Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Business Ethics - Contemporary Case 2: Madoff's Investment Firm
The investment Ponzi scheme of Bernie Madoff and his hedge fund for wealthy clients was a major violation of ethics by Madoff, as he showed a severe lack of transparency (hiding his actions and never divulging how his trades were profitable) and a consistent habit of lying to clients by using one's fund to pay off another. Madoff's investment firm was essentially based on deception: he promised extraordinarily high returns on investments made the world's wealthy elite -- and so long as they did not all attempt to withdraw their investment at the same time, and so long as new investors continued to come to the firm, Madoff had enough capital on hand to pay out the promised returns. The fact that he did not actually make profitable investments with his clients' money, however, while claiming that he did so, is what caused the major problem for Madoff and his clients. Once authorities began to investigate Madoff's firm, clients began to withdraw funds and the house of cards collapsed: Madoff's Ponzi scheme came to a crashing halt and billions of dollars belonging to clients was lost (Schultz, Greenberg, 2009).
The ethical issue at the heart of the Madoff scandal was deception and was manifested in his lack of transparency and in his lies about what he could actually deliver to clients. Using Kidder's Ethical Checkpoints,...
Not only was he deceiving his clients, he was also deceiving himself with the thought that he could keep the charade going. Madoff was simply robbing Peter to pay Paul, as the maxim goes. His clients entrusted their savings with him with the expectation that they would receive a significant percentage of their investment in return each year. Yet Madoff had no real, legal or verifiable method of doing as he promised. His career was based on a deception. This was the moral issue that he needed to recognize and address in order to save both himself and his clients from loss.
The second checkpoint is: "Determine the Actor." In the case of Madoff's investment firm, he was the principal actor; although members of his family also worked in and for the firm, he was viewed by legal authorities as the primary party responsible for defrauding his clients. He testified that he never let on to what his firm was actually engaged in, and while speculation swirled as to how he could keep the deception from persons involved with the business, he himself was the main actor and…
Referenes
Schultz, K., Greenbert, D. (2009). Bernie Madoff's Billionaire Victims. Forbes.
Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/2009/03/12/madoff-guilty-plea-business-wall-street-celebrity-victims.html
Bernie Madoff's Fraud The United States economy has experienced tremendous challenges related to financial practices including illegal fiscal activities and practices. An example of an illegitimate financial activity that hurts the country's economy is Ponzi schemes and other fraudulent activities. The largest Ponzi scheme yet was orchestrated by Bernie Madoff whose fraudulent mechanism crossed several continents. Bernie Madoff's scheme is regarded as the largest one yet since it took something bigger
Madoff Securities case occurred because of fraudulent investment schemes due to lack of regulation as well as insufficient oversight of specific financial intermediaries along with dismissal of opportunistic behavior. To understand why such an incident happened in the first place, it is important to identify the kind of scheme led by Madoff. It is called a Ponzi scheme. In a Ponzi scheme, an unsustainably big pool of investors must be
Bernie Madoff Describe three types of illegal business behavior alleged against Mr. Madoff and for each type of behavior, explain how the behavior is illegal or unethical in the conduct of business. In the general sense, Madoff was accused of running a Ponzi scheme. This is a form of "pyramid scheme" in which essentially returns are paid to existing investors out of the principal being taken from new investors, eventually leading (as
security manager can do to prevent white collar crime. White collar crime and its prevention The masses are often inclined to associate criminal behaviors with individuals who are socially and economically disadvantaged. However, individuals who are part of privileged socioeconomic communities are also likely to engage in criminal activities. "The types of crime may differ from those of the lower classes, such as lawyers helping criminal clients launder their money, executives
In the first-round survey, a majority of investors cited diversification as their main objective in allocating to hedge funds. Among the second-round interviewees who were planning to increase their target allocations by 10% or more, half named diversification as the motivating factor. Among the approximately one in ten who were planning to decrease allocations by at least 10%, concern with a lack of transparency was the most frequently cited
KPMG served as the independent audit firm of several of the largest subprime mortgage lenders. Identify the advantages and disadvantages of a heavy concentration of audit clients in one industry or sub-industry (40marks). KPMG did indeed serve as the independent audit firm of many of the most massive subprime mortgage lenders in the nation. There are concrete benefits and drawbacks to such strong relationships in on particular field. The most fundamental