Mann, Existential Technology Just As Steve Mann's Term Paper

Mann, Existential Technology Just as Steve Mann's 2003 article "Existential Technology" appears to be a description and philosophical justification for the author's artwork, it could just as accurately be described as a work of eerie prophecy. Reading Mann's document a little over a decade after its initial publication gives the uneasy feeling that this conceptual artist has actually foreseen the future. Of course, this is in many ways the function of art, if we recall Ezra Pound's famous dictum that artists are the antennae of the human race, picking up cultural and historical signals before the rest of us do. But it is remarkable in 2014 to see just how much Mann was anticipating back in 2003.

Although Mann describes himself in the article as someone who has "lived as a cyborg for 30 years" ( Mann 25) what he really means by this is that he has been incorporating computers and information technology -- often in the form of what he calls "in (ter)ventions," his neologism for inventions (gadgets) that also enact an intervention (a form of resistance) in the prevailing culture. But the things that Mann was resisting in 2003 are surely far more salient now than they were then. Although he...

...

The sort of surveillance that was revealed by Edward Snowden's actions ten years later is so far beyond the level of what Mann was resisting in 2003 demands that we give Mann credit for extraordinary prescience.
Such concern with surveillance, though, is only one of many things in Mann's account that seems so new and salient in 2014 that it is astonishing to see how well he foresaw the direction in which daily life was heading. Mann discusses his "apparatus of computer-mediated reality (e.g. wearing a computer and living in a computer-generated world)" but this is a decade before the much-hyped Google Glass attempted to make a consumer item out of the idea. Indeed Google Glass sounds like it was inspired by Mann's account of his 2000 project involving his "EyeTap system, eyeglasses that cause the eye itself to function as if it were a camera" (Mann 21). Likewise Mann's 2001…

Sources Used in Documents:

Although Mann describes himself in the article as someone who has "lived as a cyborg for 30 years" ( Mann 25) what he really means by this is that he has been incorporating computers and information technology -- often in the form of what he calls "in (ter)ventions," his neologism for inventions (gadgets) that also enact an intervention (a form of resistance) in the prevailing culture. But the things that Mann was resisting in 2003 are surely far more salient now than they were then. Although he names "surveillance and monitoring technologies" -- i.e., the nonconsensual recording of information about individuals by large governments or corporations -- as one of the chief subjects of his explorations, the examples given by Mann are along the lines of CCTV camera surveillance and records of credit card swipes. The sort of surveillance that was revealed by Edward Snowden's actions ten years later is so far beyond the level of what Mann was resisting in 2003 demands that we give Mann credit for extraordinary prescience.

Such concern with surveillance, though, is only one of many things in Mann's account that seems so new and salient in 2014 that it is astonishing to see how well he foresaw the direction in which daily life was heading. Mann discusses his "apparatus of computer-mediated reality (e.g. wearing a computer and living in a computer-generated world)" but this is a decade before the much-hyped Google Glass attempted to make a consumer item out of the idea. Indeed Google Glass sounds like it was inspired by Mann's account of his 2000 project involving his "EyeTap system, eyeglasses that cause the eye itself to function as if it were a camera" (Mann 21). Likewise Mann's 2001 project "Ouijagree" is meant to deconstruct copyright restrictions on software, and his discussion of it extends to the possibility for deconstructing the intellectual property whereby PDF documents are held -- it is worth noting that the same academic institution whose press published Mann's article in 2003, M.I.T., would play a substantial role in the prosecution (and arguably the suicide) of Aaron Swartz, founder of Reddit, who killed himself after facing extraordinarily harsh prosecution for the mass downloading of copyrighted academic articles and documents, in an attempt to make them available for free.

Of course the examples of Snowden, Google Glass, and Aaron Swartz all demonstrate that the philosophical issues that Mann was making central to his art in 2003 would become mainstream objects of concern ten years later. To a certain degree, this is a simple fact of Mann's area of interest: by making computing and information technology central to his concerns, he was arguably well-placed to see the ways in which surveillance and governmental control were central to the development of such technology from the outset.


Cite this Document:

"Mann Existential Technology Just As Steve Mann's" (2014, January 28) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/mann-existential-technology-just-as-steve-181561

"Mann Existential Technology Just As Steve Mann's" 28 January 2014. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/mann-existential-technology-just-as-steve-181561>

"Mann Existential Technology Just As Steve Mann's", 28 January 2014, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/mann-existential-technology-just-as-steve-181561

Related Documents
Edward Snowden Essay
PAGES WORDS 2741

This essay reviews the relevant literature to provide a background on Edward Snowden and how his high-profile actions adversely affected the work of the National Security Agency (NSA). An analysis of what the NSA was doing prior to the leaks and how it collects intelligence information now is followed by an examination concerning what Snowden leaked and why. Finally, a discussion concerning whether the U.S. government violated Snowden’s constitutional rights

Criminal Justice Edward Snowden Is Edward Snowden a hero or traitor? Is Edward Snowden a hero or traitor? Edward Snowden used to work as an intelligence contractor. Lately he leaked information about some security projects. The leaked information is about secret program carried out by NASA and is a massive surveillance program. Snowden believes that the tax money of people of America is a liability on government and government institutions and hence they have

Patriotism/Edward Snowden Intstitution: Edward Snowden, 30, well-known for his previous job as a contractor in the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA), is presently living in Russia since his escape from the United States via Hong Kong, due to a revelation of extensive internet and phone surveillance carried out by U.S. intelligence. He used to live with his girlfriend in Hawaii, but after the revelation, initially left for Hong Kong, where his identity

PRISM- Edward Snowden PRISM PRISM, deployed by the NSA (National Security Agency) of United States, is a tool used for private electronic data gathering which belongs to the people who use leading internet services such as Gmail, Outlook, Facebook, etc. In the wake of 9/11, the latest effort made by the U.S. government for electronic surveillance is the development of PRISM, which initially started in the supremacy of President Bush with the

Technology and national security / privacy issues / Edward snowden The massive 9/11 attacks revealed some obvious flaws in our security system. Terrorists not only managed to slip through the immigration and airports but also managed to live, train and plan within the United States for many years. The resulting fear of other terrorist groups who might have been living and training in U.S. were justifiable. In this regard, congress came

Quandary of Prosecuting Edward Snowden The source of law that controls the prosecution of Edward Snowden is both federal and international law. Because Snowden is an American citizen who sought asylum overseas, he is outside of the direct jurisdiction of the U.S. government. Still, the U.S. government is the entity that wants Snowden for his crimes. Snowden has not committed any crimes except for those that violated the U.S. Snowden can