Nature Of True Love In Plato's "Symposium" Term Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
990
Cite

¶ … nature of true love in Plato's "Symposium" Rather famously, the ancient Greeks had multiple words for different aspects of the emotion we English-speaking moderns now term "love." In Plato's dialogue "The Symposium," defining the exact nature of love during a drinking party grips the philosophical imagination of Socrates and numerous other revelers at the house of a man named Agathon. The drinking party includes many individuals exposing their different ideas about the true nature of love. However, only Socrates offers a view of love that encompasses not simply the relationship between earthly individuals. Instead, Socrates suggests an individualistic pursuit of love by the soul, where it cleaves to the good in a non-sexual, and what came to be known as a 'Platonic' form of affection, is the ultimate goal of exercising in physical and spiritual love in the world. For Socrates, all aspects of earthly love are merely simulacra, or necessary but ultimately replicable forms of the true love that the soul cleaves for in relation to something higher and is procreative not of children or desire, but wisdom.

The "Symposium" proceeds in a dramatic fashion. Its first extended definition of love that is significant to the definitions that follow, begins with a comparison between the love of men and women, asserting finally that the love of men (because it is spiritual rather than purely physical in its inclination). Later, this becomes clarified by very beautiful myth told by one of the participants, of how love is defined as the...

...

However, in such a conceptualization, the most powerful form of love and the unity of love are still expressed through the medium of two individuals in a state of physical, rather than purely intellectual congress.
Interestingly enough, as a kind of antidote to conceptualizing love only in a homoerotic fashion, Socrates speaks of his own, previous dialogue between himself and a woman called Diatoma, when discussing his profound revelation about the nature of love. Socrates suggests that human relationships with other humans are simply preparations for the soul's casting off of the material world and entering into a divine congress with something better, with a higher understanding. This is, narratively speaking, not unlike the way the symposium itself progresses, with some hiccups, no pun intended, as it moves from an earthly conception of physical love, to a love that encompasses both the physical and the spiritual, and finally to Socrates' understanding of the physical world as simply a preparation for something higher.

Socrates states that earthly love can take many forms, from the love for money, even for the love of one's own physical health, and the higher love of beauty and the desire to procreate children. But what these forms of love merely strive for is…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Plato. "The Symposium." From Complete Works. Edited by John Copper. Indianapolis: Hackett 1997, 488-505.


Cite this Document:

"Nature Of True Love In Plato's Symposium " (2004, March 06) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/nature-of-true-love-in-plato-symposium-164783

"Nature Of True Love In Plato's Symposium " 06 March 2004. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/nature-of-true-love-in-plato-symposium-164783>

"Nature Of True Love In Plato's Symposium ", 06 March 2004, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/nature-of-true-love-in-plato-symposium-164783

Related Documents
Love in Symposium
PAGES 5 WORDS 1832

Plato's Symposium In order to answer the question of what 'love' means to Plato/Socrates in the Symposium, the most important aspect is to explain how the other participants define it before Socrates weighs in with his more philosophical and spiritual explanation. All of these participants are wealthy, privileged young men from the aristocratic class, except of course for Socrates who comes from the artisan class. They are arrogant, shallow, and

Symposium is one of the most critically analyzed pieces of ancient literature, because it expresses in a fascinating format the lifestyle of the Athenian elite, as well as the intellectual maturity of the philosopher Socrates. While studying the nature of love may be a discussion of low importance to modern philosophers, an emotional reaction so strong as love is to human nature has always been a remarkable aspect of human

Plato vs. Freud on eros and sexuality Plato's concept of love mandates two rectifications. Both of these rectifications are necessary in order for us to appreciate the relevance of Plato's theory of love to contemporary problems. The first depiction comports with the non-sexual aspect of the loving relationship, because Plato's theory of love indeed includes sex. The second depiction, or rectification, is related inextricably to the heterosexual aspect of the loving relationship.

Indeed, when Alcibiades arrives, we are reminded that love is quite extraordinary, and even Diotima suggests this to her pupil: "For love, Socrates, is not, as you imagine, the love of the beautiful only." "What then?" "The love of generation and of birth in beauty." "Yes," I said. "Yes, indeed," she replied. "But why of generation?" "Because to the mortal creature, generation is a sort of eternity and immortality"

Plato's theory of Being and Becoming, and its relations to the forms, is rooted in the dichotomy between being and not-being. Prior to Socrates the Sophists, from Parminedes to Gorgias, had argued that because it was impossible by definition for Nothing to exist, it was impossible to describe or vocalize a negative state, and therefore also impossible to utter falsehood. "And now arises the greatest difficulty of all. If

Plato's Philosopher King Plato and the Philosopher-King With the Allegory of the Cave, Plato expresses the notion that the best thing a philosopher can do is lead the people and that, in turn, a leader (king) must be a philosopher. Plato emphasizes this idea by equating the unenlightened citizens of his Republic to prisoners in chains (they are, in effect, chained by their ignorance of reality and transcendental truth). The philosopher is