Leadership Assessment and How to Function in IT1

Leadership Assessment After taking this assessment for leadership abilities a lot of people will speculate what will the position turn out to be. The rationale behind the assessment is to collect definite issues or questions that possibly will relate to the place of work. These specific questions included numerous teamwork and decision making features. The key goal is to figure out which mode of group leadership the individual is supposed to be.

From the definite groups that were made when taken the assessment it turned out that my highest score was the authoritarian style. It was clear that some of the details for an authoritarian are making choices very quick, guiding, and a control freak. In general, being categorized as authoritarian did not surprise me at all. My earlier role as a business advisor was one good example of this. The chief objective for the business was not only driving sales, nevertheless to lead your company team in recognizing the brands.

This was able to provide gave me the optimistic attitude in order to work in the direction of goals and methods to converse to accomplish them. This successful communication of putting together e- learnings and PowerPoint presentations for the workers helped them to understand the importance of making a profit. Being able to obtain control of the problem as an authoritarian leader, provided the business more accomplishment that it required.

The collaboration at times was not showing the necessary creativity with time restraints, however they were able to construct a perfect sales team that turned out to be effective. It was important to make sure that the team was on the same page and that they understood exactly what was needed of them. Because I wanted the company to be successful, I had to make a decision that involved me handing out incentives for employees. Some of these ideas included things such awarding free movie tickets.

Other awards were handing out gift cards and giving them free gas on Friday's by filling up their gas tanks personally. The selection of being a brand consultant leader was not the easiest at first. With particular projects that needed to be finished, making sure that the team was prepared to go an extra mile was the hardest. This had to be done with effective communication. In my workplace, verbal communication was the most understandable form of communication.

Nonetheless, research has revealed individuals pay much less attention to the words that are understood and much more consideration to the actions and nonverbal signals that attend to those words. Nonverbal signals comprise of facial expressions. (Bennis, 2005) With my employees, I would use a lot of hand motions, body pose and movements of my eyes. As a leader, I understand that it is important to strive to always match my nonverbal cues to my words; when I do this, I noticed that I am much authentic and reliable.

Listening to my employees would be number one on the list. An important feature of communication is the capability to listen to your workers. Having the right kind of active listening needs to always be a goal. As an authoritarian leader focusing on both the verbal and nonverbal language of the speaker has always been important (Bennis, 2005). I understand that active listening includes concentrating merely on the speaker and disregarding outside disruptions. These interruptions involve the listener's own drifting thoughts or possible replies.

Active listeners likewise stay away from intruding, and give the speaker time to finish. This shows I am listening to them by doing things such as nodding my head or smiling, and reflect back to confirm their understanding. As an Authoritarian leader I rarely let the members of my group make decisions, for the reason that I believe that his expertise and experience makes me the most qualified (Leadership Styles, 2007). When it comes to recognizing opportunity, this is one of my weaknesses.

This is because I fail to recognize the skills and abilities inside other persons. In my workplace, I am guilty of depriving the opportunities of them to use or exhibit their skills in decision-making sites. In order to change this, I would allow the employees to be able to heard. This is important because they need to feel valid. In order for a business to grow, employees have to learn to be free-thinkers.

As an authoritarian leader, it was easy to stump the growth of the worker when they were not allowed to express themselves (Leadership Styles, 2007). There are a lot of talented and skilled employees that have yet to shine because of not being able to add their input. I would honor their opinions and recognize that they are important, in order to grow the business. There were times when the employees felt intimidated because I did not allow them to express their opinions.

When it comes to the role as advisor, authoritarian leadership is most appropriate in situations in which employees are brand new and new in their occupations. I understood as a leader that I got results best with groups that were larger. As an advisor, I would need to learn how to motivate my staff. Giving them positive feedback is very important if I want my employees to continue to do good work for the business.

When it comes to recognizing talent, I would look for those that go the extra mile. This would mean taking the time to evaluate my employees more closely. I understand that talents are not always acknowledged and one of the explanations for that is for the reason that they can be easily masked by unevenness. It would be my duty to make sure that everyone is in their right area where they are able display their.