Internet Sales Tax Term Paper

PAGES
5
WORDS
1352
Cite
Related Topics:

Internet Tax The issue of an Internet sales tax has been at the topic of much debate over the past few years. The issue is a complicated one and the budget crises' facing many states has made it a crucial one. The purpose of this discussion is to examine Internet tax legislation. We will begin by exploring the current status of Texas legislation regarding internet Taxation. We will also investigate the Federal Law regarding Internet taxation. Our research will also discuss the National Governors Association's model legislation to streamline and simplify state taxation. Additionally, we will explore the jurisdiction requirements that allow states to impose sales taxes and the case law that affects states' ability to tax Internet sales.

Texas Legislation

In 1999 Texas legislation proposed that the state would join the streamlined sales tax project. In recent years the legislation has adopted the practices of the streamlined sales tax project.

Texas has currently has one the most stringent Internet tax systems of any state in the union. The state was concerned that it was loosing valuable tax revenue for sales made over the Internet. The Houston Business Journal explains that a merchant in Rhode Island can sell a product over the Internet to an individual residing in Texas but the state will not have the benefit of charging a sales tax because it is unaware of the purchase. This scenario has made lawmakers in Texas and other states criticizing the current federal legislation governing Internet sales tax.

Federal Law

The federal legislation that governs Internet sales tax is known as the Internet tax freedom act. The act, created in 1998, "placed a moratorium on new Internet taxes and on multiple and discriminatory taxes on e-commerce." (Kuster and Untermeyer 2001) The law is extremely controversial and many states complain that the laws that govern the act are too complicated. The Houston Business Journal explains some of these rules, saying,

Online transactions are not exempted from a state's sales tax by the moratorium. If a state chooses to levy a sales tax, that tax is applicable regardless of whether the...

...

The Internet Tax Freedom Act moratorium does, however, prevent states from enacting discriminatory taxes on online sales. That means that a state cannot charge a new tax online that doesn't exist "offline," nor impose a higher tax for online sales than the taxes levied for offline sales." (Kuster and Untermeyer 2001)
Many states believe that the structure of the act is fallible and must be addressed. The unprecedented growth of the Internet has contributed greatly with states discontent about the act. Although the act has experienced great opposition, the moratorium was renewed in 2001 for an additional five years.

Many of the complaints about the act are actually caused by another federal law known as the Dormant Commerce Clause. According to the Yale Journal of Law, "The dormant Commerce Clause is a judge-made doctrine that prohibits states from regulating in ways that unduly burden interstate commerce." (Goldsmith and Sykes 2001) This clause makes it difficult for states to create certain legislation regarding e-commerce because of restrictions related to jurisdictions and interstate commerce which we will discuss later on in the paper.

The National Governors Association's model

Several different states have adopted the use of the streamlined sales tax project. According to a briefing by the joint venture tax policy group,

The Streamlined Sales Tax Project (SSTP) stems from the simplification suggestions made in the minority report of the federal Advisory Commission on E-Commerce (formed by the Internet Tax Freedom Act) and suggestions of the National Governors Association (NGA) in 1999. A group of representatives from over 35 states met throughout 2000 to create a Model Act and Agreement for a uniform and simplified sales and use tax act. The language was approved by the participating states in December 2000. (Nellen 2001)

The briefing goes on to explain the principles of SSTP explaining that the project is designed to simplify the sales and use tax systems. The SSTP includes several rules to make this system possible, some of these…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Goldsmith J.L. - Sykes, A.O. (2001) The Internet and the dormant commerce clause. Yale Law Journal. Volume: 110. Issue: 5. pg 785.

Hardesty, D.

2001) "California's Flawed Case Against Borders Online." E-commerce Tax News. Retrieved July 11, 2003 from, http://www.ecommercetax.com/doc/093001.htm

Kuster, S. And Untermeyer, C. (2001) Internet sales tax legislation could clear state-to-state static. Houston Business Journal. Retrieved July 11, 2003 from, http://www.bizjournals.com/houston/stories/2001/05/21/focus7.html
Nellen, Annette. (2001) The Streamlined Sales Tax Project (SSTP) Proposal - Overview & Analysis 2001. Retrieved July 11, 2003 from, http://www.jointventure.org/initiatives/tax/SSTP2001_1.html


Cite this Document:

"Internet Sales Tax" (2003, July 13) Retrieved April 27, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/internet-sales-tax-151663

"Internet Sales Tax" 13 July 2003. Web.27 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/internet-sales-tax-151663>

"Internet Sales Tax", 13 July 2003, Accessed.27 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/internet-sales-tax-151663

Related Documents

Internet Taxation in the U.S.A. Controversy revolves around the taxation of Internet sales activity and Internet access. The question generating this controversy is: Should the Internet be a tax-free zone in the United States? On the side supporting at least a moratorium on Internet taxation are the some members of the Federal Government and some business people. Opposing a completely tax-free zone are some of the state governors and local government

Michigan law prohibited parties from participating in motor vehicle finance unless they were a either an installment dealer of automobiles or a finance company. Because the finance company was within the scope of businesses who could participate in a retail sales finance contract for automobiles, and it did so in direct cooperation with its affiliated dealers, it was acting as part of a joint venture in the sale of the

Medicare, in addition to covering the elderly, is made available to lower-income individuals, and other direct assistance programs also go to these individuals. Combined with other goods and services such as road maintenance and other infrastructure, national security, etc., which are all consumed essentially evenly (again, in one perspective), this would mean that those at the lowest end of the economic spectrum consume the most and should pay the

U.S. government should not regulate the Internet. One important reason is that it would go against the nations' right to freedom of speech. The government has used a number of reasons to support its quest for regulation, such as protecting children, yet it has ignored the fact that there are other methods to control harmful and illegal material online without hindering the Internet's growth and capabilities. This paper will show

Internet and Global Finance Strategies Within the present competitive business environment, firms are continuously looking for various strategies to be ahead of their competitors and achieve competitive market advantages. Many firms have identified that internet technology is a powerful tool to enhance competitive market advantages. The traditional organizations have identified that internet is a powerful tool to deliver value to customer and presently, the internet technology has enabled firms to coordinate

Since the 1970s, the global retail clothing industry has experienced intense international competition and major shifts in the pattern of consumer demand. These pressures have had far-reaching implications for the clothing industry in the areas of pricing, design, quality, manufacturing processes and employment (Rath, 2002). According to this author, "In the 1970s, traditional manufacturers, particularly High Street retailers with their own manufacturing capacity, found themselves unable to compete with low