Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … littered with grammatical and stylistic errors, which makes it difficult to read.
The following sentence is one example of the poor grammar used throughout the paper. "Our society has a responsibility to educate our youth not to use drugs, provide help for addicts trying to quit, workplace drug testing, and we need to disrupt the market for illicit drugs." Up to the phrase "trying to quit" the sentence is fine. The author should just divide this sentence into two parts or create better parallel phrasing such as: "...trying to quit, and mandate workplace drug testing." Then a separate sentence should contain the phrase "We also need to disrupt the market for illicit drugs."
The paper is actually well-organized. Throughout the first section the author offers the history and reasoning behind workplace drug testing, and also refutes common objections to the practice. Next the author discusses the benefits of testing, including workplace safety and overall drug use reduction. However, the introduction needs some work, as it is choppy, sloppy, and does not adequately engage the reader.
4. The paper is very well presented but simply needs grammar and stylistic corrections. The author obviously has a good grasp of the topic and organized his or her ideas. By cleaning up bad grammar in phrases like "they are a minimum of opinions," this could be a good paper. The use of first person is fine, but the author might have improved that by including anecdotes instead of just making flat statements like "These are also done on near misses sometimes. I have seen both done where I work."
5. The paper is definitely a persuasive essay, and makes a clear argument for workplace drug testing. One of its key strengths is the author's ability to anticipate audience objections and refute those with evidence. Even though readers may not agree with the "war on drugs" launched by Nancy Reagan, the central argument is tenable.
Workplace Privacy Issue: For a long period of time, the right to privacy, including workplace privacy has been a major controversial issue. In the recent past, workplace privacy issues have become major focal point of debates regarding the rights of employers and employees because of the impact of technological advancements, legislative scrutiny, and rising costs of healthcare. Generally, workplace privacy issues are divided into two major categories i.e. on-the-job and off-the-job
Deontologically, people might take a stand for personal physical privacy as an innate moral good; yet, precisely what each deontologist might define privacy to be may vary. Consequently, some deontologists might think that workplace surveillance and drug tests are morally acceptable, while genetic tests are not. Others might organize their beliefs differently -- all measures may be seen as morally unacceptable, for instance. Essentially, attesting to be either a
This even happened in Athens in 1993 when its municipal government imposed conditions of a cholesterol check. They sought to accept only those employees having acceptable level of cholesterol. Employers later had to abandon this policy due to public hue and cry but it shows how far employers can go in imposing medical conditions on employees. Drug testing is a common practice in a number of organizations as its harmful
Privacy of an Individual in the Workplace Argument Length: 2,000 words Task Construct argument notion individual's privacy important consideration workplace, Use ethical theory support position. Rationale This task designed: demonstrate capacity understand evaluate privacy; demonstrate understanding issues encroach individual's privacy workplace; demonstrate ability construct a compelling argument logically consistent supported ethical theory; Privacy of an individual in the workplace In the workplace, it is expected that employees must relinquish some of their most
They are also required to assess and address risks to customer information in all areas of operations, including employee management and training, information systems, and detecting and managing system failures. They must address what information is collected and stored as well as whether there is a business need for that particular information. Depending on the type of business operations, privacy laws govern how companies collect, store, and use customer identifiable
Workplace Monitoring As technology advances, employers worldwide are faced with the problem of employee's ill usage of the communication media. In order to reduce these risks, employers are now turning towards technology monitoring, which would enable them to keep a strict watch over their employees. A lot of issues have risen, as a result of workplace monitoring and the debate whether this act of the employers is ethically correct or not