Minority and Social Relations Between Christians and Muslims in the Mediterranean In the 14th century, a change was occurring on the Iberian Peninsula. This is when the Christians were able to expel the Muslims and cement the foundations for modern European expansionism. To fully understand what took place requires examining the books The Royal Treasure and...
Introduction Want to know how to write a rhetorical analysis essay that impresses? You have to understand the power of persuasion. The power of persuasion lies in the ability to influence others' thoughts, feelings, or actions through effective communication. In everyday life, it...
Minority and Social Relations Between Christians and Muslims in the Mediterranean In the 14th century, a change was occurring on the Iberian Peninsula. This is when the Christians were able to expel the Muslims and cement the foundations for modern European expansionism. To fully understand what took place requires examining the books The Royal Treasure and The Muslims of Valencia. This will be accomplished by focusing on: the author's thesis / supporting arguments, life between Christians / Muslims and the thesis established on minority dissident.
Together, these elements will highlight the social relations between these groups during this time. Both author's thesis and supporting arguments on populations groups' hegemony was secured and established dissident minority According to Boswell (1977), the Muslims living in Valencia and other areas were provided with greater amounts of protection under the King in comparison with the Catholic Church. This is because the crown allowed them to maintain their cultural practices, forms of dress and legal system. At the same time, they had their own set of basic rights that were respected.
The most notable include: the ability to assemble in public, openly practice their religion, bear arms, buy / sell / inherit property and the right to travel / immigrate to various regions. However, in spite of these protections, they could be eliminated at any point in time by the nobles, landholders, the clergy or the crown. This meant that the Muslims were allowed to maintain a certain way of life. Yet, they were considered to be non-Spaniards and did not have full protection under the law.
Instead, they were tolerated by the local officials, who did not want to ferment any kind of anger or animosity inside this segment of the population. This is because they were fighting a larger war against the Muslims in the South of the country. That was not resolved until the Moors were defeated in Granada during the late 14th century. In order to maintain stability, meant that society had to accept the Muslims.
However, they were not provided with the same basic protections or were viewed as equals by the Spanish. In this aspect, Boswell argues that these groups were afforded a certain amount of guarantees. But, there was always the possibility they could lose these rights at any point in time from a number of officials. What Meyerson (1991) determined, is that King Ferdinand wanted to keep this population separate. Although, he also needed to ensure they were a vital part of the local economy.
This meant walking a fine line by respecting their traditions and offering them with certain rights. Yet, he did not fully trust or believe that the Muslim population was dedicated to Spanish interests. This resulted in this segment facing abuse at the hands of local lords and clergy (who did not want them there). They would openly support the policies of King. However, beneath the surface; they stripped away their land, restricted their movement and charged many individuals with violating different aspects of the law.
In this aspect, the Muslims hegemony was secured and established based upon what they could contribute to the local economy. This meant that it appeared as if they were afforded with various protections in society. Yet, the reality is, they were subject to abuses from local officials. This offered them with the ability to challenge some of the events that were occurring. But, it also meant that they were powerless to do anything about it.
As a result, their support was secured through providing them with just enough protections to make everyone happy and not allowing them to enjoy the same rights as Spanish citizens. Both main argument(s) on life between Christians and Muslims The main arguments presented by both authors are that were select amounts of segregation which existed inside Spanish society towards the Muslims. This meant that they lived in their own communities and continued to embrace their different cultural traditions / religious practices.
However, if there was ever a conflict between these individuals and the Spanish. The locals were favored over the Muslims. In this aspect, Boswell and Meyerson believe that this system was established to prevent any kind of uprising from the community by having them not feeling completely alienated. Furthermore, this segment helped to contribute to the local economy and promote stability inside many quarters. At a time when they were fighting the Muslims elsewhere; this strategy was used to maintain order.
However, it also prevented them from becoming to dominate in Spanish society and obtaining any kind of power or wealth in the process. This ensured that the crown was able to maintain the status quo and effectively control them through utilizing an approach that offered select amounts of protection. But, in reality, they could have anything taken away from them if a person gained too much influence or wealth in the process. This is illustrating how a system of subjugation existed beneath the scenes.
That was designed to protect the status quo at all times. Books author's thesis on established dissident minority groups. Boswell's main thesis is that the Muslims were an integral part of 14th century Spanish society. This required that the crown could not directly persecute or subjugate them to various abuses. Instead, they had to offer them with certain types of protections. At the same time, they were under pressure from the Catholic Church and various nobles to restrict their activities.
This meant that they were afforded a certain amount of freedoms and the ability to live their own lives. However, these individuals could not become too prominent or economically powerful. Meyerson believed that this approach was utilized to maintain economic and political stability. This is because they did not want to alienate this segment. Instead, they wanted to ensure that they contributed economically and prevented them from supporting the Moors in the South. This required using these practices to show that they can sustain their culture and receive certain protections.
Yet, they could not become overly dominate or powerful within society. When this happened, local officials would directly intervene in order to prevent them from overshadowing Spanish citizens. References Boswell, John. The royal treasure: Muslim communities under the Crown of Aragon in the fourteenth century. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977. Cohen, Yehuda. The Spanish. Portland: Sussex Academic Press, 2012. Menocal, Maria.
The remaining sections cover Conclusions. Subscribe for $1 to unlock the full paper, plus 130,000+ paper examples and the PaperDue AI writing assistant — all included.
Always verify citation format against your institution's current style guide.