007: 13). Once inside a more specific group, these individuals have

Reduction of Prejudice The Contact Hypothesis of Gordon Allport and the Reduction of Prejudice The literature covering the nature of prejudice, its scope, the effects of prejudice, and methods to reduce on prejudice is among the most extraordinary body of literature in all of social science. The total volume of research on the topic of prejudice is quite extraordinary and this body of work reflects several decades of scholarly investigation of the

Multicultural Education
PAGES 10 WORDS 2683

New York City Multicultural Education Multicultural education Multi-Cultural Education in New York City Aspirations to be an educator, a teacher in the diversity of the New York City Schools must realize that considerations are school-wide focused on setting out and maintaining as well as assessing effective applications in the administering, educating and teaching methods in a multicultural setting. New York City is a place full of diversity and is in fact the home to

Hate Speech Constitutionality of hate-speech laws and legislation College campus hate-speech codes, Fighting words; hate symbols State interest in regulating hate-speech, Arguments for and against such laws and codes, First Amendment protection of unpopular or offensive speech, Sentence enhancement for bias motivated crimes, Supreme Court handling of hate speech and hate crime issues Constitutionality of hate-speech laws and legislation The Constitution of the United States was drafted in 1787, ratified in 1788, and put into operation in 1789. The 10