Lean Principles For Process Delivery Term Paper

Length: 20 pages Sources: 15 Subject: Business - Management Type: Term Paper Paper: #39992984 Related Topics: Aerospace Engineering, Automotive Industry, Casual, Johnson And Johnson
Excerpt from Term Paper :

" In those manufacturers who are attaining lean enterprise-level performance, the cultures of their companies have become incredibly focused on metrics, and in fact the organizations themselves have become so metrically driven that the culture itself embraces the concept of measuring performance and improvement (Nash, Poling 2007).

Lean positioned for cost cutting vs. customer-driven change. This is also a critical mistake many manufacturers make, and often becomes the main focus these companies continue to pursue, as opportunities to better integrate their strategies with customers, suppliers, buyers, and service organizations present themselves.

Evolution of the Lean Enterprise

Manufacturers have continually struggled to gain the advantages of lean manufacturing, starting first with manufacturing processes at the shop floor level and progressing to a vision of implementing an entire lean enterprise. What's become essential in the pursuit of the lean enterprise are the creation of strategies for driving waste of all types (time, logistics, costs) out of the enterprise. Table 1, Characteristics of a Lean Production System, show the specific lean production processes and accompanying system change initiatives, an analysis based on the research completed by the MIT Lean Aerospace Initiative, which has applicability to the auto industry as well.

Characteristics of a Lean Production System,

Lean Production Process

System Change Initiative

Focus

Production line (tasks, activities, and cells)

Single organization (departments, processes, suppliers, and customers)

Practices

Cellular manufacturing, quality circles, supplier relationship management, pull production, reengineering setups.

TQM, JIT, Six Sigma and, process reengineering

Performance

Measurement

Systems

Takt time, on time delivery, first time through safety performance production rate

Visibility - real-time reporting and the use of analytics to track the entire value chains' performance

Casual relationships (production tasks and activities)

Use of single version of the truth and single information reporting

Quality, delivery, process time, cost, flexibility, customer satisfaction

Balanced set of strategic metrics (financial and non-financial)

New methods of cost accounting (ABC, target costing) down communication

Internal vs. external focus (benchmarking and self-assessment)

Process management and measures (value delivery)

Source: (Bennett 2003)

Table 2, Comparing Lean Production and Lean Enterprise Characteristics, illustrates the many differences in focus, practices, metrics, and performance measurement systems. The shift required in manufacturing companies to achieve this level of performance needs to start with the recommendations at the end and continually build upon insights gained from the survey contained within this paper.

Comparing Lean Production and Lean Enterprise Characteristics,

Lean Production Process

System Change Initiative

The Lean Enterprise

Focus

Production line (tasks, activities, and cells)

Single organization (departments, processes, suppliers, and customers)

Extended enterprise (value streams and all stakeholders)

Practices

Cellular manufacturing, quality circles, supplier relationship management, pull production, reengineering setups

TQM, JIT, Six Sigma and, process reengineering

Seamless information flow, integrated product and process development, process capability and maturation, identify and optimize enterprise flow, maintain stability in changing environment, align and involve all stakeholders to achieve lean vision, relationship based on mutual trust and commitment across the extended enterprise, make decisions at the lowest levels, optimize capability and utilization of people, focus on external and internal environment, nurture a learning environment

Metrics

Takt time, on time delivery, first time through, safety performance, production rate

Quality, delivery, process time, cost, flexibility, customer satisfaction

Stakeholder value (effectiveness), overall efficiency, system availability, system level flexibility

Performance

Measurement System

Visibility - real-time reporting

Casual relationships (production tasks and activities)

Use of single version of the truth and single information

Balanced set of strategic metrics (financial and nonfinancial)

New methods of cost accounting (ABC, target costing)

-down communication

Process management and measures (value delivery)

Stakeholder value measures

Uniform set of measures

Casual relationships between measures across all levels

Source: (Bennett 2003)

Framework for Evaluating Lean Process Maturity

Based on the collective work completed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Center for Transportation and Logistics relating to manufacturers and the theoretical frameworks developed by the MIT Lean Aerospace Initiative the following benchmarking framework has been created. The 18 life-cycle lean processes (Bennett 2003) measured in this benchmarking instrument include the following:

Business Acquisition and Program Management

Leverage lean capability for business growth

Optimize the capability and utilization of assets

Provide capability to manage risk, cost, schedule, and performance

Resource and empower program development...

...

It is not enough to simply look at a binary, either/or condition for each factor. It is rather the level of maturity on each of these 18 attributes that determines an organizations' potential for attaining best practices as a lean enterprise. Using a four-point scale applied to each of these factors yields a self-scoring questionnaire which is shown in the following table. Giving just one answer for each of the 18 factors, calculate a given process's lean enterprise performance with an organization of interest. The development of aggregate scores by each specific area will define the level of process maturity as defined by their lean characteristics.

After having scored an organization and its processes on its lean initiatives, use the following table to define where an organization is on the Lean Enterprise Maturity Model:

Score

Level in the Lean Enterprise Maturity Model

Orchestrating - Where an organization has a very high level of cross-department and division collaboration and often has a corporate-wide edict that forces lean enterprise principles deep into the organization.

Collaborating - a series of process -- and it-based infrastructures exist to ensure cross-department and cross-divisional collaboration.

Anticipating level - Marked with in-division collaboration only.

Isolated approach to lean - Heavily influenced by silos

The following graphical representation of the Lean Enterprise Maturity Model illustrates how each level of maturity varies by Process Maturity and Information Maturity. This graphical concept of a maturity model was originally proposed by AMR Research in the definition of Demand Driven Supply Networks (DDSN) maturity levels, and has direct applicability to lean enterprises' levels of lean manufacturing maturity. Both process and information maturity is measured, progressing from being purely reactive from a process standpoint through creating processes through anticipating departmental requirements, through collaborating to orchestrating processes to attain level process best practices.

Recommendations for driving Lean Process Transformation

In the studies referenced implementing lean manufacturing strategies for automotive refurbishment suppliers the following key recommendations emerge:

Greater system-level integration with downstream stakeholder values and greater visibility into customer demands. Relating back to the discussion at the beginning of this paper how the highest performing manufacturers are able to eliminate several types of waste while concentrating on delivering exceptional value to their customers is a key success factor in attaining lean manufacturing strategies. Using the 18 attribute lean manufacturing framework to evaluate an organization can serve as the catalyst for further diagnosing of processes' areas of strengths and weaknesses.

Delivering greater process standardization and greater cross-functional communication eliminates wasted time, duplicated processes, and lost opportunities to better serve customers. In several of the case studies that MIT and others have cited as examples of best practices in lean enterprises, the senior management teams worked to tear down the silos between departments by actively encouraging and rewarding cross-department and cross-division collaboration. The greater the level of integration between functions and processes, the greater the reduction of waste in over-processing, waiting, transport, processing, inventory carrying costs, in addition to defects & spoilage (Monroe 2006).

Integrate and reward lean initiatives success and include them in both strategic planning and production systems planning. The automotive manufacturers and automotive refurbishment companies gaining the greatest competitive advantage through their efforts to become lean enterprises have started first with smaller projects and then progressed to enterprise-wide ones once the payoff has become clear.

Integration of environmental protection, compliance, health and safety systems corporate wide. Clearly the need for mitigating the significant costs of compliance as they relate to the use and disposal of chemicals and raw materials used in the production of complex products are many manufacturers' most critical concern, and this area of automotive manufacturing is gaining in importance as governance, risk and compliance (GRC) continues to gain in prominence as a strategic initiative within organizations. The development of lean initiatives that include GRC components have increasingly been developed as a result of global compliance requirements as well. The…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Aberdeen Group (2005). Best Practices in Strategic Service Management. Aberdeen Group Report. June, 2005. Boston, MA. Executive Summary. Retrieved January 26, 2008.

Aberdeen Group (2006). Best Practices in International Logistics. Aberdeen Group Research Report, January, 2006. Boston, MA.

Retrieved January 31, 2008

Adamides, N Karacapilidis, H Pylarinou, D Koumanakos. (2008). Supporting collaboration in the development and management of lean supply networks. Production Planning & Control, 19(1), 35. Retrieved January 31, 2008, from ABI/INFORM Global database. (Document ID: 1423331461).


Cite this Document:

"Lean Principles For Process Delivery" (2008, February 09) Retrieved October 21, 2021, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/lean-principles-for-process-delivery-32362

"Lean Principles For Process Delivery" 09 February 2008. Web.21 October. 2021. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/lean-principles-for-process-delivery-32362>

"Lean Principles For Process Delivery", 09 February 2008, Accessed.21 October. 2021,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/lean-principles-for-process-delivery-32362

Related Documents
Lean Principles to Service Processes: Lean Principles
Words: 752 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Healthcare Paper #: 83610910

Lean Principles to Service Processes: Lean principles have been in existence for hundred years though global interest was fueled by the success of Toyota Company that developed Toyota Production System. The focus of operations based on lean principles is removing waste and lessening lead times that exist between customer demand and fulfillment. These principles are necessary in improving the speed, accuracy, and quality of customer service through continuous identification and

Lean Manufacturing Follows a Principle
Words: 1588 Length: 4 Pages Topic: Business - Management Paper #: 56101858

Though there are an increasing number of manufacturers who are successful in implementing lean principles to the factory floor, using them to the rest of the organization has a long way to go. (Moving lean beyond the factory floor) To conclude, History has established that Lean Manufacturing is here to settle. The query is, "Will your company adopt Lean Manufacturing and make it an enduring company strategy and eventually a

Lean Production Is an Innovative Production Technique
Words: 3110 Length: 10 Pages Topic: Economics Paper #: 47556075

Lean Production is an innovative production technique of Japanese origin that aims at bring efficiency in production. The system comprises of various different techniques, all focusing on ensuring best quality and maximum levels outputs in minimum inputs. Minimum inputs here, not only refer to minimum in terms of materials, but also in terms of time and cost thus ensuring minimum wastage (Stevensons, 2008). Methods that are part of Lean Production

Health Care -- Lean Philosophy on Cost
Words: 3801 Length: 15 Pages Topic: Business - Management Paper #: 20327811

Health Care -- Lean Philosophy on Cost Reduction and Quality Improvement Lean Philosophy is initially traced back to Henry Ford's innovative assembly line, revolutionizing manufacturing while failing to provide true variety. Building on Ford's concepts Toyota management established a Lean Philosophy in the 1930's and 1940's that focused on production flow and waste elimination, resulting in rapid, low cost and high quality processes, along with simpler and more accurate management. These

Generic Application and Effectiveness of Lean Six Sigma Practices...
Words: 5903 Length: 20 Pages Topic: Business - Management Paper #: 84506557

Quality Management System and Continuous Improvement Six Sigma Strategy for Continuous Improvement Implementing Six Sigma Lean Strategy for Continuous Improvement Lean and Sig Sigma Interrelated Industrial application of lean / six sigma Lean / Six Sigma in Service Industry Lean / Six Sigma in Manufacturing Industry Lean / Six Sigma in Construction Industry Lean / Six Sigma in Mining Industry Effectiveness of the Lean / Six Sigma in the Industry Population and Sampling In the business management strategy, quality plays a major

Process Improvement Tools and Applications in Quality Management
Words: 2616 Length: 10 Pages Topic: Business Paper #: 52625919

FedEx Quality Management Issue Process Improvement Tools and Applications in Quality Management FED-EX Case Study For the purpose of the present study, the company chosen is that of Fed-Ex. This writer will take on the role of a quality management consultant and submit a recommended direction to implement a quality management initiative to address the quality management related problems identified. An examination of the Fed-Ex company informs this study that Fed-Ex has issues