When this happens, there is a possibility that these countries could lose their competitive edge because of the new guidelines. (Markowitz, 2011, pp. 139-151) (Jebberger, 2011)
Moreover, there are concerns about sovereignty and the scope of authority for international organizations (when operating inside the borders of a specific nation state). At the heart of these challenges, is if they have the power to enforce these provisions (when a particular individual or entity could go to the courts and negate these decisions). Once this happens, is the point that there will be areas of contention as to who is the final authority in these kinds of matters. (Markowitz, 2011, pp. 139 -- 151) (Jebberger, 2011)
A good example of this can be seen with observations from Markowitz (2012). He said, "Central to closing the gap between policy goals and environmental protection are the people and institutions charged with assuring compliance with environmental laws and enforcing them effectively. In order to apply legal rules to circumstances that are complex and frequently entangled with the competing interests of different stakeholders, judges, attorneys-generals, and prosecutors need clear and enforceable laws, specialized training, reliable information, public confidence, and political will. Multidisciplinary approaches to capacity building for parliamentarians, inspectors, prosecutors, and judges are central to success." (Markowitz, 2011, pg. 139)
This is showing how a new approach must be taken that will incorporate local and international environmental laws together. This can be achieved...
When this happens, it is more difficult for businesses to use the legal system to circumvent different guidelines that are being enforced on the international level. (Markowitz, 2011, pp. 139-151)
If this kind of approach is used, it will provide an effective mechanism for ensuring that MEAs are enforced on the local level. This is when cooperation will improve among the various stakeholders. It is at this point that there will be a transformation in the how these laws are applied and the scope of authority regulators will have in these areas.
As a result, the lack of unity will shape how these regulations are applied through: creating more standards and protocols. Once this happens, is the point that many of these challenges can be effectively dealt with over the long-term. (Markowitz, 2011, pp. 139-151) in the future, this model will ensure that everyone is able to comply with these regulations and work together in addressing these issues. This will create a standard that is enforceable by taking into account the needs of various stakeholders during the process.
References
Jebbergrer, C. (2011). Multilateral Environmental Agreements. (IFO Working Paper 98). New York, NY: UN Printing Office.
Markowitz, K. (2012). The Importance of the Judiciary in Environmental Compliance. Pace Environmental Law Review, 538, 139 -- 151
O'Neill, M. (2002). Agriculture, the EC and the TWO: A legal critical analysis of the concepts…
