Navigating The Department Of Defense Acquisition Process Research Paper

PAGES
35
WORDS
9214
Cite

¶ … secondary literature and a survey of practitioners concerning the fact that Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) acquisition costs are often excessive because first article testing (FAT) requirements are often misapplied to DLA contracts. This study was guided by three objectives: (a) to determine the frequency of misapplication of First Article Testing requirements to Defense Logistic Agency contracts; (b) to determine Engineering Support Agency and Defense Logistics Agency employee interpretations of First Article Testing requirements; and, (c) to provide Engineering Support and Defense Logistics Agency employees with First Article test requirement discriminators that will assist with appropriate First Article Test requirement application to Defense Logistics Agency contracts. This study was also guided by the following research questions: (a) what major factors do Engineers and Defense Logistics Agency employees consider prior to applying First Article Test requirements to contracts?, and (b) what specific discriminators can be applied to First Article Test requirement decision making process? A summary of the research and important findings, answers to the guiding research questions and future directions for research are presented in the study's concluding chapter. First Article Testing Costs for Defense Logistics Agency Contracts

Course

October 17, 2014

Table of Contents

Chapter 1: Definition of the Problem

Problem Statement

Research Objectives

Research Hypothesis/Research Questions

Assumptions

Definitions of Terms

Limitations and Delimitations

Chapter 2: Literature Review

Chapter 3: Methodology

Chapter 4: Data Analysis

Chapter 5: Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations

Chapter 1: Definition of the Problem

Problem Statement

The Defense Logistics Agency Acquisition (J7) Directorate is tasked with the management of the establishment and operations of overall procurement policy and oversight for DLA's 5.2 million managed items (DLA mission, 2014). According to the DLA's Web site, "With nearly $35 billion in annual sales, DLA buys, stores and distributes food, fuel, uniform apparel, pharmaceutical, medical and surgical products and equipment and weapons system repair parts for the military services and other customers worldwide" (DLA mission, 2014, para. 3). The Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (OUSD (AT&L)'s Guide for Performance-Based Service Acquisition and the Seven Step Process (ACQ 265) (2009) describes the first article testing regimen requirements for the DLA: "Production testing is planned, conducted, and monitored by the materiel developer. FAT includes preproduction and initial production testing conducted to ensure that the contractor can furnish a product that meets the established technical criteria" (p. 120).

In sum, first article testing and approval ensures that the contractor can furnish a product that conforms to all contract requirements for acceptance (First article testing and approval, 2014). Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) acquisition costs, though, are often excessive because First Article Testing (FAT) requirements are often misapplied to DLA contracts, a problem that is investigated further through a systematic review of the secondary peer-reviewed, scholarly and governmental literature based on the research objectives and hypothesis outlined below.

Research Objective

The overarching objectives of this study were three-fold as follows:

1. To determine the frequency of misapplication of First Article Testing requirements to Defense Logistic Agency contracts;

2. To determine Engineering Support Agency and Defense Logistics Agency employee interpretations of First Article Testing requirements; and,

3. To provide Engineering Support and Defense Logistics Agency employees with First Article test requirement discriminators that will assist with appropriate First Article Test requirement application to Defense Logistics Agency contracts

Research Hypothesis/Research Questions

This study's hypothesis was that first article test requirements are not appropriately applied to Defense Logistics Agency contracts. The corresponding null hypothesis was that first article test requirements are appropriately applied to Defense Logistics Agency contracts. This study was also guided by the following research questions:

1. What major factors do Engineers and Defense Logistics Agency employees consider prior to applying First Article Test requirements to contracts?

2. What specific discriminators can be applied to First Article Test requirement decision making process?

Assumptions

For the purposes of this study, it was assumed that the surveys completed by the respondents were truthful, that the secondary data reviewed was accurate and that the findings that emerged from the literature review were sufficient to confirm or refute the study's guiding hypothesis.

Definitions of Terms

DoD:

This acronym means refers to the U.S. Department of Defense (DLA at a glance, 2014).

DLA:

This acronym stands for "Defense Logistics Agency" (DLA at a glance, 2014).

DLAD: This acronym stands for "Defense Logistics Acquisition Directive" (DLA at a glance, 2014).

FAR:

This acronym stands for "federal acquisition regulation" (Gourley, 2009).

FAT:

This acronym stands for "first article testing" (Gourley, 2009).

First Article: This term includes preproduction models, initial production samples, test samples, first...

...

The findings that emerged from this study are delimited to DoD acquisitions.
Chapter 2: Literature Review

Chapter Introduction

This chapter reviews the secondary literature to provide an overview of the U.S. Defense Logistics Agency including its mission, customers and activities and the role of first article testing in Department of Defense acquisitions. A summary of the research and important findings concerning these issues are presented in the chapter's conclusion.

Overview of Defense Logistics Agency

Today, the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) is the contracting agency that is responsible for the logistical supply of all basic supplies used by the U.S. military, ranging from "weapons to fuel, and everyday items such as silverware and sandbags" (Harnitchek, 2014, p. 11). Although relatively low-profile when compared to many other Department of Defense organizations, the DLA provides mission-critical logistics services to the nation's armed forces. In this regard, the agency's director, Vice Admiral Mark Harnitchek, reports that, "As America's combat logistics support agency, the Defense Logistics Agency provides the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, other federal agencies, and combined and allied forces with the full spectrum of logistics, acquisition and technical services" (2014, p. 11).

In fact, the DLA is currently responsible for procuring and redistributing virtually all of the items that are consumed by the country's armed forces, including materiel such as construction and barrier equipment, medical supplies, food, uniforms, fuel and more than 85% of the spare parts that are required by the U.S. armed forces (Harnitchek, 2014). Beyond the foregoing, the DLA is also responsible for the administration of reused military equipment, provides document automation and production services as well as catalogs and other logistics information products (DLA at a glance, 2014). Although services are provided by the DLA in 48 states, the agency is tasked with the provision of logistics support to the U.S. military wherever forces may be deployed, making the DLA a truly global organization (DLA at a glance, 2014).

Some salient key facts concerning the DLA include the following:

No civilian company performs the same type of mission as DLA, so comparisons are not really possible. In simple terms, in fiscal 2013 DLA provided $39 billion in sales and revenue. This along with the dollar value of services provided would rank the agency in the top 15th percentile of the Fortune 500.

The DLA employs more than 25,500 civilian and military employees.

The DLA supports roughly 2,400 weapon systems.

The DLA currently manages nine supply chains and nearly 6 million items.

The DLAM administers the storage and disposal of strategic and critical materials to support national defense.

The DLA operates in 48 states and 28 countries.

The DLA processes on average 98,475 requisitions and more than 9,000 contract actions a day.

The DLA manages 25 distribution centers worldwide. Co-locating with warfighters puts supplies where they are most needed and drives DLA's warehousing strategy. Positioning material closer to the customer allows us to improve military readiness and decrease customer wait time and cost, providing effective, efficient and innovative distribution solutions for our customers.

The DLA is a leader in DoD's efforts to supply the military services with alternative fuel and renewable energy solutions.

The DLA supports humanitarian relief efforts at home and abroad, to include the 2011 Japanese earthquake, and hurricanes Isaac and Sandy in 2012. For Isaac, DLA provided 2,138,000 meals and 1,853 gallons of diesel fuel to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Sandy support included 6 million meals, 48 pallets of bottled water, 171,000 blankets and more than 9 million gallons of fuel for first responders.

The DLA provides logistics support to other federal agencies and state and local governments.

Fiscal 2013 Foreign Military Sales totaled $2.1 billion, supporting the security of 113 of America's allied nations (DLA at a glance, 2014, para. 3).

The primary level field activities for the DLA are set forth in Table 1 below.

Table 1

Primary level field activities for the Defense Logistics Agency

Location

Responsibilities

DLA Land and Maritime, Columbus, Ohio

Maritime and land weapons system supply chains.

DLA Aviation, Richmond, Va.

Aviation supply chain.

DLA Troop Support, Philadelphia

Subsistence, clothing, and textiles, medical, and construction and equipment supply chains.

DLA Energy, Fort Belvoir, Va.

Fuel, energy support and services, and bulk petroleum.

DLA Distribution, New Cumberland, Pa.

Worldwide network of 25 distribution depots and nine map support offices.

DLA Disposition Services, Battle Creek, Mich.

Reutilization, transfer, demilitarization, and environmental disposal and reuse.

DLA Strategic…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Borenstein, S. & Markoe, L. (2006, September/October). Prime vendor. The IRE Journal, 29(5),

18-22.

Chandler, G.N. & Lyon, D.W. (2001). Issues of research design and construct measurement in entrepreneurship research: The past decade. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice.

25(4), 101-102.
DLA at a glance. (2014). Defense Logistics Agency. Retrieved from http://www.dla.mil/Pages/ataglance.aspx.
DLA mission. (2014). Defense Logistics Agency. Retrieved from http://www.dla.mil/
First article testing and approval. (2014). U.S. Government Acquisition Central. Retrieved from http://www.acquisition.gov/far/html/Subpart%209_3.html.
WAWF Frequently Asked Questions (2014). Defense Logistics Agency. Retrieved from http://www.dla.mil/WideAreaWorkflow/Documents/WAWFFAQs.pdf.
A Web site designed to heat up competition between public and private vendors is the Defense Logistic Agency's SHARE A-76 (Kutner, 2009). This Web site, launched in December 2000, allows people in the defense community to share their experiences in using the A-76 competitive sourcing process and compare costs (Kutner, 2009). A-76 contracts are those in which competition is open to both government and industry bidders. Contracting officers use the A-76 process to compare the cost of outsourcing a contract to the cost of doing the work in-house (Kutner, 2009). This new Web site, http://emissary.acq.osd.mil/inst/share.nsf, was developed by Arthur Andersen for about $800,000. It provides those who are new to the A-76 process with the general information needed to get them started. It offers links to internal and external A-76 information. In addition, the site allows field technicians from each of the services to learn lessons from each other (Kutner, 2009). A-76 contracts, over the past few years, generally have been split 50-50 between the military and commercial communities, officials said. But the process has still saved money for the department, they insist. Many government workers, however, claim that the A-76 process unfairly favors contractors. Conversely, many contractors believe that the process is biased toward keeping government work in-house (Kutner, 2009).
[Source: http://guidebook.dcma.mil/226/226-2/index.cfm#tools]


Cite this Document:

"Navigating The Department Of Defense Acquisition Process" (2014, October 18) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/navigating-the-department-of-defense-acquisition-192817

"Navigating The Department Of Defense Acquisition Process" 18 October 2014. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/navigating-the-department-of-defense-acquisition-192817>

"Navigating The Department Of Defense Acquisition Process", 18 October 2014, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/navigating-the-department-of-defense-acquisition-192817

Related Documents

Alternative B -- Implement a Contracts Procurment Requisition Pre-Approval Process -- This would eliminate ERP system errors created by utilizing incorrect information and shortening the time to execute a contract modification. Alternative C - Implement a shared drive system utilizing the local network to track funding actions by contract. This effort would create a filing system housed completely on the LAN. Specialists would save their funding action files on the network

66). Furthermore, social software will only increase in importance in helping organizations maintain and manage their domains of knowledge and information. When networks are enabled and flourish, their value to all users and to the organization increases as well. That increase in value is typically nonlinear, where some additions yield more than proportionate values to the organization (McCluskey and Korobow, 2009). Some of the key characteristics of social software applications

Soft Systems Techniques in the Preparation of Information Technology as a Systems Manager Company Systems Consulting process and model Systems approach, client relationships Company Culture Client defenses, attachments to existing systems Interaction with the company culture in order to facilitate change System and Culture working together Dependancy issues Lewin Company Systems Consulting process and model Systems approach, client relationships Company Culture Client defenses, attachments to existing systems Interaction with the company culture in order to facilitate change System and Culture working together Dependency issues Lewin's model of

The exponential growth of the Internet has also served as the catalyst for the growth of highly collaborative, interactive forums and platforms on which Delphi-like brainstorming can be accomplished (Decker, Wagner, Scholz, 2005). Conversely many of the external relationships companies have and that are essential to understanding how the strategic planning process will impact an organization lend themselves to quantification. An example of this level of quantification of external

Grief Schiz Precautions and Procedures for the Prevention of Suicide and the Treatment of Depression in Recently Diagnosed Schizophrenics Any major chronic medical diagnosis can have psychological and emotional reverberations for the patient, as chronic conditions can often be perceived as a "life sentence" of sorts. The inescapability of symptoms and the long-term prognosis of many chronic disorders can cause patients to seriously question their future quality of life, the impact that

The Price-Sensitive Affluents, Wal-Mart has learned (Wal-Mart Annual Reports) is more interested in finding an exceptionally good deal and not necessarily concerned about the shopping experience. This is particularly true as one of the strongest factors influencing the execution of their strategy, the emerging global recession during this timeframe, takes hold. Again as with the Price Value Shopper and the paradoxical purchasing patterns of the Brand Aspirational segment show,