Montesquieu Charles De Secondat, Baron De La Term Paper

Montesquieu Charles de Secondat, Baron de la Montesquieu is vastly honored and credited for his contribution to the democratic structure of the United States of America, so that due partly to his brilliance, America fell into serious civil bloodshed only once in more than 200 years. He advocated constitutionalism civil liberties, the abolition of slavery, moderation and peace, social and economic justice, the rule of law, the balance of power and social equality. He viewed republic and despotic governments as inversely proportionate, in that in republican governments, men were equal and everything, while in despotic governments, they were equal and nothing. He went up against all forms of extremism and fanaticism and against despotic rule by individuals or groups.

He understood that luxury became necessarily absolute in monarchies, such as in the use of liberty. But he also held that abuse of servitude became absolutely necessary in despotic states. From these lines of thoughts, he arrived at the very natural reflection and conclusion that republics end with luxury and monarchies with poverty.

In his Spirit of the Laws (1748), he stressed the absolute necessity of balancing the three branches...

...

In illustrating the necessity, he compared kingdoms in Europe and those in Asia, using Italy and Turkey, respectively (Halsall 1997). In his book, he said that most European kingdoms (or governments) enjoyed moderate government, because the head posses only two of the first powers and shared the third with his or her subjects or people. He further wrote that these three powers were united in the example of the republic of Italy, resulting in less liberty in European monarchies. In the case of the Asian example, Turkey in the East, the three powers of government were united and in the hand of the sultan only, so that his subjects necessarily felt burdened and oppressed. In such cases, Montesquieu wrote that the same monarch or body of magistrates may plunder the state, since they also had the power to judge.
Book 17 number 6 states that, geographically, Asia has by nature the greater ability to survive because of certain natural endowments, such as many large prairies, large pieces of sea and springs that run dry more easily. He also wrote that power in Asia has to be despotic precisely because of its geographic design or structure. On the other…

Sources Used in Documents:

BIBIOGRAPHY

1. Halsall, Paul (1997). Montesquieu: the Spirit of the Laws, 1748. Modern History Sourcebook (accessed 07:05:03). http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/montesquieu-spirit.html

2. Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat, Baron de. Spirit of the Laws, 1748. Book 17.6. Electronic Text Center: University of Virginia Center for Religion and Democracy. http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/ebooks/ebooklist.html


Cite this Document:

"Montesquieu Charles De Secondat Baron De La" (2003, May 07) Retrieved May 18, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/montesquieu-charles-de-secondat-baron-de-150093

"Montesquieu Charles De Secondat Baron De La" 07 May 2003. Web.18 May. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/montesquieu-charles-de-secondat-baron-de-150093>

"Montesquieu Charles De Secondat Baron De La", 07 May 2003, Accessed.18 May. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/montesquieu-charles-de-secondat-baron-de-150093

Related Documents

Origins and Characteristics of the Law and Legal Systems in the U.S. The Origins and Characteristics of the Law and Legal Systems in the United States The origins and characteristics of the law and legal systems of the United States It is a commonplace observation to state that the Declaration of Independence and The Constitution of the U.S. are the origin of and provide the characteristics of the legal systems of the U.S. But

Rather, corruption continued and the widespread execution of revolutionaries by Maximilien Robespierre and Louis de Saint-Just of the Committee of Safety was largely justified with the radicalized views of Enlightenment philosopher Rousseau with regard to the revolution (Church; Lefebvre; Rude). Robespierre's distorted perception of Rousseau's views lead to an adamant and unwaivering desire to drive the revolution forward at any cost, including that of substantial human life. Robespierre was