Local, State And Federal Partnership: Terrorism National Essay

Local, State and Federal Partnership: Terrorism National Response Framework (NRF)

National Response Framework is a document that guides and presents an integrated national rejoinder to emergencies and disasters stipulating how all hazardous responses are conducted by nations (Alperen 2011). It deals with the large catastrophes and the smaller incidences. A comprehensive approach is established to respond to domestic incidences with the framework spelling out key responses that are principle, as well as the structures and roles that organize national response. Clear description on how States, private sector, Federal Government, nongovernmental organizations or partners and communities use these principles for an effective and coordinated national response are included. Moreover, the NRF shows specific circumstances whereby the Federal Government exercises a larger role involving federal interests and catastrophes where significant support is required by the state. Therefore, the NRF provides mechanism and structure for the National-level policies in regards to incidents management (www.fema.gov/NRF).

...

The document includes Public Information, Multiagency Coordination systems and Incident Command System (Alperen 2011). In addition, NIMS provides a proactive approach that is systematic to guide agencies and departments at all levels of Private, governmental and nongovernmental sectors to respond to, prevent, recover from, protect against and mitigate incidences effects regardless of size, complexity, location, or cause with an aim of reducing loss of life, harm of environment and property. NIMS therefore provide guidelines for incident management.
Joint Command Center (JOC)

This is an intelligent center for control and command, which manages multiagency preparation for investigative response and law enforcement with the aim of accrediting terrorism threat.JOC, can be established to organize multiple agencies, jurisdiction and coordination in critical incidences. It has the power to command groups including…

Cite this Document:

"Local State And Federal Partnership Terrorism National" (2012, May 28) Retrieved April 18, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/local-state-and-federal-partnership-terrorism-80265

"Local State And Federal Partnership Terrorism National" 28 May 2012. Web.18 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/local-state-and-federal-partnership-terrorism-80265>

"Local State And Federal Partnership Terrorism National", 28 May 2012, Accessed.18 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/local-state-and-federal-partnership-terrorism-80265

Related Documents

Norfolk Virginia is a medium sized city, and like many other local communities, has had to adapt to the new reality that the events of September 11, 2001 have forced the nation to accept. In the wake of the attacks a federal Commission was charged with exploring the causes, events, and lessons to be learned from the tragedy. This commission recommended a dual path approach to keeping the nation safe:

Law Enforcement Differences Between Various Levels Of Law Enforcement Federal prisons are for conviction under Federal laws. State prisons are similar in all concepts and applications but are for convictions under state statutes (Albanese, 2002). Privatized prisons are owned by the state in which they are in and have been tried (or are being used) by several states on the assumption that a privately operated prison will cost less money over

Local, State, Federal Partnerships Local, State, and Federal Partnerships Q1.Explain the chain-of-command structure when receiving information about a possible act of terrorism in your city. The incident is confirmed to be the work of terrorists. Now what? The mayor (or city or county manager) is charged with providing strategic guidance and coordinating resources during an emergency. As part of the mayor's responsibility for the public's safety, he or she is charged with coordinating

Law Enforcement Partnerships: Terrorism The tragic events of 9/11, which left thousands of people dead and hundreds more seriously injured, brought to light the high degree of disorganization in the nation's counterterrorism plan, and the ill-preparedness of our security forces in responding to large-scale disasters. All the same, the attack brought a new dimension to the sphere of American policing. Federal agencies are increasingly appreciating the immense role of local police

S.A. PATRIOT Act Improvement and Reauthorization Act reauthorized all expiring provisions of the U.S.A. PATRIOT Act, added dozens of additional safeguards to protect privacy interests and civil liberties, and strengthened port security. (USDOJ, 2008) SUMMARY & CONCLUSION This report has presented in brief the federal policy changes that been changed or created since the events of September 11, 2001. Changes have included collaboration between federal, state and local agencies in coordination and

These are designed to be confusing for terrorists who attempt to circumvent them. The unpredictability is enhanced by varying them for location to location. What makes the threat especially insidious is the fact that current full body scanners used in airports across the world cannot detect items concealed inside the body with great accuracy. However, improving existing technology can change this capability for the better, according to aviation security