Symposium is one of the most critically analyzed pieces of ancient literature, because it expresses in a fascinating format the lifestyle of the Athenian elite, as well as the intellectual maturity of the philosopher Socrates. While studying the nature of love may be a discussion of low importance to modern philosophers, an emotional reaction so strong as love is to human nature has always been a remarkable aspect of human life. In addition, in the time of the Symposium, Greek mythology had largely avoided the topic of an emotional love, in favor of violence, war, and lust. Therefore, the topic of love was not only one which could be shared within a room of men, but was actually a rather progressive topic which was understood in incredibly different ways than the modern concept of love. To better understand the lessons of the Symposium, one must study the nature of love from the two most prominent speakers on the topic, as well as come to a determination as to why Socrates' opinion was considered superior enough to bring an end to the debate on the nature of love.
The subject of love in the ancient world is an interesting one, because generally, marriage and procreation was about power and property, not love. Love is a relational property because Love does not have any properties of its own. Rather, it connects someone who desires something with the thing they desire. Thus, Love is not wise nor rich nor beautiful nor any of the other things we might ascribe to an object of desire. Rather, Love is that desire which finds itself in the absence of all these praiseworthy qualities. Presenting Love as a relation clarifies its position and identifies the flaws in the earlier speeches given. But in treating this relation as a thing with a nature and properties of its own, Plato is inching toward philosophically dangerous ground.
Agathon's speech on love, and the God of love, Eros, is generally well received by the audience, who enjoy the passion brought to Agathon's comments on the subject. Agathon believes that, "Eros is the best of the gods, young and good looking, with supreme strength and ultimately bearing good intentions for mankind" (Symposium, 193), an important distinction in a mythology filled with anti-human deities and supreme beings. This view is in opposition to Phaedrus' claim that Eros is old. Agathon continues by describing how Eros does not simply interact with humans' physical forms, but also their emotions and feelings, proving just how powerful and unique of a god that Eros is. Eros also had a positive effect on the Gods on Mount Olympus, who governed the world with less rage and chaos because of the influence that Eros had brought to the gods.
Socrates' complaint with Agathon's conception of love sweeps the Symposium's prior stories and philosophies aside, due in part to Plato's favoritism for his teacher, and part because of Socrates' immense abilities to whittle away at non-truths in the pursuit of logic. Finding the cause for why something is as it is, rather than simply suggesting a list of non-well reasoned guesses as the party had done. Socrates begins his critique of the Symposium's speeches thus far by noting how absolutely no form of logical argument can be made to support the claims by any of the participants. Indeed, the flowery stories woven so exquisitely only served to hide the truth of the subject under a weight of expectation.
Socrates focuses on Agathon's claim that Eros does not seek out what he requires, but rather spreads joy and happiness with no restraint. Socrates sees a flaw in this logic; if Love only wishes to spread love, then is the act of Eros spreading love not a selfish gesture? When one desires above all else love, then that becomes their necessity, thus proving that Eros is indeed a god simply acting out of his own wishes and desires, and therefore is not the selfless being that Agathon had described.
Socrates continues his speech by discussing the woman Diotima, and her lessons for Socrates. She says, "that above all else one must have a justified opinion" (Symposium, 201). If one simply holds a "true opinion" which is offered without justification, then it could be said that it is not a wise position to hold, even if it is true, because the holder of that opinion does not have a grasp of the wisdom of such an opinion. Diotima explains that love is neither good nor bad, but rather simply...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now