Transformative And Authentic Leadership: What Is The Difference  Term Paper

Leadership Practices by Lieutenant Colonel Jeffrey G. Smith, U.S. Army While the debate over nature vs. nurture continues, some people appear to be naturally born to assume leadership positions while others must constantly struggle to become and remain effective leaders. Moreover, some types of leadership have been shown to be more effective in certain circumstances than others, with transformative leadership being needed in some situations while authentic leadership is required in others. To determine the facts, this paper provides an overview of transformative and authentic leadership and a discussion concerning the relationship between them. The identification and description of a current successful leader, Lieutenant Colonel Jeffrey G. Smith, U.S. Army, and the rationale in support of his selection is followed by the results of a telephonic interview with this leader. Finally, a summary of the research and a discussion concerning how the results of the personal interview with Colonel Smith will be implemented in the author's personal leadership practices are provided in the conclusion.

Overview of the concepts and practices in the reading and the relationship between them

By definition, transformative leadership "transforms" people and organizations in meaningful ways. In this regard, Northouse (2013) reports that, "Transformational leadership involves an exceptional form of influence that moves followers to accomplish more than is usually expected of them. It is a process that often incorporates charismatic and visionary leadership" (p. 57). Because charisma and vision are regarded as important elements of transformative leadership, it is clear that there is a certain "nature" element involved in this leadership style and it is reasonable to suggest that some people are born with these types of attributes.

By very sharp contrast, some authorities argue that authentic leadership is also an effective approach to leadership that can be learned. For instance, Northouse (2013) also notes that, "Authentic leadership is something that can be nurtured in a leader, rather than as a fixed trait. Authentic leadership develops in people over a lifetime and can be triggered by major life events such as a severe illness or a new career"...

...

254). This observation is highly congruent with the guidance provided by Avolio (2005) that, "Authentic leadership development takes into account that life and trigger events shape leadership development" (p. 194). Although both transformative and authentic leadership involve close interactions with followers in ways that can affect leaders and followers, the fundamental difference between transformative leadership and authentic leadership concerns the source of leadership attributes, with the former being innate and the latter being acquired over time (Northouse, 2013). One military leader who has acquired his leadership skills over time is Lieutenant Colonel Jeffrey G. Smith, deputy chief of staff at Fort Sill, Oklahoma who is discussed further below.
Identification and description of a successful leader

Today, Lieutenant Colonel Jeffrey G. Smith is the 44-year-old deputy chief of staff for Fort Sill, Oklahoma. In 1993, Jeffrey G. Smith graduated from Southern Nazarene University in Tulsa, Oklahoma with a master's degree in organizational leadership. The selection of Lieutenant Colonel Smith was based on his demonstrated track record of successful leadership in the U.S. Army as described further below.

Rationale in support of leader election

Following his graduation from Southern Nazarene University, Smith was commissioned a second lieutenant in the U.S. Army inn the Adjutant General Corps and was assigned to a training station at Fort Dix, New Jersey where he spent 3 years and was promoted to first lieutenant. In 1997, Lieutenant Smith was transferred to the 2nd Infantry Division in South Korea where he spent 13 months as executive officer for an artillery brigade and received a promotion to captain. His next assignment from 1999 to 2002 was as a battalion adjutant general at the 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) at Fort Campbell, Kentucky where Smith was promoted to a field officer-level as a major. In late 2002, Major Smith took part in Operation Enduring Freedom in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, serving first as a brigade adjutant general and then as a division adjutant general when he was promoted to lieutenant colonel upon his return to the United States where he was assigned as a deputy…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Avolio, B. J (2005). Leadership development in balance: Made/born. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence

Erlbaum Associates.

Northouse, P.G. (2013). Leadership: Theory and practice (6th ed.). New York: Sage

Publications, Inc.


Cite this Document:

"Transformative And Authentic Leadership What Is The Difference " (2014, December 28) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/transformative-and-authentic-leadership-2153911

"Transformative And Authentic Leadership What Is The Difference " 28 December 2014. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/transformative-and-authentic-leadership-2153911>

"Transformative And Authentic Leadership What Is The Difference ", 28 December 2014, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/transformative-and-authentic-leadership-2153911

Related Documents

Leadership Styles: How to Become an Effective Leader Power Perspective and Leader as Representatives Extrovert and Introvert Emotional Intelligence (EI) Competencies to Leadership Effectiveness Task-Oriented Leadership Satisfaction and Performance Four Dimensions of Leader-Member Exchange Authentic leadership and Servant Leadership Creating Social and Organizational Identity Goal Orientations Transformational Leaders Enhancing the Goal-Setting Process Leadership Styles As the workplace turns out to be increasingly complex and multicultural, the cry for effective leadership has been answered by a growing popularity of leadership studies in various

Leadership StylesIntroductionLeadership is a crucial aspect of both policing and law enforcement administration. Current research in leadership styles includes, but is not limited to, situational, transformational and autocratic (traditional) styles. Differences in the contexts of action can affect which style works best at any given time. Ultimately, it is important to identify the needs of any given situation, the skills and qualities of the individual leader, and decide on the

Ethics in Public Leadership
PAGES 10 WORDS 2939

Ethics in Public LeadershipIntroductionEthical leadership is an essential component of effective leadership in any organization, whether it be a public or private entity. It is essential for leaders to model ethical behavior, establish ethical standards, and hold themselves and others accountable for ethical behavior. Wart's (2011) five ethics models provide a framework for understanding different approaches to ethical leadership. Additionally, the concept of spiritual-servant leadership emphasizes the importance of serving

The most successful training programs are concentrating on the cognitive side of emotions, specifically evaluating how leaders can provide individualized attention and support to help subordinates prioritize tasks, focus their efforts, organize their time and resources and attain a higher level of performance. The transition of managers into leaders is also determined by the level of trust the latter is able to create and sustain through greater authenticity and

likeability is effected by management in the international workplace. It assumes a phenomenological approach to the notion of likeability, and is based on the idea that likeability in management is fundamental to achieving "connectedness" among employees and to inspiring the drive needed to ensure an organization's success. By conducting a survey of employees and managers from every major business continent of the globe (Asia, Europe, America, the Middle East),

Abdelsayed, L. M., Bustrum, J. M., Tisdale, T. C., Reimer, K. S., & Camp, C. A. (2013). The impact of personality on God image, religious coping, and religious motivation among Coptic Orthodox priests. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 16(2), 155-172. doi:10.1080/13674676.2011.652604 The authors of this article show how intrinsic motivation is linked to personality characteristics among priests in the Coptic Orthodox tradition. Using a sample of 75 Orthodox priests, all of