Mencius' Theory Different Than That Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
986
Cite

Confucius had mentioned filial concern, but Mencius places emphasis on this filial concern prioritizing between special concern for and obligations towards family that is closest to oneself gradating down to others, and stated proper attitude to family as essential to order in society (Lau, 1970). Mencius extended yi to refer not only to propriety of conduct, but also to self-dignity / self-respect. For instance, he provides the example of a beggar who, starving to death, would, and should, rather die than accept food given to him in a contemptuous manner. 'Yi', as are the other traits, are innate in the individual. One has to cultivate this trait so that one lives one's life according to a certain modicum of self-respect and ethical standards (Shun, 1997).

Mencius retained 'li's connotation to proper conduct but he extended it to the formulation that tendency to accord to 'li' and its nuances (or rules) in the required and proper manner is innate. Appended to it, Mencius described some of the attitudes and required mental conduct of 'li' such as expected conduct in mourning, and ceremonial niceties in social interaction. When necessary, Mencius recommends that certain aspects of 'li' should be disregarded (Shun, 1997).

Mencius also adopts a fourth term, 'zhi' which he translates as 'wisdom'. Early Chinese thought regarded the heart as the base of both cognitive and affective operations (Nivison, 1996). This was the heart/mind of Mencius' 'zhi' (Shun, 1997), which requires the ability to follow affect or cognition according to one's best discretion, to balance...

...

Heart/mind must be in accordance; both should be used, but man should employ his better judgment in deciding which to use according to the appropriate situation.
Mencius also prescribed persistence and calm, and the habit to steadfastly pursue one's goal despite setbacks and anxiety. The focus should be on effort, with an endeavored fortitude to accepting ming the fate or mandates that are beyond or contrary to one's control (Lau, 1970).

Finally, and in a political sense, Confucius merely elaborated on three terms: tian (Heaven), ming (destiny or decree) and de (power, or virtue) using Tian -- the sky -- in a sense that best correlates to the Western idea of an omnipotent God, Ming -- refers to the ruler's mandate and powers from tian to rule, and the ruler's attributes -- whilst De -- refers to qualities such as honesty, generosity, humility, dedication, and most importantly, caring for the people and diligence to his duties (if the ruler has these qualities, he is granted Tian Ming -- the Mandate from heaven to rule). Mencius later added to this the statement that the people's opinions should be taken into consideration particularly in the equation of significant matters (Nivison, 1996; Shun, 1997).

Source

Lau, D.C. (1970) Mencius. London: Penguin.

Nivison, D.S. (1996). The ways of Confucianism: Investigations in Chinese Philosophy. Ill: Open Court.

Shun, K.L. (1997). Mencius and early Chinese thought. CA: Stanford…

Sources Used in Documents:

Lau, D.C. (1970) Mencius. London: Penguin.

Nivison, D.S. (1996). The ways of Confucianism: Investigations in Chinese Philosophy. Ill: Open Court.

Shun, K.L. (1997). Mencius and early Chinese thought. CA: Stanford Univ. Press.


Cite this Document:

"Mencius' Theory Different Than That" (2010, December 05) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/mencius-theory-different-than-that-6091

"Mencius' Theory Different Than That" 05 December 2010. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/mencius-theory-different-than-that-6091>

"Mencius' Theory Different Than That", 05 December 2010, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/mencius-theory-different-than-that-6091

Related Documents

Mencius saw Tian as the source of morality and social sanction (if the king was good, Heaven enabled him to rule). Hsun Tzu, on the other hand, perceived heaven as dispassionate and unresponsive at best to human predicament and existence, He therefore advocated that man should not look to Tian for assistance or attempt to placate or please tian, but rather endeavor to craft his own fate (Watson, 2003).

Mencius thought that virtue was a matter to be developed while Xunzi felt that what was required was not development, but reshaping. The first is like a sprout coming out in a tree whereas the second is like a piece of wood being shaped into an object required by humans. (Chinese Philosophy) Apart from the argument as to whether goodness comes to man from birth or the state, man should

This is very true because even in modern times students who desire to attain good grades will endeavor for that, but a student who has no desire will only go to school to pass time. This analogy can also be vice versa, a petty man can become a gentleman and a gentleman can also become a petty man Austin, Page 106. The main reason they do not change places is

Intellectually my mind was saying: how could this happen in an open and public place with dozens of people walking in the area? There was also a sense of moral anger at the way that social rules and norms were being so openly being flouted. This feeling was strong and related to the physical sense of disgust and distress that I felt at the situation. Reciprocity The above aspects, the physical,

Human Nature Has Been a
PAGES 7 WORDS 2811

He exemplifies by saying that anyone witnessing a child about to fall in a well would immediately turn to rescue the child without seeking any advantages in doing so. But while this position has been argued on the grounds that "such an example is not intended to prove that all men will actually take some action in such circumstances" (Allinson apud Chan 1996), Chan has defended Mencius by emphasizing

John Rawls / Mencius John Rawls's A Theory of Justice is concerned with distributive rather than retributive justice: there is precious little discussion of crime and punishment in Rawls's magnum opus, but plenty of discussion about equality and fairness. Rawls seems to be embarked on a Kantian ethical project of establishing universal principles, but his chief concern is to establish his principles without requiring, as Kant does, an appeal to God