New Drug Development And Approval Research Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
935
Cite

A pilot batch of Clinical Trial Materials (CTM) may be produced after the new drug has completed these initial tests. Upon completion of preclinical testing, the drug sponsor files an Investigational New Drug Application (IND) with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), after they have obtained prerequisite approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB). The purpose of the investigation is to assure that the new drug is safe and meets stated objectives for human consumption. Among other things, all formulations must meet FDA Current Good Manufacturing Practice guidelines before human testing can begin. Ordinarily, the FDA has 30 days to respond to the application. After the drug receives this initial approval clinical trials may begin within 30 days.

Clinical trials proceed in four phases, with each phase increasing in number of test subjects and duration. Phase I verifies safety of the new drug entity; 67% of drugs successfully complete Phase I. Phase II evaluates the drug's effectiveness; 45% of drugs have a Phase II positive outcome. Phase III verifies efficacy and ascertains possible adverse reactions in large populations; 5-10% of drugs successfully complete this phase. Lastly, Phase IV concentrates on post-marketing surveillance which seeks to identify adverse reactions that are rare and go undetected during previous studies, monitor known reactions, and identify other risk factors.

Following the completion of clinical trials, the sponsoring company evaluates...

...

The NDA gives a comprehensive, lengthy presentation of relevant data, which often consisting of several hundred volumes. Regulation permits the FDA 180 days to complete a review of the NDA, which may be extended if both parties agree. When the NDA receives approval from the FDA, the sponsor may begin marketing, and physicians may prescribe the new medication. The company continues to submit follow-up reports on the new drug, noting any adverse reactions which may suggest quality control measures.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Friedhoff, Lawrence, Lawrence T., and M.d. New Drugs: An Insider's Guide to the FDA'New Drug Approval Process for Scientists, Investors and Patients. New York: PSPG Publishing, 2009. Print.

"How Drugs are Developed and Approved." U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Last updated 04/23/2010: Web. 17 Jan 2011. <http://www.fda.gov>.

Janodia, MD. "Drug Development Process: A Review." Pharmaceutical News 12/25/2007: Web. 17 Jan 2011. .

Mathieu, Mark, and Christopher-Paul Milne. New Drug Development: A Regulatory Overview. 8th. MA: Barnett Educational Services Chi, 2008. Print.


Cite this Document:

"New Drug Development And Approval" (2011, January 17) Retrieved April 16, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/new-drug-development-and-approval-5418

"New Drug Development And Approval" 17 January 2011. Web.16 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/new-drug-development-and-approval-5418>

"New Drug Development And Approval", 17 January 2011, Accessed.16 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/new-drug-development-and-approval-5418

Related Documents

Cancer Drugs For the past several decades, the news about cancer in the United States has been increasingly positive and that trend has continued unabated over the past decade. According to the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health, the overall incidence rate for men has declined by an average of 0.6% every year between 2004 and 2008, while for women, the incidence rate has dropped 0.5% per

14). Soon, Congress passed the Marijuana Tax Act, which was signed into law in 1937. Like the Harrison Act, the Marijuana Tax Act placed marijuana into the same category as the cocaine and opium drugs. It was now illegal to import marijuana into the United States (McWilliams, 1991). However, this law was ineffective in curbing marijuana use (Brecher, 1986, p. 14). By the early 1940s narcotic addiction had significantly reduced

The Orphan Drug Act is an extension of these ethics, but veers away from utilitarianism. The principle at work with orphan drugs is more deontological in its nature because it uses massive amounts of taxpayer money to provide drugs for relatively few individuals, under the idea that all Americans deserve their ailments to be treated, not just Americans with common ailments. From this analysis, Vertex appears to be operating with

It so happened that Russian doctor Karlov was trying to find patients for another clinical trial for an experimental drug, and Ershov fit the requirements to enter the study. "They told me the treatment was safe," says Ershov. "I trust my doctor completely." Like 90% of Karlov's other clinical-trial patients, he immediately signed the consent form (Lustgarten, p. 1). Russia is one of those countries that suffers from high

According to these authors, the fatal tragedy could easily have been avoided by taking more time for more focused and carefully planned clinical trials. According to this view, it was unethical to test Tysabri in the way it has been done, and furthermore irresponsible to enter it into the market before all side-effects were ascertained. 3. Interested parties: The interested parties in this case include Walter Smith, Anita's widower, as

Medical Devices The Bleeding Edge is a Netflix film that examines the $400 billion medical device industry, which produces and markets highly complex apparatuses that are implanted into human bodies (Dick, 2018). The documentary was carried out on the premise that more than 70 million Americans have been outfitted with internal medical devices. While there are numerous medical devices that help uplift and save people’s lives such as corneal transplants and