Leadership And Management Differences In Essay

The paradigm that Kotter proposed in his article gives management the ability to act on these factors and bring greater levels of performance to an organization in the short-run. Contrasting the management role in an organization, leadership is more focused on creating a vision that can sustain and unify a business over the long-term. Leadership is also more focused on how an organization is going to deal with change from a strategic standpoint, redefining its business model if necessary in the process (Kotter, 2001). According to Kotter, leader also looks to make interconnections between different elements as well, creating new opportunities in the process (Kotter, 2001). He also describes the various leadership styles and approaches including the emergence of transformational leaders, who have the ability to defining a compelling vision...

...

Kotter's article on leadership shows this to be the case and provides a series of frameworks and concepts for underscoring the role of managers vs. leaders in organizations. The manager's role of stabilizing an organization and the leader's ability to define a vision that are achievable and unify an organization are critical for the overall growth and stability of a business.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Millissa F.Y. Cheung, & Chi-Sum Wong. (2011). Transformational leadership, leader support, and employee creativity. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32(7), 656-672.

Kotter, J. (2001, What leaders really do. Harvard Business Review, 79(11), 85-96.


Cite this Document:

"Leadership And Management Differences In" (2013, March 10) Retrieved May 14, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/leadership-and-management-differences-in-86575

"Leadership And Management Differences In" 10 March 2013. Web.14 May. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/leadership-and-management-differences-in-86575>

"Leadership And Management Differences In", 10 March 2013, Accessed.14 May. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/leadership-and-management-differences-in-86575

Related Documents

Indeed, without these legitimacy criteria, a leader would not be able to influence followers to either change or progress towards organizational goals: "The acceptance of leadership from another person involves an implicit contract in which followers sacrifice some level of personal autonomy and pledge loyalty and effort to the leader.... The followers must be sure that the leader has the competency to lead effectively and the trustworthiness and loyalty

Leadership Management Effective Approaches Leadership Management Different personalities practice different management styles, while different management styles are suited to different personalities. It is very important for a manager to make sure that their employees are motivated and their work rates are up to the mark. The employees of any organization need to be motivated in order to maintain a fair attendance at the office along with enough motivation that employees would

leadership capability relation accepted model leadership management. Part 1. 'Situational leadership redundant a task .' As a future leader teams, present arguments statement. Situational leadership The internal environment within economic agents is suffering dramatic changes within the modern day society and this is the result of numerous pressures from the internal and external environments, such as technology, competition or increasing demands from the various categories of stakeholders. In such a setting,

Cross Cultural Leadership Cultural Differences in Leadership Cultural differences determine certain leadership traits and portions of our personality. It is easy to discredit the importance of cross-cultural differences and their influences on various leadership styles. Different cultures are known for certain traits. For instance, the Australian culture is known for it egalitarianism. Chinese culture is known as an authority oriented culture (Sharpe, 2007). These differences in culture result in the development of

In that regard, a leader who gets things done through coercion as opposed to consensus could be regarded a successful but not an effective leader. Looked at from another perspective, successful leadership differs from effective leadership on the basis of emphasis. While emphasis in successful leadership is on power and position, the emphasis when it comes to effective leadership is often on the personal attributes of a leader. It

Leadership is the process of directing the behavior of others toward the achievement of some general objectives. Effective leadership is very important for molding a group of people into a team, shaping them into a force that serves as a sustainable business benefit. Effective leaders have an inspirational vision. Forethought and change expectation is their hallmark. Leaders know how to make people function in a joint fashion, and how to