Management A Comparison Of Management And Leadership Term Paper

Management A Comparison of Management and Leadership

Management and leadership are often mistakenly considered to be the same thing. In truth, management and leadership are different processes and involve different activities. This means that a good leader is not necessarily a good manager, and that a good manager is not necessarily a good manager. This will now be discussed in more detail by comparing leadership and management and by comparing the traits of a leader and the traits of a manager.

Management can be broadly defined as the ability to manage resources to achieve goals. In practice, this refers to controlling both material resources and people to achieve the goals of the organization. Management can be further divided into the tasks of organizing, planning, controlling, and directing. The manager's role is to manage tasks and people on a consistent basis to ensure that goals are met.

Leadership is defined as "the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of goals" (Robbins 2001, p. 314). Like management, leadership is related to achieving goals. However it specifically refers to motivating and influencing people so that they take action to achieve goals. The leader's role involved motivating people and influencing them so that they want to act in ways that will meet the goals of the organization.

The role of the manager can be further explored by considering the key traits that are characteristics of a good manager. The first key trait is the ability to set goal and organize. This ability is essential to ensuring effective ongoing operations, since without goals, the demands of the organization cannot be met. This reference to goals does not refer to a manager setting goals for themselves. Instead, it refers to a manager setting goals for the department, teams, and individual employees. This goal-setting plays a key role in managing the ongoing operations of a company. The next key trait is good communication. There are several reasons why communication is vital. Firstly, management...

...

To manage the people of the department, a manager needs to be able to communicate clearly. This is essential to effective hiring, delegation, conflict management, and review processes. A manager will also normally need to coordinate the needs of their department with the other departments of the organization. This coordination allows the organization to function as a whole, with departments working effectively together to achieve the same overall goals. Without effective communication, a manager cannot coordinate with other departments effectively. Finally, there is often a need for managers to communicate effectively with people outside of the organization. This may involve dealing with customers, clients, suppliers, or service providers. It will be the manager's job to ensure that the departments and employees have whatever resources are needed, with this often requiring effective management with third parties. The third key trait of an effective manager is the ability to accept feedback and adapt to changes. Accepting feedback means that the manager gains the knowledge of what is going right, what is going wrong, and how things can be changed for the better. The ability to accept feedback is a key factor in constantly improving the department. It is also a key factor in managing conflict and in predicting and preventing problems. The ability to adapt to changes is also critical because a department is never operating in an isolated environment. Things change both within the company and outside of the company on a constant basis, and these changes impact the operation of the department. A good manager is aware of the changes and is able to be flexible and adapt, either to reduce problems or to take advantage of opportunities. The final key quality of a good manager is the ability to follow up and follow through. It must be remembered that a manager's job is to ensure that resources are being managed to achieve goals. While a manager's job is partly about planning for the future, it is largely about ensuring everything…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Robbins, S.P. (2001). Organizational Behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.


Cite this Document:

"Management A Comparison Of Management And Leadership" (2005, April 24) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/management-a-comparison-of-management-and-66467

"Management A Comparison Of Management And Leadership" 24 April 2005. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/management-a-comparison-of-management-and-66467>

"Management A Comparison Of Management And Leadership", 24 April 2005, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/management-a-comparison-of-management-and-66467

Related Documents

Management Principles Management Leadership Model Paper: Management Principles Research suggests that everyone is a manager in their own way. For instance, everyone manages his finances, time, careers and relationships. These examples of managing are simple and straightforward. However, when concepts of management apply in organizations, management becomes complex. At such a point, it calls for extensive studying in order to understand the theoretical basis of management. The application of management and the enunciation

Within this leadership framework, leaders motivate employees by directly promoting and modeling the desired personal commitment to the organization in a manner that often transcends the boundaries of the vocational environment. Instead of viewing their employment as merely an occupation or a quid pro quo arrangement, employees within a transformational organizational culture incorporate elements of their employing organization into their personal psychological orientation. In that regard, the mission, goals, and

(Ng, 1994, p. 93) The philosophy of Confucius was based essentially on that of human relationships expanded to the sphere of the state, and even beyond into the cosmos. Right conduct and proper action among individuals and groups would result in an ordered universe, one that operated according to the proper laws. By cultivating these believes and following these rules one could hope to produce a society that was perfectly

Executive SummaryThis paper provides an analysis of Herb Kelleher�s leadership of during his tenure as CEO of Southwest Airlines from 1971 to 2001. Under the charismatic Kelleher�s servant-leadership approach which placed a high priority on employee empowerment, Southwest transformed from a small regional carrier into the largest domestic low-cost airline in the U.S. Indeed, Kelleher was a textbook example of a �servant-first� leader that was effective in promoting employee satisfaction

Leadership and Organizations: Bill Gates and Steve Jobs The theories of leadership date way back to when dynasties existed and people were led by kings. The leader took control and made decisions whenever disputes arose. The question of leadership qualities may not have been all that important then, but people still considered some to be better leaders than others. It would be prudent to begin by giving the fundamentals of the

Leadership, according to La Monica (1938), is when a person has authority that is recognized by others, and the person has followers/subordinates under them, who believe that the person will assist them in attaining certain goals (carrying out specific objectives for the followers). Furthermore, anyone that is willing to assist and help others could be referred to as a leader (p.8) Leaders see what others do not Most leaders have