Kohlberg's Moral Stages
What would you do if confronted with this same dilemma?
If I was confronted with this dilemma, I would tell the truth about my son and not let my wife take the blame. However, I would not do so out of higher moral principles but because I would tend to assume that law enforcement would likely figure out eventually what was the truth and then both my son and my wife might suffer severe consequences, instead of only my son, once the authorities were involved. It is also worthy of note that the son might not be willing to allow his mother to take the blame, further complicating the issue when arguing with authorities.
Although it may be difficult to gain legal assistance, the best that can be done is admit to nothing and to request legal aid from the U.S. embassy, although there may be some reluctance to help the son given that this is technically a drug crime. Hopefully, the minimal nature of the offense will garner some sympathy from the U.S. government although it is unlikely to do so from the foreign authorities. Regardless, my ethical focus would be on protecting my son but doing so in a way that was effective and did not result in harm occurring to my innocent wife as well.
Q2. At what level and which stage/s of Kohlberg's Moral Development would this dilemma go into?
This scenario entertains...
On a very basic, first level, it could be argued that the son should have to suffer the consequences of his actions and be punished. On a secondary level, it could be argued that the son transgressed his duty to keep the needs of others in mind, namely his parents. But on the third level of pleasing others -- although the mother may want to please her son, come forward, and take responsibility for the crime instead, the son clearly acted without thought of how his parents might react to his crime as well as the foreign country's officials. The fourth level of moral understanding of law and order might suggest that given the severity of the drug problem, a nation has the right to take a strong stance in opposition.
The fifth level argues for a more nuanced understanding of what constitutes the law. Simply because something is illegal does not mean that an extremely…
Bowman et al. (2010) states that "third-level reasoning…prevents abuse of professional skills for one's own advantage or for that of one's social group" (2010). Kohlberg believed that the U.S. government, the official morality, requires fifth stage moral reasoning (Lewis & Gilman 2005). This level asks for respect of individual rights and it accepts critically examined values (2005). While this stage is not the highest stage (the highest being a stage
MORAL DEVELOPMENT & GENDER CARE | Moral Development and Gender Care Theories Moral Development Moral development in humans occurs naturally together with physical, social and mental development. Individually as well as in social settings, mankind evolves a developed moral character and conscience in spite of numerous social and psychological barriers, which temporarily retard or disturb the process. In axiology, concepts of moral development give rise to feelings of being an active and developing
Understanding Moral Intelligence Introduction Moral intelligence is a crucial aspect of our cognitive abilities that guides us in making ethical decisions and understanding right from wrong. It is the capacity to understand the ethical principles that govern human behavior and to apply them in daily life. This unique form of intelligence goes beyond traditional measures of intelligence, such as IQ, and focuses on the development of a person's character and values. Unlike other
Moral Development/Kohlberg Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development: Therapeutic Implications Kohlberg continues to be a significant figure and influence on the field of psychology. He is well-known for his theory of moral development which details different stages of morality throughout one's life. Although the theory has faced criticisms, particularly due to a questionable generalization to all cultures, it continues to be a basis of knowledge and usefulness in practice. In regards to
Kohlberg When it comes to socialization, circles of friends, peer groups and so forth, it is clear that there is what is considered healthy and what is considered less than optimal. Beyond there, there will always tend to be subgroups and subcultures that emerge from within and from under a more dominant culture. This brief report shall describe the importance of peer groups, how subcultures can emerge and the significance of
Kohlberg's theory of moral development presents three levels with two stages each of moral reasoning. The reason or motive for the behavior of an individual is what defines each stage (Crain, 1985). In order to come up with this developmental theory Kohlberg carried out studies using various dilemmas and finding out how the subjects responded. His main interest in the process is not a "yes" or "no" said by the