Law Enforcement Partnerships: Terrorism
The tragic events of 9/11, which left thousands of people dead and hundreds more seriously injured, brought to light the high degree of disorganization in the nation's counterterrorism plan, and the ill-preparedness of our security forces in responding to large-scale disasters. All the same, the attack brought a new dimension to the sphere of American policing. Federal agencies are increasingly appreciating the immense role of local police in terrorism prevention and response. Experience has shown that terrorism does not always have to be a large-scale attack as that witnessed on 9/11; sometimes what appears to be a bomb threat, a local homicide situation, or a gas explosion may actually be instigated by domestic terrorists, and as it turns out, the first responders in such low-magnitude incidents are most assuredly rescue and fire personnel and local police. Whereas the role of the former in both terrorist and regular crime incidents is quite clear, most people still do not quite know how a local law enforcer ought to handle a case of suspected terrorism and whether or not their handling of the same is similar to that of regular cases of crime. This text seeks to outline what the roles of various security agents are in the San Francisco terrorism-response system.
i) The role of the Local Law Enforcer
Like is the case in any other regular criminal case, the local law enforcer has two major roles to play in incidents suspected to have been instigated by terrorists -- collecting and preserving valuable information from the incident scene and managing the crime scene to ensure that i) the safety and government (Newman & Clarke, 2008). During this period, they are supposed to treat the scene as a regular crime scene; and their primary and immediate concern is to deal with the death and destruction witnessed at the scene (Newman & Clarke, 2008).
Collecting Relevant Information from the Scene of the Attack: It is not the local officer's role to pursue the perpetrators of the crime (Newman & Clarke, 2008). This is normally left to the FBI. Being the first persons at the scene of the attack, however, local officers stand better chances of obtaining relevant pieces of valuable information that would perhaps have been corrupted by the time federal and state agents arrive (Newman & Clarke, 2008). The officers should systematically collect information on, among other things, the state of victims, the estimated magnitude of the attack, the type of material and gadgets used in the attack, the possible extent of damage, and the estimated number of casualties. The victims as well as other people present at the scene prior to and during the attack can be a valuable source of such information. This information will often provide a valuable starting point for investigations by federal and state agencies (Newman & Clarke, 2008). In their 2008 report to the executive on the state of the country's response-to-terrorism system, Newman and Clarke reported that the failure by local law enforcers to collect relevant information within the first hour of the 9/11 attack resulted in rescuers giving faulty evacuation instructions to occupants of the World Trade Center, perhaps resulting in more casualties than would otherwise have been witnessed.
Managing the Scene: the local officer needs to take full control of the scene, and as much as he will be out to "mitigate the harm done to victims at the site," he should…
Providing fast and open communication is a crucial component of law enforcement's role in any emergency situation, particular natural disasters in which the circumstances of the danger can change rapidly and seemingly without warning. In fact, most emergency management situations will require fast responses from law enforcement personnel and agencies. A HAZMAT situation is one such example, in which it is crucial that individual members of the law enforcement agency
Terrorism Memo to the Department of Homeland Security: There are federal statutes on the books that can help address the way that terrorists finance their draconian operations. This document delves into the specifics of how financing can be cut off or at least addressed to some extent, enough to bottle up terrorist movements which of course require money. What is terrorist financing? Jeff Breinholt coordinated the Department of Justice Terrorist Financing Task Force
Scientific Methods The law enforcement in the U.S.A. today is better equipped to handle the terrorism attacks and any terrorism threats than it was before the 9/11 incidence in America. This is evident in the general ways through which the security measures are implemented in the country and the intricate manner of investigations that take place to counter terrorism. Due to the nature of the data and information that is needed here,
Law Enforcement Differences Between Various Levels Of Law Enforcement Federal prisons are for conviction under Federal laws. State prisons are similar in all concepts and applications but are for convictions under state statutes (Albanese, 2002). Privatized prisons are owned by the state in which they are in and have been tried (or are being used) by several states on the assumption that a privately operated prison will cost less money over
ILEA's International Law Enforcement Academies The 1990's saw a tremendous change in the nature of international relations and international threats and crime in particular. The end of the Cold War and the fall of the Soviet Union opened a large portion of Central and Eastern Europe, formerly under the control of the U.S.S.R., to cooperation with nations of the West. This included the United States, which sought to improve international relations with
During the 1960's and 1970's, violent contact with the police, resulting in force occurred during anti-war, labor and civil rights demonstrations, during a politically tumultuous time. It is safe to conclude that excessive force was used during these clashes. Deaths and injuries were the results of political clashes at the Republican Convention in Chicago, during campus riots held at several universities, during political demonstrations held in public places and in