John Mearsheimer's "Structural Realism" Is Journal

PAGES
2
WORDS
660
Cite

Aside from distinguishing between classical realists and neorealists, Mearsheimer also distinguishes between other types of realism. He discusses several extensions of structural realism and realists who champion different viewpoints. For instance, the author claims that offensive realists utilize the structure of their states in order to encourage conflict internationally (between states) in order to maximize the amount of power, and the resulting hegemony they can obtain (Mearsheimer 72). Defensive realists largely take the opposite approach, and implement structural regulations and accommodations to circumscribe the amount of power a state obtains, presenting a severe limitation to any international ambitions (Mearsheimer 72). Most contemporary realists, however, choose to focus on individual interests of the state. This notion is in opposition to the stance of classical realists on this issue, which prefer to use the pursuit of justice as one to reinforce notions of community as the principle means by which the state is governed.

Mearsheimer's theory directly correlates to...

...

When the former of these countries was known as the Soviet Union, it attempted to preserve a strong sense of community based on economic principles (capitalism) that directly conflicted with the strong sense of community based on economic principles fostered by the U.S., capitalism, resulting in a security dilemma for both (Mearsheimer 75). Russia's propensity to expand this community throughout the surrounding war can be attributed to the classical realist notion that there is no chief distinction between domestic and international politics. Both countries believed that expanding their sense of community and security involved counteracting that of the other (Mearsheimer 77), which led to the Cold War (which was scalding in certain parts of the world). After the Soviet Union eventually collapsed, it was very interesting how religion, which was widely suppressed during the Communist regime, reasserted itself to restore traditional values to the country.
Works Cited

Dunne, kurki, smith.…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Dunne, kurki, smith. International Relations Theories, 2nd edition ISBN:9780199548866-page 71-88


Cite this Document:

"John Mearsheimer's Structural Realism Is" (2013, March 08) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/john-mearsheimer-structural-realism-is-86541

"John Mearsheimer's Structural Realism Is" 08 March 2013. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/john-mearsheimer-structural-realism-is-86541>

"John Mearsheimer's Structural Realism Is", 08 March 2013, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/john-mearsheimer-structural-realism-is-86541

Related Documents

interventionism from the perspective of realism vs. idealism. Realism is defined in relationship to states' national interests whereas idealism is defined in relation to the UN's Responsibility to Protect doctrine -- a doctrine heavily influenced by Western rhetoric over the past decade. By addressing the question of interventionism from this standpoint, by way of a case study of Libya and Syria, a picture of the realistic implications of "humanitarian

Neo-realists see that states continue struggling for survival as they form international institutions. On the other hand, Neo-liberalists view of international relations as something that shapes and influences the foreign policies of states, therefore further strengthening interconnections between them. Another point is concerned with the power of the military. The point-of-view of Neo-realists on the coercive power of the military is that it is the most important factor in order

The international community, while supporting greater autonomy, opposed the Kosovar Albanians' demand for independence" (History file: Yugoslavia and the Balkans, 2003, BBC News). Yet Milosevic reacted with disproportionate levels of aggression. Structural realism makes no allowance for the level of violence with which Serbia carried out its expansionist program, engaging in efforts of ethnic cleansing. Serbia's efforts make even less rationalistic sense, given the international community's previous hostile reaction to

political framework of EU and OCT European Union (EU) and Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs) are in association with each other via a system which is based on the provisions of part IV of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU), consisting of detailed rules and measures which are laid down in the document issued on 27th November 2001 title Oversees Association Decision. The expiry date of this

Introduction The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was established in 1949 as part of the post-war effort among the nations of the West to work together to establish the peace. Throughout the Cold War, NATO was more of a symbol than an actual military alliance. It was not until the Cold War ended that the first joint military NATO operations were conducted. The first was in 1990 and the second in

S.-USSR confrontation ended, the future of the alliance would lie in its role to strike a balance between the new poles of power that would emerge in the coming decades. Due to the lack of vision concerning the future evolution of the international system, there was little agreement on how to actually proceed in reestablishing and redefining the role and scope of NATO. This is why some scholars considered that the