Verified Document

Media In The Courtroom High Profile Court Essay

Media in the Courtroom High profile court cases, especially murder trials and celebrity cases are more likely to attract the national media than ordinary cases that usually of no interest beyond the local level. These are also the kinds of cases when the issue of TV cameras in the courtroom is most significant, and when judges have to give serious thought to handing down gag orders that block all public discussion of the case for the duration of the trial. In this era of Internet, Facebook, 24-hour cable news and YouTube, any events or statements in the court can easily become 'viral' and be seen instantly by millions of people around the world. For most of the 20th Century, recording devices and movie and TV cameras were not allowed in the courts, but only reports from the print media and drawings by sketch artists. This technology existed for many decades before it was ever permitted inside the courtroom. Judges and attorneys were rightfully concerned that it would sensationalize trials, interfere with due process, and turn the court into a three-ring circus, and this has often been the case in televised trials like the O.J. Simpson and Michael Jackson trials, and most recently the Casey Anthony case.

A famous Los Angeles attorney who defended celebrities like Robert Blake and Michael Jackson was generally skeptical about the value of TV cameras in the courtroom. Thomas A. Mesereau thought that they created a "circuslike atmosphere," had an improper influence on witnesses, and turned serious cases into "cheap theatrics" (Mesereau 2011). Cameras turn a courtroom into...

Nor do the media have a good track record predicting the outcome of jury trials, since they overwhelmingly believed that O.J. Simpson, Casey Anthony and Michael Jackson would be convicted, but they were acquitted.
Unlike the courts, the purpose of the media is not to provide equal justice under the law, but to make money and increase their ratings by providing entertainment. Attorneys have to be prepared for media attacks and negative spin against their clients by preparing a more positive image. In fact, they have to advertise and sell them just like they were any product. Michael Jackson was accused of child molestation, which if possible is an even worse charge than murder as far as public opinion is concerned. His lawyers were desperate to find some way to turn this image into one of a man who had had a difficult childhood and was concerned with charitable activities for children. O.J. Simpson's attorneys used TV cameras in the courtroom to put the police on trial and portray them as racist, but in all these cases "a proper media strategy will take into account the social environment surrounding the case" (Mesereau 2011).

The Casey Anthony case in Florida was one of the more recent murder trials that attracted national media attention and was broadcast on TV every day until she was acquitted of murdering her daughter. Like the O.J. Simpson and Michael Jackson cases, this one was a media circus and soap opera,…

Sources used in this document:
REFERENCES

Ferguson, R. 2011. "Cameras in the Courtroom." The American Spectator.

http://spectator.org/archives/2011/07/19/cameras-in-the-courtroom

Mesereau, T.A. 2011. "Effectively Handling High-Profile and Celebrity Cases." Los Angeles Lawyer, Survival Guide for New Attorneys in California, Fall 2011 Issue

http://www.mesereauyu.com/los-angeles-lawyer-effectively-handling-high-profile-and-celebrity-cases
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Hearsay When Kobe Bryant Faced
Words: 981 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Proposal

Some of these exceptions could have applied to the Kobe Bryant prosecution. The medical exam evidence could have been allowed had the alleged victim not placed fault on Mr. Bryant. The burden would then have been on the prosecution to prove Mr. Bryant's fault. However, the prosecution submitted a conclusory statement with regards to the findings at the medical exam. Had they not done so, an exception to the hearsay

Count 3996 Most Important
Words: 4005 Length: 13 Document Type: Research Paper

They also had the power to decide the merits of evidence and arguments. In the 19th century, judges gained greater control over juries and the role of juries became what it is currently; hearing evidence presented on both sides and determining the guilt or innocence of the accused. The advantages of the jury system lie in the foundational elements articulated and supported by amendments and the Supreme Court. The Sixth

Canadian Corrections and Criminal Justice System
Words: 1715 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

Canadian criminal justice system corrections The Canadian justice system Since the last decade, there's been a huge hue and cry pertaining unjust convictions and its disastrous consequences. As in the case of Canada, there have been numerous high profile cases which concluded with unjust verdicts, putting the Canadian justice system and its judicial process in question. Even though, the media's attention has increased on this matter, academic literature on the issue

Police Use of Deadly Force
Words: 6054 Length: 20 Document Type: Capstone Project

367 Although the incidence of deadly force use has likely remained steady in the first five categories, Russell and Beigel emphasize that based on the increased attention being directed at the "stake-out and drugs" category, these rates are likely much higher today. What quickly emerges from these foregoing trends, though, is just how quickly even innocuous encounters such as stops for traffic offenses with ordinary citizens can escalate to the

Fault: An Alternative to the Current Tort-Based
Words: 30263 Length: 110 Document Type: Thesis

Fault: An Alternative to the Current Tort-Based System in England and Wales The United Kingdom statistics regarding claims THE NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM OBSTACLES TO DUE PROCESS THE CASE FOR REFORM THE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT THE RISING COST OF LITIGATION LORD WOOLF'S REFORMS MORE COST CONTROLS THE UNITED STATES PAUL'S PULLOUT THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY TORT REFORM IN AMERICA FLEEING PHYSICIANS STATISTICS FOR ERROR, INJURY AND DEATH THE CALL FOR REFORM IN 2003: A FAMILIAR REFRAIN THE UNITED STATES SITUATION, IN SUMMARY NEW ZEALAND CASE STUDIES THE SWEDISH SCHEME COMPARISON: WHICH SYSTEM IS

Scott Peterson Trial Has Provoked
Words: 1894 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

Although in this particular case it seemed that Scott Peterson was guilty, even if the evidence was just circumstantial, this type of evidence has sent many people to death, only to find out later that they were not guilty. This is actually a flaw of the jury system. The European continental system lets a judge appreciate whether a person is guilty or not of some crime. Since judges have

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now