Prater was told to bring the truck home over the weekend to work on the body only. His boss never gave him permission to use the truck for any other purpose. Besides, the insurance on the truck would probably only pay for the accident if it occurred on company time. Prater could be charged for stealing the truck and unauthorized use. The ruling in this case should be for the plaintiff. Prater should have to pay for the accident and repairs to the truck. Week 8

5. In this case, the city is still the rightful owner of the piece of restored artwork. It does not matter how long Hoeltzer had the artwork, it is still the property of the city. Therefore, the city has legal title to the artwork unless they actually signed it over to Hoelzer's possession.

6. The Kapiloff's are still the original owner of the stamps. Although they were purchased in an antique store by another person, chances are the Kapiloff's have some sort of documents for the stamps that declares them the owner. Granter's original idea was to purchase the dresser, and not the stamps....

So, Granter is the owner of the dresser, but the Kapiloff are still the owners of the stamps.
8. No, this ordinance does not constitute a taking of the hotel's property by the district. As long as the taxi cab stand is on the hotel property, the hotel can determine how the stand is operated and they would have final decision making options about the stand. The hotel can choose to lease out their property, but whoever leases the property must abide by hotel rules and regulations.

11. In this situation, the Molendas are the actual owners of the strip of land. The city has a land plan that is already surveyed and mapped. The city keeps information about land surveys and mapping on file, so if the records state that the Molendas are the actual owners of the strip of land, then the Kloss' do not have right to take ownership of the land. All land is listed on a deed, so if the Kloss' purchased the land from the Molendas, there should a deed stating that the Kloss' are the owners. However, there is no such deed, so this strip of land belongs to the Molendas.